An in-depth look at where ICOs came from, where they are going, and why they matter.An in-depth look at where ICOs came from, where they are going, and why they matter.

Thinking about the formation of crypto capital: Why would the return of public offerings be so beneficial?

2025/01/19 14:51

Author: Regan Bozman , former first employee of CoinList, now co-founder of Lattice Capital

Compiled by: Felix, PANews

The strong return of ICOs (initial coin offerings/public offerings) is extremely beneficial to the crypto space and has laid a stronger foundation of token holders for this cycle.

The story begins in 2010 when Naval, a well-known investor, saw an opportunity to introduce retail investors to venture capital and democratize the asset class.

He launched AngelList, and by 2013, the platform had helped startups raise more than $200 million.

AngelList’s original product was an email list (hence the name) for connecting startups with investors.

It sounds silly and basic, but Naval has become so influential in Silicon Valley that a ton of companies, including Uber, have raised money through this email list.

In 2014, AngelList launched Syndicates, which was a turning point.

Syndicates transformed AngelList from a platform-centric investor to a lead-centric investor.

Keep this distinction in mind; we'll come back to it later.

Equity crowdfunding never finds PMF (product-market fit) due to adverse selection — why would a great startup that could raise money from VCs want to raise money from a random platform?

(Note: Adverse selection refers to the situation where the party with information advantage cannot know the true situation of the party with information disadvantage before the transaction occurs, which leads to the party with information disadvantage making the wrong choice)

Syndicates flip that idea on its head by focusing investments on one lead investor rather than AngelList itself.

Syndicates provide leverage to angel investors who have deal experience but not necessarily capital.

For example, John Smith is an influential marketer that startup founders want to work with, but he lacks funding.

John Smith received a $300,000 quota on a hot deal. He invested $1,000, formed a syndicate, raised another $299,000, and then won. Then:

  • The startup started working with him
  • He evaluated his investment
  • Retail investors gain access to investment opportunities

Syndicates quickly grew, funding hundreds of companies, including Pillback and Brex.

It also helped launch the careers of many influential venture capitalists such as Semil Shah and Ed Roman.

Anyway…back to crypto.

In 2016, I moved to San Francisco, worked on AngelList’s venture capital team, and started doing cryptocurrency trading here and there, but that’s not the point.

In addition to startup equity, venture capital funds are subject to regulatory restrictions that make public offerings challenging.

However, Naval became a true crypto believer earlier than most, spinning off CoinList from AngelList in 2017 to focus solely on cryptocurrencies.

CoinList’s mission is to build a seamless, compliant way for companies to conduct initial token offerings.

Interestingly, CoinList does not deal with the adverse selection problem faced by AngelList, and therefore remains platform-centric.

While a fast-growing seed-stage SaaS company has no interest in 1,000 retail backers, every company in crypto wants as many backers as possible.

The fact that CoinList found a truly insane PMF on day one, with the first customer being Filecoin, raising $200M, speaks volumes.

There were some nice sales during that cycle like Stacks, but by the second quarter of 2018, things took a sharp turn for the worse.

CoinList hadn’t earned any revenue from token sales in over a year, and the situation was dire.

Regan Bozman (the author of this article), Mike Zajko (formerly CoinList's Director of Sales), and other CoinLista members would go to the bar on Friday afternoons, drink six pints of Guinness, and wonder what the hell they were doing.

But the market recovered, and by the end of 2019, the team wanted to issue tokens again. It quickly helped launch ALGO, NEAR, SOL, and a few other tokens.

The token sale offering is largely the same — the team still wants as many token holders as possible.

The big difference is that by now, most lawyers are telling teams to avoid the U.S. entirely. So these are sales that exclude U.S. persons.

CoinList has had its ups and downs but has launched a range of tokens that have made users a lot of money.

At the end of the day, if you’re in this business, this is your KPI.

Starting in 2022, the rules of the game shift from token sales to airdrops.

Once OP and ARB abandoned public token sales, most blue chip teams issuing tokens would have listened to their lawyers’ advice and done so.

Eigenlayer, ZKSync, Jito, Morpho, Magic Eden, none of them conducted ICO.

This resulted in a challenging first nine months of this cycle.

The market structure transfers most of the returns from retail investors to venture capitalists.

Retail investors are in this business to make money, and the disruption of token sales is a huge setback.

I have spoken to dozens of founders about token offerings over the last year. Almost all of them understand the benefits of a public sale and want to do it, but it is difficult to go against the advice of lawyers. So the market has been stagnant.

That all changed in the fourth quarter of last year. Trump’s election opened up the design space for launching tokens.

  • Cobie launches Echo, a public sale platform
  • Matty launches Legion public sale platform

Public offerings have returned strongly.

I have a lot of respect for both teams, but the core products of these two sites are not new.

  • Legion is an on-chain CoinList — platform-centric
  • Echo is an AngelList on the chain — centered on leaders

When CoinList launched in 2017, it wasn’t feasible to build this business on-chain, but if it were to be rebuilt today, it would take this approach and not take custody of user assets.

One of the biggest challenges CoinList faces is that the costs of running a centralized crypto company in the United States are very high, and it is difficult to generate sustained profitability without sufficient recurring revenue (such as trading fees).

Legion may be able to run due diligence faster and more easily than CoinList because it is not based in the United States.

This will obviously have a negative impact on subsequent development, but it also means that it can scale up faster.

Echo’s core product is Syndicates, the on-chain version of AngelList.

Leaders like CMS Holdings bring their ongoing deals to Echo.

  • They get free leverage
  • The project expands its community
  • Retail investors get priority access

This is a really cool model, I wish I could come up with this one.

AngelList’s Syndicates will always hit a wall in normal venture capital because when anything goes public, adverse selection is inevitable.

Their core business is now driven primarily by Funds rather than Syndicates.

But this adverse selection doesn’t (largely) exist in crypto, because teams don’t worry about whether their metrics are public (it’s all on-chain), and they actively want a large community.

Hats off to Cobie, he really is the GOAT.

Additionally, AngelList had to spend years building the financial infrastructure to manage its business.

The software used to manage capital tables, allocations, accounting, and carried interest for hundreds of funds and tens of thousands of investors around the world is numerous and extremely complex.

Blockchain solves this problem. Echo is able to handle incoming funds, manage the ledger, and process distribution on the chain, making it a hundred times more efficient.

Now they still have the same incentive problem that AngelList has, which is free leverage on deal leads.

And there’s also some potential adverse selection, as heavily oversubscribed deals may not make it to the Echo.

If you manage a fund but you only receive distributions from that fund in a trade, rather than your Echo Syndicate distributions, then you have a fiduciary responsibility to your investors to give priority to that fund.

So in theory, any given best deal might not make it to the Echo.

But this is a known risk and a basket of early trades on this platform are likely to make money.

I am still very optimistic about Echo and expect that by the end of this year, more than 50% of reliable encryption teams will raise part of their funds on Echo. This is great for the field and returns to the original intention of the creation.

PS: Lattice Capital could invest if Cobie were no longer anonymous.

Related reading: From being the center of attention to being forgotten by the crowd, what happened to CoinList, once the “first stop for new listings”?

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.00000001895
$0.00000001895$0.00000001895
0.00%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
Share
PANews2025/04/14 17:12