TLDR: India keeps crypto rules limited, warning full regulation could boost adoption and create systemic risk. $4.5B held in crypto by Indian households is not seen as a threat to financial stability. Stablecoins worry India, as they may compete with UPI and challenge monetary control. 30% crypto tax and AML rules stay as government monitors [...] The post Why India Won’t Legalise Full Crypto Laws Yet appeared first on Blockonomi.TLDR: India keeps crypto rules limited, warning full regulation could boost adoption and create systemic risk. $4.5B held in crypto by Indian households is not seen as a threat to financial stability. Stablecoins worry India, as they may compete with UPI and challenge monetary control. 30% crypto tax and AML rules stay as government monitors [...] The post Why India Won’t Legalise Full Crypto Laws Yet appeared first on Blockonomi.

Why India Won’t Legalise Full Crypto Laws Yet

TLDR:

  • India keeps crypto rules limited, warning full regulation could boost adoption and create systemic risk.
  • $4.5B held in crypto by Indian households is not seen as a threat to financial stability.
  • Stablecoins worry India, as they may compete with UPI and challenge monetary control.
  • 30% crypto tax and AML rules stay as government monitors risks before new framework.

India is not ready to fully open the door to crypto. Instead, it is choosing a cautious path. Officials believe that regulating the sector too broadly could fuel its growth and make it harder to control. 

The government is keeping current rules in place, including taxation and exchange registration. A document seen by Reuters shows that policymakers are focused on keeping financial stability intact.

India Holds Back on Full Crypto Framework

The Reserve Bank of India has argued that formal regulation could legitimize crypto assets. That, in turn, might lead to wider adoption and bring new risks to the economy. The document states that a regulated crypto market could become large enough to pose a systemic threat.

Authorities are also worried about enforcement. Even with regulation, peer-to-peer trading and decentralized platforms would be difficult to monitor. The government believes a ban would face the same challenge, which is why it favors a middle ground.

India is tracking global developments closely. The United States has recently moved to expand stablecoin use. Indian officials fear that allowing dollar-backed stablecoins could weaken the country’s own payment system.

Current measures, such as a 30% tax on gains and mandatory exchange registration, remain in place. Officials say this approach helps deter speculation without giving crypto full recognition.

Limited Oversight to Manage Crypto Price Risks

According to the government document, Indian households hold about $4.5 billion worth of crypto. Policymakers do not view this exposure as a risk to the wider financial system yet.

Stablecoins remain a bigger concern. Officials fear that if they gain traction, they could compete with the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and affect monetary policy. The focus is on keeping UPI as the dominant retail payment network.

Price swings in crypto also raise red flags. Authorities warn that speculative rallies could spill over into other markets if left unchecked. Keeping the tax structure and anti-money laundering rules in place allows them to watch the sector closely.

The government’s stance signals a slow approach to policy change. Rather than rushing to create a full legal framework, India prefers to monitor market activity and act only when it becomes necessary.

India’s measured approach shows that risk control takes priority over rapid adoption. Policymakers are betting that limited oversight will contain crypto activity without fueling uncontrolled growth.

The post Why India Won’t Legalise Full Crypto Laws Yet appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.009619
$0.009619$0.009619
+0.15%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trade War Headlines Trigger $800M In Liquidations Overnight: Longs Get Wiped Out Across Crypto Markets

Trade War Headlines Trigger $800M In Liquidations Overnight: Longs Get Wiped Out Across Crypto Markets

The crypto market faced a sharp selloff overnight as renewed trade conflict fears between the United States and the European Union shook global risk sentiment.
Share
NewsBTC2026/01/20 11:00
Rokid Ai Glasses Style Now Available Globally

Rokid Ai Glasses Style Now Available Globally

The world’s first open ecosystem AI smart glasses—ultra-light, prescription-first, and built for ChatGPT, Qwen, DeepSeek, and more—are now shipping worldwide, starting
Share
AI Journal2026/01/20 11:45
FCA, crackdown on crypto

FCA, crackdown on crypto

The post FCA, crackdown on crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United Kingdom enters a decisive phase. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated a consultation to set minimum standards on transparency, consumer protection, and digital custody, in order to strengthen market confidence and ensure safer operations for exchanges, wallets, and crypto service providers. The consultation was published on May 2, 2025, and opened a public discussion on operational responsibilities and safeguarding requirements for digital assets (CoinDesk). The goal is to make the rules clearer without hindering the sector’s evolution. According to the data collected by our regulatory monitoring team, in the first weeks following the publication, the feedback received from professionals and operators focused mainly on custody, incident reporting, and insurance requirements. Industry analysts note that many responses require technical clarifications on multi-sig, asset segregation, and recovery protocols, as well as proposals to scale obligations based on the size of the operator. FCA Consultation: What’s on the Table The consultation document clarifies how to apply rules inspired by traditional finance to the crypto perimeter, balancing innovation, market integrity, and user protection. In this context, the goal is to introduce minimum standards for all firms under the supervision of the FCA, an essential step for a more transparent and secure sector, with measurable benefits for users. The proposed pillars Obligations towards consumers: assessment on the extension of the Consumer Duty – a requirement that mandates companies to provide “good outcomes” – to crypto services, with outcomes for users that are traceable and verifiable. Operational resilience: introduction of continuity requirements, incident response plans, and periodic testing to ensure the operational stability of platforms even in adverse scenarios. Financial Crime Prevention: strengthening AML/CFT measures through more stringent transaction monitoring and structured counterpart checks. Custody and safeguarding: definition of operational methods for the segregation of client assets, secure…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:40