Roughly 70% of financial institutions worldwide are now investing in fintech partnerships, according to research from PwC’s Global Fintech Report. That figure hasRoughly 70% of financial institutions worldwide are now investing in fintech partnerships, according to research from PwC’s Global Fintech Report. That figure has

How 70% of Financial Institutions Are Investing in Fintech Partnerships

2026/03/24 10:47
6 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Roughly 70% of financial institutions worldwide are now investing in fintech partnerships, according to research from PwC’s Global Fintech Report. That figure has risen steadily over the past five years. In 2018, the same survey found that fewer than 45% of banks had active fintech partnerships. The shift from competition to collaboration has been one of the defining trends in financial services.

The reason is straightforward. Banks have customers, capital, and regulatory licences. Fintech companies have modern technology, faster development cycles, and better user interfaces. Combining the two produces results that neither can achieve alone.

How 70% of Financial Institutions Are Investing in Fintech Partnerships

Why Banks Started Partnering With Fintechs

For most of the 2010s, the dominant narrative in financial services was disruption. Fintech startups were going to replace banks. Neobanks would steal deposits. Peer-to-peer lenders would take over consumer lending. Payment apps would make card networks obsolete.

That narrative turned out to be mostly wrong. Banks did not disappear. They had advantages that fintech companies could not easily replicate. Regulatory licences take years to obtain. Deposit insurance is expensive and requires government approval. Large corporate clients and high-net-worth individuals prefer the stability of established institutions. According to McKinsey’s Global Banking Annual Review, traditional banks still hold more than 90% of global deposits.

What banks lacked was speed. A typical bank’s core technology infrastructure was built in the 1980s or 1990s, often running on COBOL mainframes. Updating these systems is expensive and risky. A major core banking migration can take three to five years and cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Many banks decided it was faster and cheaper to partner with fintech companies than to build modern capabilities internally.

How These Partnerships Work in Practice

Fintech-bank partnerships take several forms, and the structures have become more sophisticated over time.

The most common model is the technology vendor relationship. A bank licenses technology from a fintech company to improve a specific capability. For example, many banks use Plaid’s APIs to verify customer bank accounts and connect to external financial data. Others use Featurespace or Feedzai for real-time fraud detection powered by machine learning. The bank retains the customer relationship and the fintech provides the underlying technology.

Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) is a more integrated model. In this arrangement, a bank provides its banking licence and regulatory infrastructure while a fintech company builds the customer-facing product. Green Dot, Cross River Bank, and Sutton Bank in the US have all served as the banking partners behind fintech products like Chime, Stripe Treasury, and Cash App. The fintech handles the user experience, marketing, and customer acquisition. The bank handles compliance, holds the deposits, and earns a share of the revenue.

Some partnerships go further into joint ventures or strategic investments. Goldman Sachs built its Marcus consumer banking platform partly through partnerships with Apple (for the Apple Card) and Amazon (for small business lending). JPMorgan Chase has made multiple fintech acquisitions, including 55ip (investment technology) and Renovite Technologies (payment processing). These are not arm’s-length vendor relationships. They are strategic bets on fintech capabilities becoming core to the bank’s operations.

What the Data Shows About Partnership Outcomes

Banks that invest in fintech partnerships report measurable improvements across several metrics.

Customer acquisition costs tend to fall. According to a 2024 survey by Accenture, banks with active fintech partnerships reduced their average customer acquisition cost by 20% to 35% compared to banks relying solely on traditional channels. Digital onboarding processes, often built by fintech partners, allow customers to open accounts in minutes rather than days.

Loan processing times improve. Traditional mortgage origination in the US takes an average of 45 days, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Banks using fintech platforms for automated underwriting and document processing have cut that to 15 to 20 days. AI-powered financial tools are handling an increasing share of credit decisions, reducing both processing time and default rates.

Fraud detection rates improve as well. Machine learning models built by fintech partners can process thousands of transaction signals in real time, flagging suspicious activity faster and more accurately than rules-based systems. Several major banks reported 30% to 50% reductions in fraud losses after implementing fintech-built detection systems, according to data from the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.

The Risks and Tensions

Fintech-bank partnerships are not without problems. Regulatory scrutiny of these arrangements has increased, particularly around BaaS models. In 2023 and 2024, US banking regulators issued enforcement actions against several banks for failing to properly oversee their fintech partners. Evolve Bank & Trust and Blue Ridge Bank both faced regulatory orders related to their fintech partnership programmes.

The concern from regulators is that some banks are outsourcing too much responsibility to fintech partners without maintaining adequate oversight of compliance, anti-money laundering controls, and consumer protection. This has led to a tightening of expectations around how banks manage third-party relationships.

Data sharing is another area of tension. Banks are cautious about sharing customer data with fintech partners, partly due to regulatory requirements and partly due to competitive concerns. Open banking regulations in Europe and the UK have forced banks to share data with authorised third parties, but the implementation has been uneven. Some banks comply with the letter of the regulation while making the data-sharing process as slow and difficult as possible.

Where This Is Heading

The 70% figure is likely to keep rising. Embedded finance, which requires banks to provide financial products through non-bank platforms, depends entirely on these partnerships. As more retailers, platforms, and software companies want to offer financial services to their users, they need a bank partner to provide the regulated infrastructure.

