TLDR Amazon filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI on Tuesday to stop its Comet shopping agent from making purchases on Amazon’s platform Amazon claims Perplexity’s agent accessed customer accounts without proper disclosure and disguised automated activity as human browsing Perplexity called Amazon a bully and said the company is trying to stifle competition and limit [...] The post Amazon (AMZN) Stock: Company Takes Legal Action Against Perplexity Over AI Shopping Agent appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Amazon filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI on Tuesday to stop its Comet shopping agent from making purchases on Amazon’s platform Amazon claims Perplexity’s agent accessed customer accounts without proper disclosure and disguised automated activity as human browsing Perplexity called Amazon a bully and said the company is trying to stifle competition and limit [...] The post Amazon (AMZN) Stock: Company Takes Legal Action Against Perplexity Over AI Shopping Agent appeared first on CoinCentral.

Amazon (AMZN) Stock: Company Takes Legal Action Against Perplexity Over AI Shopping Agent

2025/11/05 17:52

TLDR

  • Amazon filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI on Tuesday to stop its Comet shopping agent from making purchases on Amazon’s platform
  • Amazon claims Perplexity’s agent accessed customer accounts without proper disclosure and disguised automated activity as human browsing
  • Perplexity called Amazon a bully and said the company is trying to stifle competition and limit user choice in AI assistants
  • Amazon accused Perplexity of ignoring repeated requests to stop using the agent and creating security risks for customer data
  • The case could set important precedents for how AI agents interact with websites and perform tasks on behalf of users

Amazon filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI in San Francisco federal court on Tuesday. The complaint demands the startup stop its Comet browser agent from making purchases on Amazon’s platform.

The lawsuit marks the latest battle between traditional tech companies and AI startups. It comes after Amazon sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity last Friday.

Amazon claims Perplexity’s Comet agent secretly accessed customer accounts. The company says the startup disguised automated activity as regular human browsing.


AMZN Stock Card
Amazon.com, Inc., AMZN

The retailer argues this creates security risks for customer data. Amazon also says Perplexity ignored multiple requests to stop the practice.

According to court documents, Perplexity configured its system to hide the agent’s activities. Amazon stated the startup was not transparent about when Comet was shopping on behalf of real people.

Perplexity pushed back hard against the allegations. The startup’s spokesperson called Amazon a bully following the lawsuit filing.

The company wrote in a blog post that Amazon was using legal threats to block innovation. Perplexity said users should be able to choose their preferred AI assistant for shopping.

The Technical Details Behind the Dispute

Amazon’s terms of service prohibit data mining, robots, and similar automated tools. The company first asked Perplexity to stop using shopping agents in November 2024.

Perplexity initially complied with that request. However, by August 2025, the startup deployed its new Comet browser agent.

This time, Comet identified itself as a Google Chrome browser user. When Amazon tried to block the bots, Perplexity released a new version to bypass the security measures.

Amazon accused Perplexity of violating its terms by failing to disclose when Comet shops for users. The retailer argues third-party apps should operate openly and respect business decisions.

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas defended the company’s approach. He said agents should have the same rights as human users.

Srinivas argued it’s not Amazon’s job to determine the difference. He claimed Comet doesn’t train or scrape information from Amazon.

The startup says user credentials stay stored locally and never reach Perplexity’s servers. Perplexity also accused Amazon of trying to protect its advertising business.

AI Agents and the Future of Shopping

The dispute highlights questions about how AI agents will interact with websites. Both companies are developing their own AI shopping tools.

Amazon offers Buy For Me, which lets shoppers purchase from brand sites within its app. The company also has Rufus, an AI assistant that recommends products and manages carts.

CEO Andy Jassy discussed AI shopping agents on a recent earnings call. He said the customer experience wasn’t good yet due to lack of personalization.

Jassy mentioned Amazon was having conversations with third-party agent builders. He suggested the company would find ways to partner with some services.

The lawsuit could establish legal boundaries for AI agents. It may determine how far these tools can go in performing real-world tasks.

Perplexity has faced similar controversies before. Publishers accused the company of using their content without permission.

