The post Xai Gaming Network sues Elon Musk’s xAI for allegedly copying its name appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ex Populus, developer of the layer-3 network, filed a trademark lawsuit seeking to stop xAI from using the Xai name and similar branding in video game and blockchain contexts. The creators of Xai, a gaming-focused blockchain on Ethereum, have taken Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence venture to court. The complaint asks a federal judge in Northern California to order xAI to avoid words or symbols that could cause confusion. Ex Populus took legal action today to protect the Xai brand. With increased confusion around Elon Musk’s AI company (@xai), it’s a big responsibility to safeguard the brand that the community trusts. You can read more details at https://t.co/ce8Aw9hNCZ — XAI 🎮⛓️ (@XAI_GAMES) August 22, 2025 Musk said in November that xAI would launch an AI video game studio to “make games great again.” Ex Populus says that the announcement triggered “substantial actual confusion” online between its brand and Musk’s plan. The filing says news sites and commentators used the Xai logo in posts about xAI, and many users assumed the two efforts were related. The complaint also says Grok, xAI’s chatbot, mixed up the parties. In replies on X, it reportedly claimed both the Xai blockchain and the xAI gaming push were controlled by Musk’s companies. However, when Cryptopolitan asked Grok about Xai, it made no such claims. Still, Ex Populus argues the confusion has damaged its standing. Company seeks ban on xAI use of Xai name and financial compensation Filed Thursday, the suit asks the court to bar xAI from using any terms or marks likely to be mistaken for the Xai trademark in gaming and blockchain. Ex Populus also seeks punitive damages and to recover all profits that Musk’s companies earned from the alleged misuse. The filing says the infringement has continued since last year and that the controversy… The post Xai Gaming Network sues Elon Musk’s xAI for allegedly copying its name appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ex Populus, developer of the layer-3 network, filed a trademark lawsuit seeking to stop xAI from using the Xai name and similar branding in video game and blockchain contexts. The creators of Xai, a gaming-focused blockchain on Ethereum, have taken Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence venture to court. The complaint asks a federal judge in Northern California to order xAI to avoid words or symbols that could cause confusion. Ex Populus took legal action today to protect the Xai brand. With increased confusion around Elon Musk’s AI company (@xai), it’s a big responsibility to safeguard the brand that the community trusts. You can read more details at https://t.co/ce8Aw9hNCZ — XAI 🎮⛓️ (@XAI_GAMES) August 22, 2025 Musk said in November that xAI would launch an AI video game studio to “make games great again.” Ex Populus says that the announcement triggered “substantial actual confusion” online between its brand and Musk’s plan. The filing says news sites and commentators used the Xai logo in posts about xAI, and many users assumed the two efforts were related. The complaint also says Grok, xAI’s chatbot, mixed up the parties. In replies on X, it reportedly claimed both the Xai blockchain and the xAI gaming push were controlled by Musk’s companies. However, when Cryptopolitan asked Grok about Xai, it made no such claims. Still, Ex Populus argues the confusion has damaged its standing. Company seeks ban on xAI use of Xai name and financial compensation Filed Thursday, the suit asks the court to bar xAI from using any terms or marks likely to be mistaken for the Xai trademark in gaming and blockchain. Ex Populus also seeks punitive damages and to recover all profits that Musk’s companies earned from the alleged misuse. The filing says the infringement has continued since last year and that the controversy…

Xai Gaming Network sues Elon Musk’s xAI for allegedly copying its name

Ex Populus, developer of the layer-3 network, filed a trademark lawsuit seeking to stop xAI from using the Xai name and similar branding in video game and blockchain contexts.

The creators of Xai, a gaming-focused blockchain on Ethereum, have taken Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence venture to court. The complaint asks a federal judge in Northern California to order xAI to avoid words or symbols that could cause confusion.

Musk said in November that xAI would launch an AI video game studio to “make games great again.” Ex Populus says that the announcement triggered “substantial actual confusion” online between its brand and Musk’s plan. The filing says news sites and commentators used the Xai logo in posts about xAI, and many users assumed the two efforts were related.

The complaint also says Grok, xAI’s chatbot, mixed up the parties. In replies on X, it reportedly claimed both the Xai blockchain and the xAI gaming push were controlled by Musk’s companies. However, when Cryptopolitan asked Grok about Xai, it made no such claims.

Still, Ex Populus argues the confusion has damaged its standing.

Company seeks ban on xAI use of Xai name and financial compensation

Filed Thursday, the suit asks the court to bar xAI from using any terms or marks likely to be mistaken for the Xai trademark in gaming and blockchain. Ex Populus also seeks punitive damages and to recover all profits that Musk’s companies earned from the alleged misuse.

The filing says the infringement has continued since last year and that the controversy around Musk has made the harm worse.

Xai calls itself a layer-3 network because it sits atop Arbitrum, an Ethereum layer-2 system. It keeps Arbitrum’s core setup but tunes it for games.

The network offers account abstraction to simplify wallets and accounts, raises gas and smart contract limits for developers, and says it adds parallel processing and other changes for better scale, speed, and lower costs. Those features build on Arbitrum’s optimistic rollups, which move transactions off the Ethereum mainnet to boost throughput and cut fees.

Ex Populus claims longstanding use of the Xai brand before xAI entered the market

Ex Populus says it owns the Xai brand and licenses its use. The team has used the name publicly since at least June 2023 and says the network is used by potentially millions worldwide. The company says confusion grew after xAI entered the spotlight and later signaled plans to get involved in games. After hearing from xAI’s legal team and seeing the effect on users and partners, Ex Populus says it felt compelled to act.

The firm says it could not ignore the overlap because trademark law requires owners to defend their marks or risk losing them. It casts the case as protecting the integrity of its work and the clarity of the brand that gaming communities rely on.

Ex Populus says people began assuming Xai was Musk’s company, and some posts talked about an “Elon’s Xai token.” Others used the blockchain’s logo in content that was actually about xAI.

A reddit post that mistakens Xai as Elon Musk’s xAI token. Source: Ex populus

Ex Populus says the case tests whether smaller builders can keep their identities when big firms enter with similar names. The company says it has invested years of effort and millions of dollars to grow a trusted mark and cannot allow it to be diluted.

It says it respects the courts and does not plan to comment further while the matter is active. The team says it will return to building new video games that use modern technology and will post updates on its site.

KEY Difference Wire helps crypto brands break through and dominate headlines fast

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/ethereum-gaming-network-sues-musks-xai/

Market Opportunity
LETSTOP Logo
LETSTOP Price(STOP)
$0.01493
$0.01493$0.01493
+5.58%
USD
LETSTOP (STOP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

Vet has explained that he has decided to veto the Token Escrow amendment to prevent breaking things
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:28
Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

The post Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment Skip to content Home AI News Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing a New Era of Seller Empowerment Source: https://bitcoinworld.co.in/amazon-ai-seller-tools/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:10
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28