The post A centralized bottleneck caused the global internet blackout today appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A single company’s outage today disrupted access to internet services worldwide, revealing just how much global traffic depends on Cloudflare. Cloudflare’s status page described the event as an “internal service degradation” that began at 11:48 UTC, saying some services were “intermittently impacted” while teams worked to restore traffic flows. Earlier, at 11:34 UTC, CryptoSlate noticed services were reachable at the origin, but Cloudflare’s London edge returned an error page, with similar behavior observed through Frankfurt and Chicago via VPN. That pattern suggests trouble in the edge and application layers rather than at the customer origin servers. Cloudflare confirmed the problem publicly at 11:48 UTC, reporting widespread HTTP 500 errors and problems with its own dashboard and API. NetBlocks, a network watchdog, reported disruptions to a range of online services in multiple countries and attributed the event to Cloudflare technical issues, while stressing that this was not related to state-level blocking or shutdowns. Cloudflare acknowledged a global disruption at approximately 13:03 UTC, followed by a first recovery update at around 13:21 UTC. Its own log of status updates shows how the incident evolved from internal degradation to a broad outage that touched user-facing tools, remote access products, and application services. Time (UTC) Status page update 11:48 Cloudflare reports internal service degradation and intermittent impact 12:03–12:53 Company continues investigation while error rates remain elevated 13:04 WARP access in London disabled during remediation attempts 13:09 Issue marked as identified and fix in progress 13:13 Access and WARP services recover, WARP re-enabled in London 13:35–13:58 Work continues to restore application services for customers 14:34 Dashboard services restored, remediation ongoing for application impact While the exact technical root cause has not yet been publicly detailed, the observable symptoms were consistent across many services that sit behind Cloudflare. Users encountered 500 internal server errors from the… The post A centralized bottleneck caused the global internet blackout today appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A single company’s outage today disrupted access to internet services worldwide, revealing just how much global traffic depends on Cloudflare. Cloudflare’s status page described the event as an “internal service degradation” that began at 11:48 UTC, saying some services were “intermittently impacted” while teams worked to restore traffic flows. Earlier, at 11:34 UTC, CryptoSlate noticed services were reachable at the origin, but Cloudflare’s London edge returned an error page, with similar behavior observed through Frankfurt and Chicago via VPN. That pattern suggests trouble in the edge and application layers rather than at the customer origin servers. Cloudflare confirmed the problem publicly at 11:48 UTC, reporting widespread HTTP 500 errors and problems with its own dashboard and API. NetBlocks, a network watchdog, reported disruptions to a range of online services in multiple countries and attributed the event to Cloudflare technical issues, while stressing that this was not related to state-level blocking or shutdowns. Cloudflare acknowledged a global disruption at approximately 13:03 UTC, followed by a first recovery update at around 13:21 UTC. Its own log of status updates shows how the incident evolved from internal degradation to a broad outage that touched user-facing tools, remote access products, and application services. Time (UTC) Status page update 11:48 Cloudflare reports internal service degradation and intermittent impact 12:03–12:53 Company continues investigation while error rates remain elevated 13:04 WARP access in London disabled during remediation attempts 13:09 Issue marked as identified and fix in progress 13:13 Access and WARP services recover, WARP re-enabled in London 13:35–13:58 Work continues to restore application services for customers 14:34 Dashboard services restored, remediation ongoing for application impact While the exact technical root cause has not yet been publicly detailed, the observable symptoms were consistent across many services that sit behind Cloudflare. Users encountered 500 internal server errors from the…

A centralized bottleneck caused the global internet blackout today

2025/11/18 23:43
Okuma süresi: 6 dk

A single company’s outage today disrupted access to internet services worldwide, revealing just how much global traffic depends on Cloudflare.

Cloudflare’s status page described the event as an “internal service degradation” that began at 11:48 UTC, saying some services were “intermittently impacted” while teams worked to restore traffic flows.

Earlier, at 11:34 UTC, CryptoSlate noticed services were reachable at the origin, but Cloudflare’s London edge returned an error page, with similar behavior observed through Frankfurt and Chicago via VPN. That pattern suggests trouble in the edge and application layers rather than at the customer origin servers.

Cloudflare confirmed the problem publicly at 11:48 UTC, reporting widespread HTTP 500 errors and problems with its own dashboard and API.

NetBlocks, a network watchdog, reported disruptions to a range of online services in multiple countries and attributed the event to Cloudflare technical issues, while stressing that this was not related to state-level blocking or shutdowns.

Cloudflare acknowledged a global disruption at approximately 13:03 UTC, followed by a first recovery update at around 13:21 UTC.

Its own log of status updates shows how the incident evolved from internal degradation to a broad outage that touched user-facing tools, remote access products, and application services.

Time (UTC)Status page update
11:48Cloudflare reports internal service degradation and intermittent impact
12:03–12:53Company continues investigation while error rates remain elevated
13:04WARP access in London disabled during remediation attempts
13:09Issue marked as identified and fix in progress
13:13Access and WARP services recover, WARP re-enabled in London
13:35–13:58Work continues to restore application services for customers
14:34Dashboard services restored, remediation ongoing for application impact

While the exact technical root cause has not yet been publicly detailed, the observable symptoms were consistent across many services that sit behind Cloudflare.

Users encountered 500 internal server errors from the Cloudflare edge, front-end dashboards failed for customers, and API access used to manage configurations also broke. In practice, both users and administrators lost access at the same time.

