A viral post claimed Solana lost 84% of its validators, but Anatoly Yakovenko says the real drop is ~20% and tied to a subsidy program ending, not a network collapseA viral post claimed Solana lost 84% of its validators, but Anatoly Yakovenko says the real drop is ~20% and tied to a subsidy program ending, not a network collapse

Solana validator debate flares as founder rebuts 84% node-collapse claim

A viral post claimed Solana lost 84% of its validators, but Anatoly Yakovenko says the real drop is ~20% and tied to a subsidy program ending, not a network collapse.

Summary
  • A social post alleging an 84% plunge in Solana validators sparked fresh centralization fears, comparing SOL to a “centralized database.”​
  • Yakovenko countered that validator participation fell closer to 20% after the Solana Foundation’s Delegation Program wound down.​
  • He stressed the difference between validators and full nodes, claiming roughly 5,000 Solana full nodes versus 8,300 on Ethereum despite ETH’s much larger market cap.

A dispute over Solana’s (SOL) validator count and network decentralization emerged over the weekend after a post claiming an 84% drop in validators circulated widely on social media.

Solana validator debate flares as founder rebuts 84% node-collapse claim - 1

Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko disputed the claim, stating the actual decline in validator participation was closer to 20% over the past 12 months, according to his public response.

Yakovenko also contested the post’s conflation of validators and full nodes, writing that “Validators are not full nodes.” According to Yakovenko, Solana operates approximately 5,000 full nodes, compared to 8,300 full nodes on the Ethereum blockchain, which has a market capitalization four times larger than Solana’s.

The decline in Solana nodes was attributed to the conclusion of the Solana Foundation Delegation Program (SFDP), a one-year bootstrap initiative that covered voting costs for small validators, according to Yakovenko’s explanation.

Critics continued to question Solana’s decentralization despite the corrections, with comparisons to centralized databases persisting. One social media user claimed operating costs of $20 million per validator prevented broader participation, though this figure could not be independently verified.

Operating a self-hosted, fully validating Solana node requires substantial financial resources, according to industry reports. Hardware costs begin in the hundreds of dollars and can reach thousands, while voting costs can push annual expenses into the tens of thousands of dollars, according to node operators.

Some Solana validators stake millions of dollars worth of tokens and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on operational costs, according to industry participants. Multiple startups have been developing solutions to enable network verification on consumer-grade hardware and home internet connections, though such products remain in alpha testing phases.

Market Opportunity
NODE Logo
NODE Price(NODE)
$0.01472
$0.01472$0.01472
-0.80%
USD
NODE (NODE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.