The post Bitcoin Core Slashes Def Relay Fee by 90%: Update Rolls Out appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin’s core software lowered the default minimum relay fee for transactions, marking one of the most significant changes in years for economically moving funds across the network. Bitcoin Core 29.1, released on Sept. 4, sets the default minimum relay fee rate to 100 satoshis per thousand virtual bytes (0.1 sats/vB), a 90% reduction from the previous default rate of 1 sat/vB. Users pay their fees in satoshis (the smallest unit of Bitcoin) multiplied by the size of their transaction. While every individual node operator can change this setting, most are expected to stick with the default value. Nodes do not relay and mostly ignore transactions with fees lower than the value they set for the minimum relay fee rate. The decision to make the change was made by Bitcoin Core developers on Aug. 15 “in response to bitcoin’s exchange rate changes in the last ~10 years.” The proposal stated that the minimum fee is a denial-of-service (DoS) attack protection rule, but suggested that, with prices now significantly higher, a lower fee in Bitcoin (BTC) is acceptable. Adoption expected to roll out slowly According to BitRef data, over 72.5% of all Bitcoin nodes (18,811) run the Bitcoin Core node software, and the remaining almost 27.25% run Bitcoin Knots, a fork of the Bitcoin Core software focused on ensuring more user control. A deeper analysis found that the most popular node software is Bitcoin Core 29, with 4,510 nodes representing over 18% of the network. Related: Ordinals dev floats forking Bitcoin Core amid censorship concerns This is followed by 3,991 Bitcoin Core 28.1 nodes (nearly 16%) and 3,083 Bitcoin Knots 29.1 nodes (12.31%). Only 571 nodes run Bitcoin Core 29.1, representing less than 2.3% of the network. While Bitcoin Knots 29.1 is based on Bitcoin Core 29.1, it does not inherit its… The post Bitcoin Core Slashes Def Relay Fee by 90%: Update Rolls Out appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin’s core software lowered the default minimum relay fee for transactions, marking one of the most significant changes in years for economically moving funds across the network. Bitcoin Core 29.1, released on Sept. 4, sets the default minimum relay fee rate to 100 satoshis per thousand virtual bytes (0.1 sats/vB), a 90% reduction from the previous default rate of 1 sat/vB. Users pay their fees in satoshis (the smallest unit of Bitcoin) multiplied by the size of their transaction. While every individual node operator can change this setting, most are expected to stick with the default value. Nodes do not relay and mostly ignore transactions with fees lower than the value they set for the minimum relay fee rate. The decision to make the change was made by Bitcoin Core developers on Aug. 15 “in response to bitcoin’s exchange rate changes in the last ~10 years.” The proposal stated that the minimum fee is a denial-of-service (DoS) attack protection rule, but suggested that, with prices now significantly higher, a lower fee in Bitcoin (BTC) is acceptable. Adoption expected to roll out slowly According to BitRef data, over 72.5% of all Bitcoin nodes (18,811) run the Bitcoin Core node software, and the remaining almost 27.25% run Bitcoin Knots, a fork of the Bitcoin Core software focused on ensuring more user control. A deeper analysis found that the most popular node software is Bitcoin Core 29, with 4,510 nodes representing over 18% of the network. Related: Ordinals dev floats forking Bitcoin Core amid censorship concerns This is followed by 3,991 Bitcoin Core 28.1 nodes (nearly 16%) and 3,083 Bitcoin Knots 29.1 nodes (12.31%). Only 571 nodes run Bitcoin Core 29.1, representing less than 2.3% of the network. While Bitcoin Knots 29.1 is based on Bitcoin Core 29.1, it does not inherit its…

Bitcoin Core Slashes Def Relay Fee by 90%: Update Rolls Out

2025/09/16 11:56

Bitcoin’s core software lowered the default minimum relay fee for transactions, marking one of the most significant changes in years for economically moving funds across the network.

