In 2025, global financial markets are entering a phase increasingly defined by speculation and excess liquidity. Traditional economic theory suggests that asset prices should be driven byIn 2025, global financial markets are entering a phase increasingly defined by speculation and excess liquidity. Traditional economic theory suggests that asset prices should be driven by

新手學院/Featured Content/Will Bitcoi...Macro Risks

Will Bitcoin Peak in September? Liquidity Bubbles and Macro Risks

作者：MEXC

Aug 22, 2025MEXC

#Bitcoin (BTC)#Intermediate

4$0.022693+1.72%

BANK$0.03337-7.48%

M$1.50473-7.73%

In 2025, global financial markets are entering a phase increasingly defined by speculation and excess liquidity. Traditional economic theory suggests that asset prices should be driven by fundamentals such as productivity, profitability, or cash flow. Yet in today's macro environment, valuations are more often dictated by liquidity, the sheer availability of capital. This is especially evident in the cryptocurrency market, where BTC's price is not only closely tied to macroeconomic conditions but also serves as a key gauge of global liquidity.

According to MEXC data, BTC climbed to a high of 116,938.7 USDT in the past 24 hours and is now trading at 114,808.0 USDT. After reaching a new all-time high, BTC has moved into a phase of correction and consolidation, hovering around 115,000 USDT. Against this backdrop, whether BTC will mark its cycle top in September 2025 has become a central focus of market discussion.

1. On-Chain and Market Indicators: Approaching the Risk Zone

When assessing whether BTC is nearing the top, on-chain data and market structure often provide the most direct signals. Compared with the broader macro-liquidity environment, these indicators reflect investor behavior and market sentiment more closely. At present, several key metrics suggest that the market is entering a potential risk zone.

1.1 MVRV Indicator Enters the "Moderate Risk Zone"

According to a report cited by Cointelegraph, sentiment analytics platform Santiment noted that BTC's market value to realized value (MVRV) ratio has reached +21%. This metric gauges the aggregate profit and loss position of investors. Historically, when MVRV falls within the 15%-25% range, the market tends to enter a moderate risk zone, where a large share of investors begin to have incentives to realize profits. While this does not necessarily signal an immediate sell-off, it indicates that BTC's upside is becoming more limited and the risk-reward balance is shifting.

1.2 Signs of a Double-Top Formation

According to Coin World, recent technical charts show that BTC has encountered significant resistance around $122,000, with multiple failed attempts to break higher. This points to a potential double-top pattern. A double-top is typically a trend reversal signal: two similar highs are separated by a trough that forms the neckline, and once the price closes below the neckline, the formation is confirmed, often signaling the start of a downward move. At present, the neckline is around $111,982. A confirmed close below this level would substantially reinforce the bearish technical outlook.

1.3 Capital Flows and Derivatives Signals

On the other hand, ETF inflows and stablecoin demand remain resilient, indicating that institutional and retail capital has not fully withdrawn. Options skew also suggests that concerns over a sharp downside are limited, implying that BTC still retains potential for a rebound or further upward move in the short term.

Spot Bitcoin ETF Net Flows. Source: CoinGlass

2. Liquidity Patterns: The History and Logic of a September Cycle Top

Over the past several decades, fiscal and monetary policies have jointly worked to maintain an anchoring effect on the economy. But the reality in 2025 shows a very different picture:

Persistent fiscal deficits: Even under conditions of full employment, the U.S. is running a deficit equal to 7% of GDP.
High rates alongside asset bubbles: Despite interest rates at 5%, BTC remains near all-time highs.
Fiscal dominance over monetary policy: Fiscal stimulus continues even during periods of economic expansion.

This policy mix has gradually pushed markets away from fundamentals, with liquidity emerging as the primary driver of price fluctuations.

2.1 Halving Cycles and the Timing Window

Historically, BTC has tended to peak around 525-530 days after each halving event:

2013: 525 days
2017: 530 days
2021: 518 days

By this measure, the 525th day following the 2024 halving falls in late September 2025, aligning closely with current market expectations of a potential September cycle top. At that point, BTC could reach between $135,000 and $150,000.

2.2 Correlation Between M2 Growth and Bitcoin Price Trends

Research by analyst MintedMacro highlights a strong correlation between BTC's price and global M2 money supply. When M2 expands or remains elevated, BTC has typically shown strong performance. However, M2 now appears to have formed a double-top structure, with the second peak lower than the first, suggesting that liquidity may be approaching an inflection point.

2.3 Liquidations and Liquidity Release

If BTC's price were to rise by another ~10% in the short term, it could trigger over $13 billion in short positions being liquidated, resulting in a liquidity-driven cascade short squeeze. This mechanism implies that near-term upside could be sharp and aggressive, but also increases the likelihood of a reversal once extreme levels are reached.