The nature of the partnerships is also evolving. Early fintech-bank relationships were often transactional. A bank would licence a piece of technology, use it for a specific function, and that was the extent of the relationship. Newer partnerships tend to be deeper and more strategic. Banks are taking equity stakes in fintech companies, co-developing products, and integrating fintech capabilities into their core operations rather than treating them as add-ons.

For fintech companies, bank partnerships are often the fastest path to scale. Building a fully licensed, regulated financial institution from scratch takes years and costs millions. Partnering with an existing bank gives a fintech company access to the regulatory infrastructure, deposit base, and institutional credibility it would otherwise need to build on its own. The companies that manage these partnerships well, balancing innovation speed with regulatory compliance, are the ones most likely to succeed in the next decade of financial services.

Comments
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

VanEck Targets Stablecoins & Next-Gen ICOs

VanEck Targets Stablecoins & Next-Gen ICOs

The post VanEck Targets Stablecoins & Next-Gen ICOs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Welcome to the US Crypto News Morning Briefing—your essential rundown of the most important developments in crypto for the day ahead. Grab a coffee because the firms shaping crypto’s future are not just building products, but also trying to reshape how capital flows. Crypto News of the Day: VanEck Maps Next Frontier of Crypto Venture Investing VanEck, a Wall Street player known for financial “firsts,” is pushing that legacy into Web3. The firsts include pioneering US gold funds and launching one of the earliest spot Bitcoin ETFs. Sponsored Sponsored “Financial instruments have always been a kind of tokenization. From seashells to traveler’s checks, from relational databases to today’s on-chain assets. You could even joke that VanEck’s first gold mutual funds were the original ‘tokenized gold,’” Juan C. Lopez, General Partner at VanEck Ventures, told BeInCrypto. That same instinct drives the firm’s venture bets. Lopez said VanEck goes beyond writing checks and brings the full weight of the firm. This extends from regulatory proximity to product experiments to founders building the next phase of crypto infrastructure. Asked about key investment priorities, Lopez highlighted stablecoins. “We care deeply about three questions: How do we accelerate stablecoin ubiquity? What will users want to do with them once highly distributed? And what net new assets can we construct now that we have sophisticated market infrastructure?” Lopez added. However, VanEck is not limiting itself to the hottest narrative, acknowledging that decentralized finance (DeFi) is having a renaissance. The VanEck executive also noted that success will depend on new approaches to identity and programmable compliance layered on public blockchains. Backing Legion With A New Model for ICOs Sponsored Sponsored That compliance-first angle explains VanEck Ventures’ recent co-lead of Legion’s $5 million seed round alongside Brevan Howard. Legion aims to reinvent token fundraising by making early-stage access…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:52
Top Solana Treasury Firm Forward Industries Unveils $4 Billion Capital Raise To Buy More SOL ⋆ ZyCrypto

Top Solana Treasury Firm Forward Industries Unveils $4 Billion Capital Raise To Buy More SOL ⋆ ZyCrypto

The post Top Solana Treasury Firm Forward Industries Unveils $4 Billion Capital Raise To Buy More SOL ⋆ ZyCrypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Advertisement &nbsp &nbsp Forward Industries, the largest publicly traded Solana treasury company, has filed a $4 billion at-the-market (ATM) equity offering program with the U.S. SEC  to raise more capital for additional SOL accumulation. Forward Strategies Doubles Down On Solana Strategy In a Wednesday press release, Forward Industries revealed that the 4 billion ATM equity offering program will allow the company to issue and sell common stock via Cantor Fitzgerald under a sales agreement dated Sept. 16, 2025. Forward said proceeds will go toward “general corporate purposes,” including the pursuit of its Solana balance sheet and purchases of income-generating assets. The sales of the shares are covered by an automatic shelf registration statement filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission that is already effective – meaning the shares will be tradable once they’re sold. An automatic shelf registration allows certain publicly listed companies to raise capital with flexibility swiftly.  Kyle Samani, Forward’s chairman, astutely described the ATM offering as “a flexible and efficient mechanism” to raise and deploy capital for the company’s Solana strategy and bolster its balance sheet.  Advertisement &nbsp Though the maximum amount is listed as $4 billion, the firm indicated that sales may or may not occur depending on existing market conditions. “The ATM Program enhances our ability to continue scaling that position, strengthen our balance sheet, and pursue growth initiatives in alignment with our long-term vision,” Samani said. Forward Industries kicked off its Solana treasury strategy on Sept. 8. The Wednesday S-3 form follows Forward’s $1.65 billion private investment in public equity that closed last week, led by crypto heavyweights like Galaxy Digital, Jump Crypto, and Multicoin Capital. The company started deploying that capital this week, announcing it snatched up 6.8 million SOL for approximately $1.58 billion at an average price of $232…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:42
Weaker as conflict risk eases – MUFG

Weaker as conflict risk eases – MUFG

The post Weaker as conflict risk eases – MUFG appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MUFG’s Senior Currency Analyst Lee Hardman notes the US Dollar remains under
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/24 18:23