Quick HighlightsFOCIL aims to prevent an oligopoly of Ethereum validators.Critics fear legal risks for U.S. validators under FOCIL.Buterin's vision: Ethereum as a neutral ”dumb pipe” free from control.Ethereum's New Proposal: Vitalik Buterin Defends EIP-7805 Against CriticismEthereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin responded to criticism of the EIP-7805 (FOCIL) mechanism, a proposal designed to ensure Ethereum's first level (L1) remains a neutral network. This mechanism is intended to prevent the formation of an oligopoly among builders, preserving Ethereum's decentralized nature.The EIP-7805 proposal was brought to light by user Amin Soleimani. It’s important to note that Buterin himself is the author of the FOCIL concept, which was submitted for consideration in November 2024. Although the proposal is still in draft status and awaiting approval, it has already stirred significant controversy.FOCIL, aimed at combating Ethereum’s centralization, involves introducing 16 additional validators per slot. One validator would have the authority to determine the order of transactions, although all proposed transfers would still be included in the block.But Soleimani voiced concerns about the potential risks this could bring to validators, arguing that the implementation of this mechanism would increase legal liabilities, particularly for those operating in the U.S. Ethereum’s anti-censorship measures have so far allowed node operators to avoid the inclusion of transactions involving sanctioned services like Tornado Cash, only delaying their processing rather than excluding them entirely.Is Ethereum's Neutrality at Risk with FOCIL? The Legal Debate ExplainedSoleimani argued that under FOCIL, validators would no longer be able to filter out transactions from sanctioned services. He expressed concern that this could expose U.S. validators to legal risks. Soleimani noted:”If I were the U.S. government, I would 100% support FOCIL. It means I can arrest any U.S. validator, confiscate their assets, and prosecute them for violating sanctions.”Buterin responded to these criticisms by emphasizing that the goal of FOCIL was to protect Ethereum's L1 status as a ”dumb pipe” — a neutral network that only transmits data without controlling it.Buterin’s Vision: Why Ethereum Must Stay a ‘Dumb Pipe’Buterin firmly believes that forcing validators to include sanctioned transactions is necessary for Ethereum's long-term health. He stressed that Ethereum's L1 must remain neutral, free from interference by any single entity, including validators. This neutrality is achieved by introducing several safeguards:Ensuring the mempool is stable and functional for simple block creation.Creating non-protocol technologies for distributed block construction.Establishing multiple channels to enable transactions.FOCIL is one of the latest mechanisms to achieve these goals. Buterin argues that it provides benefits to both validators and attesters, making the latter's work simpler from a technical standpoint.Can FOCIL Secure Ethereum’s Decentralized Future?With the potential adoption of EIP-7701, Buterin envisions expanding FOCIL’s capabilities to further eliminate centralized intermediaries. The ultimate goal is to prevent an oligopoly of validators from gaining veto power over which transactions get included in blocks.In response, Soleimani emphasized that Ethereum was never intended to be a “passive channel.” For him, Buterin’s vision of Ethereum as a neutral pipe is an ideal that fails to reflect the reality of Ethereum’s current status.Quick HighlightsFOCIL aims to prevent an oligopoly of Ethereum validators.Critics fear legal risks for U.S. validators under FOCIL.Buterin's vision: Ethereum as a neutral ”dumb pipe” free from control.Ethereum's New Proposal: Vitalik Buterin Defends EIP-7805 Against CriticismEthereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin responded to criticism of the EIP-7805 (FOCIL) mechanism, a proposal designed to ensure Ethereum's first level (L1) remains a neutral network. This mechanism is intended to prevent the formation of an oligopoly among builders, preserving Ethereum's decentralized nature.The EIP-7805 proposal was brought to light by user Amin Soleimani. It’s important to note that Buterin himself is the author of the FOCIL concept, which was submitted for consideration in November 2024. Although the proposal is still in draft status and awaiting approval, it has already stirred significant controversy.FOCIL, aimed at combating Ethereum’s centralization, involves introducing 16 additional validators per slot. One validator would have the authority to determine the order of transactions, although all proposed transfers would still be included in the block.But Soleimani voiced concerns about the potential risks this could bring to validators, arguing that the implementation of this mechanism would increase legal liabilities, particularly for those operating in the U.S. Ethereum’s anti-censorship measures have so far allowed node operators to avoid the inclusion of transactions involving sanctioned services like Tornado Cash, only delaying their processing rather than excluding them entirely.Is Ethereum's Neutrality at Risk with FOCIL? The Legal Debate ExplainedSoleimani argued that under FOCIL, validators would no longer be able to filter out transactions from sanctioned services. He expressed concern that this could expose U.S. validators to legal risks. Soleimani noted:”If I were the U.S. government, I would 100% support FOCIL. It means I can arrest any U.S. validator, confiscate their assets, and prosecute them for violating sanctions.”Buterin responded to these criticisms by emphasizing that the goal of FOCIL was to protect Ethereum's L1 status as a ”dumb pipe” — a neutral network that only transmits data without controlling it.Buterin’s Vision: Why Ethereum Must Stay a ‘Dumb Pipe’Buterin firmly believes that forcing validators to include sanctioned transactions is necessary for Ethereum's long-term health. He stressed that Ethereum's L1 must remain neutral, free from interference by any single entity, including validators. This neutrality is achieved by introducing several safeguards:Ensuring the mempool is stable and functional for simple block creation.Creating non-protocol technologies for distributed block construction.Establishing multiple channels to enable transactions.FOCIL is one of the latest mechanisms to achieve these goals. Buterin argues that it provides benefits to both validators and attesters, making the latter's work simpler from a technical standpoint.Can FOCIL Secure Ethereum’s Decentralized Future?With the potential adoption of EIP-7701, Buterin envisions expanding FOCIL’s capabilities to further eliminate centralized intermediaries. The ultimate goal is to prevent an oligopoly of validators from gaining veto power over which transactions get included in blocks.In response, Soleimani emphasized that Ethereum was never intended to be a “passive channel.” For him, Buterin’s vision of Ethereum as a neutral pipe is an ideal that fails to reflect the reality of Ethereum’s current status.

