PANews reported on July 15 that according to Digital Times, the legislative process of South Korea's "Digital Asset Innovation Act" has been delayed again. The bill originally planned to bePANews reported on July 15 that according to Digital Times, the legislative process of South Korea's "Digital Asset Innovation Act" has been delayed again. The bill originally planned to be
South Korea's Digital Asset Innovation Act legislative process delayed again
PANews reported on July 15 that according to Digital Times, the legislative process of South Korea's "Digital Asset Innovation Act" has been delayed again. The bill originally planned to be submitted this month was forced to be postponed for 1-2 months due to disagreements between financial regulators and the industry. The bill aims to establish the legal definition of digital assets and Korean won stablecoins, and to build an industry regulatory framework. It is regarded as a basic law in the field of digital assets in South Korea.
Currently, South Korea has only passed the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, which focuses on investor protection, in 2023, and basic legislation covering the entire industry chain, including issuance and circulation, has been absent for a long time. Although President Lee Jae-myung expressed support for the development of the digital asset industry during his campaign, regulators and the industry still have disputes over key terms such as the issuer of stablecoins and the division of authority over central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).
Market Opportunity
The AI Prophecy Price(ACT)
$0.03994
$0.03994$0.03994
USD
The AI Prophecy (ACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny
The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement
PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58
Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance
The post Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin recently sold small
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 05:14