Bitcoin Core 29.1, released on Sept. 4, sets the default minimum relay fee rate to 100 satoshis per thousand virtual bytes (0.1 sats/vB), a 90% reduction from the previous default rate of 1 sat/vB. Users pay their fees in satoshis (the smallest unit of Bitcoin) multiplied by the size of their transaction.

While every individual node operator can change this setting, most are expected to stick with the default value. Nodes do not relay and mostly ignore transactions with fees lower than the value they set for the minimum relay fee rate.

The decision to make the change was made by Bitcoin Core developers on Aug. 15 “in response to bitcoin’s exchange rate changes in the last ~10 years.” The proposal stated that the minimum fee is a denial-of-service (DoS) attack protection rule, but suggested that, with prices now significantly higher, a lower fee in Bitcoin (BTC) is acceptable.

Adoption expected to roll out slowly

According to BitRef data, over 72.5% of all Bitcoin nodes (18,811) run the Bitcoin Core node software, and the remaining almost 27.25% run Bitcoin Knots, a fork of the Bitcoin Core software focused on ensuring more user control. A deeper analysis found that the most popular node software is Bitcoin Core 29, with 4,510 nodes representing over 18% of the network.

Related: Ordinals dev floats forking Bitcoin Core amid censorship concerns

This is followed by 3,991 Bitcoin Core 28.1 nodes (nearly 16%) and 3,083 Bitcoin Knots 29.1 nodes (12.31%). Only 571 nodes run Bitcoin Core 29.1, representing less than 2.3% of the network.

While Bitcoin Knots 29.1 is based on Bitcoin Core 29.1, it does not inherit its new defaults. Instead, with this update, Knots decided to “make most policy options configurable in GUI Options, and add ‘corepolicy’ option to use Bitcoin Core defaults.”

Bitcoin Knots raises the Bitcoin Core default minimum relay fee 10-fold to maintain the old value. Source: GitHub

A majority of the 571 Bitcoin nodes running Bitcoin Core 29.1 and a hard-to-predict portion of the 3,083 Bitcoin Knots 29.1 nodes are likely running the newer, lower minimum relay fee policy.

Related: Bitcoin Knots gain ground: Will a chain split kill BTC price?

Community reacts to lower fees

A Bitcoin Core developer, Gloria Zhao, said the change is also motivated by a recent trend in which transactions cheaper than the previous limit are mined either way. This is because, while the default value was set one way, node operators were allowed to run the value that they prefer.

This caused issues, since “blocks with lots of sub-1sat/vB transactions don’t propagate as quickly to nodes that rejected or didn’t hear about those transactions earlier.” Still, to keep the network protected against spam and DoS attacks, Zhao highlighted the need to avoid making the default value too cheap, but still lower to prevent the described block relay issues.

Bitcoin network data service Mempool.Space also advocated for lower fees, advising users not to overpay for the space that they use on the blockchain. “0.1 sat/vB is the new one sat/vB,” it wrote in a mid-July X post.

Source: Mempool

Magazine: Bitcoin’s long-term security budget problem: Impending crisis or FUD?

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-core-default-minimum-relay-fees-decreases-90-as-update-rolls-out?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
ChangeX Logo
ChangeX Price(CHANGE)
$0.00137472
$0.00137472$0.00137472
+0.14%
USD
ChangeX (CHANGE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Volante Technologies Customers Successfully Navigate Critical Regulatory Deadlines for EU SEPA Instant and Global SWIFT Cross-Border Payments

Volante Technologies Customers Successfully Navigate Critical Regulatory Deadlines for EU SEPA Instant and Global SWIFT Cross-Border Payments

PaaS leader ensures seamless migrations and uninterrupted payment operations LONDON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Volante Technologies, the global leader in Payments as a Service
Share
AI Journal2025/12/16 17:16
Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

In a significant pivot, the Federal Reserve reduced its benchmark interest rate following a prolonged ten-month hiatus. This decision, reflecting a strategic response to the current economic climate, has captured attention across financial sectors, with both market participants and policymakers keenly evaluating its potential impact.Continue Reading:Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:28
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00