3. Macro Risks: Liquidity as a Bottleneck

Beyond liquidity itself, broader macro factors are also exerting a significant influence on BTC's price.

3.1 Federal Reserve Policy Expectations

The market widely expects that the Federal Reserve may cut rates within the year, adding to short-term uncertainty and volatility in BTC. Rate cuts can act as a catalyst for further upside, but they can also amplify the scale of corrections if the macro trend reverses.

History shows a strong link between shifts in Fed policy and BTC price cycles. In 2013, liquidity easing helped BTC break above $1,000 for the first time. During the 2014-2016 period, as QE ended and the Fed entered a rate-hike cycle, BTC fell into a prolonged bear market, bottoming near the $200 range. When global liquidity eased again in 2017, BTC entered its second bull run, reaching a high of $20,000. Similarly, the ultra-loose policy response to the pandemic in 2020 ignited BTC's historic bull market. These patterns highlight how BTC's price cycles remain closely tied to the Fed's liquidity environment, a relationship that continues to warrant close attention in 2025.

3.2 Divergence in Global Central Bank Policies

Some emerging markets have already begun cutting rates, while developed economies remain cautious. For example, the central banks of Japan, Canada, Brazil, Colombia, and Singapore have kept rates unchanged, whereas Chile and South Africa moved ahead with 25-basis-point cuts amid easing inflation and weakening growth. In the Eurozone, second-quarter GDP came in slightly above expectations with 0.1% quarter-on-quarter growth, but core inflation held steady at 2.3% year-on-year, suggesting the European Central Bank will maintain a cautious stance.

3.3 Continued Institutional Inflows

Large institutions such as Tether and Strategy have expanded their BTC and ETH holdings, amplifying the leverage effect on market volatility. According to BitcoinTreasuries.net, institutions including corporations, governments, ETFs, and exchanges, currently hold around 3.64 million BTC, equivalent to about 17% of total supply, with an aggregate value of approximately $428 billion. This underscores the scale of capital entering the market.

Data from Coingecko shows that Strategy holds roughly 629,000 BTC, representing about 3% of global circulating supply, giving it substantial influence over market sentiment and price swings. Other major holders include Marathon (about 50,600 BTC), XXI Capital (about 43,500 BTC), and Coinbase (about 11,700 BTC). Collectively, these positions contribute to a new wave of supply-side pressure. On one hand, this concentration amplifies scarcity and volatility; on the other, it provides a degree of long-term capital support for BTC.

3.4 Fiscal and Debt Structure

The U.S. Treasury has recently shown a preference for issuing short-term Treasuries (T-bills), which has somewhat reduced the appeal of fixed-income assets and benefited risk assets, including BTC. However, if fiscal deficits continue to climb, questions around sustainability may emerge, weighing on investor sentiment.

Together, these dynamics outline a market environment characterized by liquidity dominance and distorted fundamentals.

4. How Should Investors Respond?

In the current environment of heightened speculation and liquidity-driven markets, traditional static holding strategies are increasingly inadequate for navigating sharp volatility. Investors need to reassess and refine their decision-making frameworks across several dimensions:

Monitor liquidity indicators: Global M2 changes remain highly correlated with BTC's price.

Beware of short squeeze effects: Rapid price surges are often accompanied by large-scale liquidations, which can magnify subsequent corrections.

Manage policy expectations: Whether through Federal Reserve rate decisions or fiscal stimulus measures, policy direction directly impacts liquidity curves and risk appetite. Investors should conduct multi-scenario analysis in advance to avoid being caught off guard by policy shifts.

Adopt dynamic position management: In extreme market conditions, flexible position sizing and stop-loss mechanisms provide greater protection than passively holding long-term. Dynamic management can help reduce drawdowns while also capturing incremental gains amid volatility.

To manage risk more effectively, investors can make full use of the stop-loss and take-profit orders available on the MEXC platform. By setting take-profit levels, profits can be locked in and protected from being eroded during corrections. At the same time, clearly defined stop-loss levels help contain downside risk by exiting positions before losses deepen. MEXC offers flexible stop-loss and take-profit tools, allowing users to adjust trigger prices and execution prices according to their own risk tolerance and market conditions. Applying these tools effectively is key to protecting capital, improving trading efficiency, and navigating volatile or trend-reversing markets with greater confidence.

5. Conclusion

Taken together, signals of liquidity topping out, the halving cycle window, macro risks, and overheated sentiment all contribute to the logic behind a potential September cycle top for BTC. While the long-term outlook remains constructive, in the short term the market may first experience a liquidity-driven push higher, followed by a period of risk release and correction.

For investors, the real challenge is not pinpointing the exact top, but maintaining discipline through liquidity cycles and holding a stable long-term footing amid waves of speculation. A potential September peak for BTC may feel like a celebration, but what follows the celebration could prove to be the true test.

