At least seven asset managers have filed amended registration statements for their proposed spot Solana ETFs with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as potential approval draws closer. As of August 1, firms including Bitwise, Canary Capital, Fidelity, CoinShares, Grayscale,…At least seven asset managers have filed amended registration statements for their proposed spot Solana ETFs with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as potential approval draws closer. As of August 1, firms including Bitwise, Canary Capital, Fidelity, CoinShares, Grayscale,…

Solana ETFs coming soon? Seven asset managers file amended S-1s with the SEC

At least seven asset managers have filed amended registration statements for their proposed spot Solana ETFs with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as potential approval draws closer.

As of August 1, firms including Bitwise, Canary Capital, Fidelity, CoinShares, Grayscale, Franklin Templeton, and VanEck have submitted updates to their S-1 registration statements.

What is an amended S-1 registration?

For those unaware, an S-1 is a document filed with the SEC that companies use to register new securities for public offering. In the case of spot Solana ETFs, these filings serve as the formal proposal to launch a new fund that would offer direct exposure to SOL, the native token of the Solana blockchain. 

These registration statements outline crucial information such as the fund’s structure, objectives, fees, custodianship, and risk factors.

Amending the S-1 typically reflects feedback from the SEC or internal adjustments by the issuer. The changes might include clarifications on creation and redemption procedures, disclosures about potential staking of SOL, or updates to custodian arrangements.

While the recent amendments were not substantial in content, according to market analyst Nate Geraci, they indicate that both issuers and regulators are working toward consensus on key language and structural details.

Will Solana ETFs be approved?

Once issuers file or amend their S-1s, the SEC reviews the documents and provides comments. Issuers must then respond and potentially submit further updates. The process continues until the SEC deems the proposal satisfactory.

For a spot ETF to launch, both the S-1 and a separate 19b-4 filing—proposing a rule change to list the ETF on a national exchange—must be approved. Some issuers have already filed their 19b-4s, while others are expected to do so shortly.

Last month, unnamed sources claimed the commission had asked issuers to submit revised filings addressing issues like in-kind redemptions and staking.

The SEC was also said to be reviewing how issuers plan to handle in-kind redemptions and whether staking will be incorporated into the ETF structure.

On July 30, the SEC approved in-kind creation and redemption for all spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, lending credibility to earlier reports that a Solana ETF approval could also be on the horizon. If that happens, Solana ETFs may also adopt in-kind redemption structures from the outset.

As for timing, the SEC typically responds to amended S-1 filings within two to four weeks. Given the procedural tone of the latest updates and reports of active dialogue, a final decision on the first Solana ETF approvals could arrive by late August or September, ahead of the October deadline.

At press time, bettors on Polymarket were almost certain that Solana ETFs will be getting approved by the end of 2025.

Market Opportunity
SOON Logo
SOON Price(SOON)
$0.3591
$0.3591$0.3591
-4.36%
USD
SOON (SOON) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

BitcoinWorld Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims In a significant move for cryptocurrency security, Trust Wallet has committed
Share
bitcoinworld2025/12/26 17:40
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

CZ hinted at possible insider involvement in the Trust Wallet incident while assuring users that their funds would be reimbursed.
Share
CryptoPotato2025/12/26 16:48