Vitalik Buterin Defends Ethereum's Future Against Centralization with EIP-7805

Quick Highlights

  • FOCIL aims to prevent an oligopoly of Ethereum validators.
  • Critics fear legal risks for U.S. validators under FOCIL.
  • Buterin's vision: Ethereum as a neutral ”dumb pipe” free from control.

Ethereum's New Proposal: Vitalik Buterin Defends EIP-7805 Against Criticism

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin responded to criticism of the EIP-7805 (FOCIL) mechanism, a proposal designed to ensure Ethereum's first level (L1) remains a neutral network. This mechanism is intended to prevent the formation of an oligopoly among builders, preserving Ethereum's decentralized nature.

The EIP-7805 proposal was brought to light by user Amin Soleimani. It’s important to note that Buterin himself is the author of the FOCIL concept, which was submitted for consideration in November 2024. Although the proposal is still in draft status and awaiting approval, it has already stirred significant controversy.

FOCIL, aimed at combating Ethereum’s centralization, involves introducing 16 additional validators per slot. One validator would have the authority to determine the order of transactions, although all proposed transfers would still be included in the block.

But Soleimani voiced concerns about the potential risks this could bring to validators, arguing that the implementation of this mechanism would increase legal liabilities, particularly for those operating in the U.S. Ethereum’s anti-censorship measures have so far allowed node operators to avoid the inclusion of transactions involving sanctioned services like Tornado Cash, only delaying their processing rather than excluding them entirely.

Soleimani argued that under FOCIL, validators would no longer be able to filter out transactions from sanctioned services. He expressed concern that this could expose U.S. validators to legal risks. Soleimani noted:

Buterin responded to these criticisms by emphasizing that the goal of FOCIL was to protect Ethereum's L1 status as a ”dumb pipe” — a neutral network that only transmits data without controlling it.

Buterin’s Vision: Why Ethereum Must Stay a ‘Dumb Pipe’

Buterin firmly believes that forcing validators to include sanctioned transactions is necessary for Ethereum's long-term health. He stressed that Ethereum's L1 must remain neutral, free from interference by any single entity, including validators. This neutrality is achieved by introducing several safeguards:

  • Ensuring the mempool is stable and functional for simple block creation.
  • Creating non-protocol technologies for distributed block construction.
  • Establishing multiple channels to enable transactions.

FOCIL is one of the latest mechanisms to achieve these goals. Buterin argues that it provides benefits to both validators and attesters, making the latter's work simpler from a technical standpoint.

Can FOCIL Secure Ethereum’s Decentralized Future?

With the potential adoption of EIP-7701, Buterin envisions expanding FOCIL’s capabilities to further eliminate centralized intermediaries. The ultimate goal is to prevent an oligopoly of validators from gaining veto power over which transactions get included in blocks.

In response, Soleimani emphasized that Ethereum was never intended to be a “passive channel.” For him, Buterin’s vision of Ethereum as a neutral pipe is an ideal that fails to reflect the reality of Ethereum’s current status.

Market Opportunity
GET Logo
GET Price(GET)
$0.000931
$0.000931$0.000931
0.00%
USD
GET (GET) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shiba Inu Supply Shrinks as 167,991,300,000 SHIB Exit Exchanges

Shiba Inu Supply Shrinks as 167,991,300,000 SHIB Exit Exchanges

The post Shiba Inu Supply Shrinks as 167,991,300,000 SHIB Exit Exchanges appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. -167,991,300,000 SHIB in exchange netflow Shiba Inu
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/01 04:42
Kan de Solana koers naar $129 door grote SOL ETF instroom en hoge netwerkinkomsten?

Kan de Solana koers naar $129 door grote SOL ETF instroom en hoge netwerkinkomsten?

Solana sluit 2025 af met meer dan $1,5 miljard aan netwerkinkomsten. Daarmee laat het netwerk Ethereum en Hyperliquid samen achter zich. Deze cijfers van Blockworks
Share
Coinstats2026/01/01 03:16
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41