The downstream impact was broad.

Users of X (formerly known as Twitter) reported login failures with messages such as “Oops, something went wrong. Please try again later.”

Access problems were also seen across ChatGPT, Slack, Coinbase, Perplexity, Claude, and other high-traffic sites, with many pages either timing out or returning error codes.

Some services appeared to degrade rather than go completely offline, with partial loading or regional pockets of normal behavior depending on routing. The incident did not shut down the entire internet, but it removed a sizable portion of what many users interact with each day.

The outage also made itself felt in a more subtle layer: visibility. At the same time that users tried to reach X or ChatGPT, many turned to outage-tracking sites to see if the problem sat with their own connection or with the platforms.

However, monitoring portals that track incidents, such as DownDetector, Downforeveryoneorjustme, and isitdownrightnow, also experienced problems. OutageStats reported that its own data showed Cloudflare “working fine” while acknowledging that isolated failures were possible, which contrasted with user experience on Cloudflare-backed sites.

Some status trackers relied on Cloudflare themselves, which made identifying the issue extremely difficult.

For crypto and Web3, this episode is less about one vendor’s bad day and more about a structural bottleneck.

Cloudflare’s network sits in front of a large fraction of the public web, handling DNS, TLS termination, caching, web application firewall functions, and access controls.

Cloudflare provides services for around 19% of all websites.

A failure in that shared layer turns into simultaneous trouble for exchanges, DeFi front ends, NFT marketplaces, portfolio trackers, and media sites that made the same choice of provider.

In practice, the event drew a line between platforms with their own backbone-scale infrastructure and those that rely heavily on Cloudflare.

Services from Google, Amazon, and other tech giants with in-house CDNs mainly appeared unaffected.

Smaller or mid-sized sites that outsource edge delivery saw more visible impact. For crypto, this maps directly onto the long-running tension between decentralized protocols and centralized access layers.

A protocol may run across thousands of nodes, yet a single outage in a CDN or DNS provider can block user access to the interface that most people actually use.

Furthermore, even if crypto were to rely solely on decentralized CDN and DNS services, if the rest of the internet is barely functioning, there would be nowhere to spend your tokens.

Cloudflare’s history shows that this is not an isolated anomaly. A control plane and analytics outage in November 2023 affected multiple services for nearly two days, starting at 11:43 UTC on November 2 and resolving on November 4 after changes to internal systems.

Status aggregation by StatusGator lists multiple Cloudflare incidents in recent years across DNS, application services, and management consoles.

Each time, the impact reaches beyond Cloudflare’s direct customer list into the dependent ecosystem that assumes that layer will stay up.

Today’s incident also underlined how control planes can become a hidden point of failure.

That meant customers could not easily change DNS records, switch traffic to backup origins, or relax edge security settings to route around the trouble. Even where origin infrastructure was healthy, some operators were effectively locked out of the steering wheel while their sites returned errors.

From a risk perspective, the outage exposed three distinct layers of dependence.

  1. User traffic is concentrated through one edge provider.
  2. Observability relies on tools that, in many cases, are used by the same provider, which can mute or distort insights during the event.
  3. Operational control for customers is centralized in a dashboard and API that shares the same failure domain.

Crypto teams have long discussed multi-region redundancy for validator nodes and backup RPC providers. This event adds weight to a parallel conversation about multi-CDN, diverse DNS, and self-hosted entry points for key services.

Projects that pair on-chain decentralization with single-vendor front ends not only face censorship and regulatory risk, but they also inherit the operational outages of that vendor.

Still, cost and complexity shape real infrastructure decisions. Multi-CDN setups, alternative DNS networks, or decentralized storage for front ends can reduce single points of failure, yet they demand more engineering and operational work than pointing a domain at one popular provider.

For many teams, especially during bull cycles when traffic spikes, outsourcing edge delivery to Cloudflare or a similar platform is the most straightforward way to survive volume.

The Cloudflare event today gives a concrete data point in that tradeoff.

Widespread 500 errors, failures in both public-facing sites and internal dashboards, blind spots in monitoring, and regionally varied recovery together showed how a private network can act as a chokepoint for much of the public internet.

For now, the outage has been contained to a matter of hours, but it leaves crypto and broader web infrastructure operators with a clear record of how a single provider can interrupt day-to-day access to core online services.

As of press time, services appear stable, and Cloudflare has implemented a fix stating,

Mentioned in this article

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/the-internet-is-broken-a-centralized-bottleneck-caused-the-global-internet-blackout-today/

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Paylaş
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Knocking Bitcoin's lack of yield shows your ‘Western financial privilege’

Knocking Bitcoin's lack of yield shows your ‘Western financial privilege’

                                                                               Macro analyst Luke Gromen’s comments come amid an ongoing debate over whether Bitcoin or Ether is the more attractive long-term option for traditional investors.                     Macro analyst Luke Gromen says the fact that Bitcoin doesn’t natively earn yield isn’t a weakness; it’s what makes it a safer store of value.“If you’re earning a yield, you are taking a risk,” Gromen told Natalie Brunell on the Coin Stories podcast on Wednesday, responding to a question about critics who dismiss Bitcoin (BTC) because they prefer yield-earning assets.“Anyone who says that is showing their Western financial privilege,” he added.Read more
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 14:22
Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how

Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how

The post Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Journalist Posted: February 16, 2026
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 11:01