What Is Ten Protocol (TEN)? 2026 Price Prediction

The post What Time Is The Big Ten Championship? How To Watch Indiana Vs. Ohio State appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. INDIANAPOLIS, IN – DECEMBER 07: A general view of the field as players warm up for the Big Ten Championship football game between the Penn State Nittany Lions and the Oregon Ducks on December 7, 2024, at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, Indiana. (Photo by Michael Allio/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images) Icon Sportswire via Getty Images The last two remaining undefeated teams in Div. I college football face off Saturday night in the Big Ten Championship Game. Indiana vs. Ohio State will meet at Lucas Oil Stadium, home of the Indianapolis Colts. Since the inception of the Big Ten Championship Game in 2011, the Buckeyes (12-0) have won the most conference titles (5) of any school, including four straight from 2017 to 2020. They also have the most Big Ten Championship Game appearances at seven. Meanwhile, the Hoosiers (12-0) have never played in the conference championship until this weekend in Indianapolis. More Details On Indiana Vs. Ohio State The No. 1 Buckeyes, which have won 29 consecutive games against the No. 2 Hoosiers, lead the all-time series with an 82-12-5 record dating back to the programs’ first matchup in 1901— Indiana last won against Ohio State in 1988. Saturday’s game marks the fifth time in the series that both programs are ranked nationally in the top 25. Ohio State and Indiana most recently played each other on Nov. 23, 2024, with the Buckeyes winning 38-15 at Ohio Stadium. The Hoosiers are coached by Curt Cignetti, who reportedly signed an eight-year contract extension this fall said to be worth over $90 million, making him among college football’s top 20 highest-paid coaches. Meanwhile, Ohio State’s Ryan Day — who has a 82-10 record in Columbus over eight seasons — ranks as the second highest-paid coach in Div. I college football behind Georgia’s…

Bitcoin may be sliding into a new bear phase unless fresh macro liquidity – particularly through spot ETFs – returns to the market, according to CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju. Bitcoin Bear Market Incoming? Sharing a composite on-chain dashboard overlaid on the BTC price, Ju wrote on X: “Most Bitcoin on-chain indicators are bearish. Without macro liquidity, we enter a bear cycle.” The chart stacks ten CryptoQuant metrics behind the price in a red-to-green heatmap from 2021 to 2025, highlighting how regime shifts in prior cycles coincided with clusters of bearish readings. Related Reading: US Sen. Lummis Hints At US Bitcoin Buy With ‘Franklin’ Meme The indicators in the panel include the MVRV Z-score, CryptoQuant P&L Index, the Bull-Bear Cycle Indicator, Inter-Exchange Flow Pulse, Network Activity Index, Stablecoin Liquidity, Bitcoin Demand Growth, Trader On-chain Profit Margin, Trader Realized Price and a Technical Signal metric. When the majority are bullish, the backdrop turns light green; when they flip bearish, it shifts to red. In the latest section of the chart, as BTC has pulled back from its highs, red once again dominates – the visual basis for Ju’s warning. For the next major move, Ju argues that on-chain data is now subordinate to macro conditions and ETF flows. Quoting his own post, he wrote: “It is simple. If you think macro gets better next year, you buy. Otherwise, you sell. I’m not a macro expert, so find macro bros. New ETF inflows are the key.” That line pinpoints what he believes can “save” Bitcoin from a deeper drawdown: renewed demand from spot ETFs as a conduit for institutional capital. In earlier stages of the cycle, rising ETF inflows coincided with strong price appreciation; more recently, slowing or negative flows have mirrored the loss of upward momentum. Ju frames the current environment as one that demands flexible scenario management rather than rigid forecasts. “At this stage, it is more about being reactive than predictive. Set your scenarios and trade accordingly,” he told followers. The composite chart is designed for exactly that purpose, showing how past bull tops and bear markets aligned with persistent stretches of red across profit, valuation and liquidity metrics. Related Reading: Bitcoin And The 2026 Fed Shift: Expert Says Markets Aren’t Ready Despite the bearish tilt, Ju does not foresee a repeat of the 2022 collapse, when Bitcoin fell roughly 65% from peak to trough. He cites the behaviour of Michael Saylor led Strategy as a stabilizing factor. “If Strategy holds its 650K BTC this cycle (or sells only a little), we would not see another -65% drawdown like in 2022,” he wrote. In his view, that supply remaining largely off the market reduces the probability of a violent deleveraging event. Ju characterizes the current pullback as substantial but not extreme in historical context. “We are about -25% from ATH now, and even if a bear cycle comes, the downside would likely be smaller and look more like a broad sideways range,” he argued, suggesting that prolonged consolidation is more likely than a single dramatic crash. His message to long-term investors is explicitly calming. “Long-term holders should avoid panic selling,” he advised. While cyclical on-chain indicators flash red, he insists the structural backdrop has improved: “Bitcoin has more liquidity channels now, so the long-term outlook is obviously strong, imo.” Those channels include ETFs and a deeper institutional market structure than in prior cycles. At press time, Bitcoin traded at $92,494. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

PANews reported on December 5th that Eli Ben-Sasson, CEO of Starknet and co-founder of Zcash, posted on the X platform that in his first conversation with Michael Saylor, founder and executive chairman of Strategy, he outlined Starknet's mission: to drive the development of the Bitcoin economy. Another topic they discussed was privacy. Saylor argued that Bitcoin should not have privacy features, at least not a privacy model similar to Zcash, as this would give sovereign states a reason to ban it. Ben-Sasson disagreed. He believes a balance can be struck: providing privacy while allowing access to the keys. They also exchanged views on OP_CAT. Saylor worried that there would be too many changes, too quickly. But Ben-Sasson disagreed, believing that OP_CAT had already undergone extensive debate and research, and ten years was more than enough time; there was no need to delay it for hundreds of years.