The startup was also accused of buying illegally scraped data from Reddit. Perplexity previously said it fights for users’ rights to access public knowledge.

The company is valued at $20 billion. It counts Amazon Web Services as a major customer with hundreds of millions in commitments.

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has invested in Perplexity. The startup uses Amazon’s cloud infrastructure for its AI operations.

The post Amazon (AMZN) Stock: Company Takes Legal Action Against Perplexity Over AI Shopping Agent appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

A ‘Detonation’ May Be Next, Analyst Says

A ‘Detonation’ May Be Next, Analyst Says

The post A ‘Detonation’ May Be Next, Analyst Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. They say journalists never truly clock out. But for Christian, that’s not just a metaphor, it’s a lifestyle. By day, he navigates the ever-shifting tides of the cryptocurrency market, wielding words like a seasoned editor and crafting articles that decipher the jargon for the masses. When the PC goes on hibernate mode, however, his pursuits take a more mechanical (and sometimes philosophical) turn. Christian’s journey with the written word began long before the age of Bitcoin. In the hallowed halls of academia, he honed his craft as a feature writer for his college paper. This early love for storytelling paved the way for a successful stint as an editor at a data engineering firm, where his first-month essay win funded a months-long supply of doggie and kitty treats – a testament to his dedication to his furry companions (more on that later). Christian then roamed the world of journalism, working at newspapers in Canada and even South Korea. He finally settled down at a local news giant in his hometown in the Philippines for a decade, becoming a total news junkie. But then, something new caught his eye: cryptocurrency. It was like a treasure hunt mixed with storytelling – right up his alley! So, he landed a killer gig at NewsBTC, where he’s one of the go-to guys for all things crypto. He breaks down this confusing stuff into bite-sized pieces, making it easy for anyone to understand (he salutes his management team for teaching him this skill). Think Christian’s all work and no play? Not a chance! When he’s not at his computer, you’ll find him indulging his passion for motorbikes. A true gearhead, Christian loves tinkering with his bike and savoring the joy of the open road on his 320-cc Yamaha R3. Once a speed demon who hit…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 05:20
Maryland Man Sentenced for Allegedly Aiding North Korea’s US Company Infiltration and Sensitive Data Access

Maryland Man Sentenced for Allegedly Aiding North Korea’s US Company Infiltration and Sensitive Data Access

The post Maryland Man Sentenced for Allegedly Aiding North Korea’s US Company Infiltration and Sensitive Data Access appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. North Korea’s IT workers infiltrated US companies through a Maryland man’s scheme, earning over $970,000 while enabling access to sensitive government systems. This operation supported the regime’s cyber activities, including crypto hacks that stole $2 billion in 2025, funding nuclear programs. Minh Phuong Ngoc Vong sentenced to 15 months in prison for aiding North Korean infiltration. He used fake credentials to secure jobs at 13 US firms, passing work to overseas conspirators. North Korea stole $2 billion in crypto in 2025 via hacks, totaling over $6 billion recently, per blockchain analytics firm Elliptic. Discover how North Korea’s IT infiltration and crypto hacking schemes threaten US security. Learn the details of the Maryland case and regime’s $6B theft. Stay informed on cybersecurity risks today. What is North Korea’s IT Infiltration Scheme in US Companies? North Korea’s IT infiltration scheme involves covertly placing regime-affiliated workers into US companies using fake identities to generate revenue and access sensitive systems. In a recent Maryland case, Minh Phuong Ngoc Vong was sentenced to 15 months in prison and three years of supervised release for facilitating this for three years across 13 companies. The operation netted over $970,000, much of which funded North Korea’s weapons programs through software work performed by overseas actors, including those in China near the border. How Does North Korea Use Crypto Hacking to Fund Its Programs? North Korea employs sophisticated cyber groups to target cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets, stealing digital assets that convert to fiat for regime funding. According to blockchain analytics firm Elliptic, these groups pilfered approximately $2 billion in cryptocurrencies in 2025 alone, contributing to a total exceeding $6 billion in recent years from hacks on platforms like Bybit and Upbit. This influx directly supports nuclear and missile development, as confirmed by US intelligence assessments. Experts note the regime’s…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 09:12