熱門新聞

從稀缺交易到估值紀律：SpaceX的回調考驗OpenAI的IPO野心

據報導，OpenAI 傾向將其 IPO 推遲至 2027 年，但更強烈的市場訊號來自 SpaceX。SpaceX 於 6 月 22 日收盤下跌了 16.4%，收於 154.60 美元，較盤中高點 225.64 美元降低了 31.5%，但仍較其 135 美元的 IPO 價格高出 14.5%。這一走勢使 SpaceX 從一個由稀缺性驅動的 IPO 成功案例，轉變為 AI 相關超大型上市週期中首個重大公

2026-06-29

Coldcard Mk3 警告隨 $38M Bitcoin 掃蕩而來，但原因仍未確認

比特幣硬體錢包製造商 Coinkite 已警告用戶，Coldcard 裝置存在種子生成問題，影響範圍涵蓋所有 4.0.1 及更高版本的 Mk3 韌體。此警告是在安全研究人員調查一宗涉及 594.48 BTC（價值約 3,800 萬美元）的協調性盜取事件時出現的。然而，目前尚無公開的技術證據證實 Coldcard 的問題導致了這些轉帳。

2026-07-31

Mastercard 完成對 BVNK 的收購，金額高達 18 億美元——穩定幣進入全球支付核心

Mastercard 於三月宣布該交易後，已於 2026 年 8 月 3 日（UTC +8）完成對穩定幣基礎設施供應商 BVNK 的收購。

2026-08-04

去中心化交易所與中心化交易所現貨交易量比率達24%，中心化交易所活動走弱

根據 The Block 目前的數據系列，2026 年 7 月去中心化交易所現貨交易量與中心化交易所現貨交易量的比率達到 24.14%。該數字並不意味著 DEX 控制了合併現貨市場的 24.14%：這意味著 DEX 交易量相當於數據集中包含的 CEX 交易量的 24.14%。同時，DEX 現貨交易量月減約 26%，降至約 1307.7 億美元，創下近兩年來的最低水準。

2026-08-04

WTI 原油價格下跌 2%，跌破 $81：交易者應關注什麼

WTI 原油價格盤中一度下跌 2%，並跌破每桶 $81，使 OIL(WTI) 在由中東風險、庫存頭條以及宏觀預期變化推動的劇烈波動行情後，再次承受壓力。這一走勢不僅是正常的日內回調。它顯示原油交易者在兩個相互競爭的敘事之間切換得有多快：一邊是供應中斷風險，另一邊是需求疲軟。重點在於，WTI 下跌並不是因為地緣政治風險消失了。它下跌是因為交易員開始質疑：在最新一輪上漲之後，這些風險還應該有多少被計入

作者：Marcus O'Brien

2026-07-31

AMZN 股票在財報公布後大漲: 亞馬遜的 AI 支出終於開始見效了嗎？

AMZN 股票在亞馬遜 2026 年第 2 季財報公布後跳漲，因投資者對 AWS 更快的成長、更強的零售執行力、上升的廣告收入，以及規模大得多的 AI 支出計畫作出反應。對於關注 AMZNUSDT 的交易者而言，關鍵問題已不再是亞馬遜是否在 AI 上激進投入。顯然是。真正的問題是，這些支出是否開始產生足夠的成長，以證明其成本合理。亞馬遜公佈 2026 年第二季營收約 $200.6 billion，

作者：Marcus O'Brien

2026-07-31

AI 科技板塊是否正在進入熊市？

AI 科技板塊正承受真正的壓力。半導體股票遭遇了今年最劇烈的回調之一，納斯達克-100 已接近回調區間，交易者也在質疑，推升英偉達USDT 和三倍做多半導體USDT 的 AI 交易是否終於走得太遠。明確的答案是這樣：AI 交易的部分領域已經處於熊市，但更廣泛的 AI 技術週期尚未明確破裂。這種區分很重要。一個板塊可以在不結束底層商業週期的情況下，經歷劇烈的估值重置。到 2026 年 7 月下旬

作者：Emma Williams

2026-07-31

CXMT 股票飆升逾 13%，市值突破 ¥4 兆

長鑫存儲科技（ChangXin Memory Technologies），廣為人知的 CXMT，盤中飆升逾 13%，將其總市值推升至 ¥4 兆以上，並使 CXMTUSDT 再次回到中國半導體交易的中心。此舉延續了今年最戲劇性的 A 股首秀之一，此前 CXMT 以 ¥8.66 的 IPO 價格在上海科創板已上線，並在首個交易日平倉於 ¥49，使其市值約為 ¥3.28 兆。突破 ¥4 兆改變了市場敘事

作者：Oliver Hughes

2026-07-31