TLDR: Hyperliquid traders proposed blacklisting Arthur Hayes’ wallets after his full HYPE sale rattled the token’s price. Hayes said the funds went toward a Ferrari deposit, one month after predicting HYPE could rally 126x in three years. The proposal suggests wallet blacklists, buyer verification, and bounty programs to track connected addresses. Hayes teased a comeback [...] The post Hyperliquid Community Files Proposal to Blacklist Arthur Hayes: Here’s Why appeared first on Blockonomi.TLDR: Hyperliquid traders proposed blacklisting Arthur Hayes’ wallets after his full HYPE sale rattled the token’s price. Hayes said the funds went toward a Ferrari deposit, one month after predicting HYPE could rally 126x in three years. The proposal suggests wallet blacklists, buyer verification, and bounty programs to track connected addresses. Hayes teased a comeback [...] The post Hyperliquid Community Files Proposal to Blacklist Arthur Hayes: Here’s Why appeared first on Blockonomi.

Hyperliquid Community Files Proposal to Blacklist Arthur Hayes: Here’s Why

2025/09/27 02:48
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

TLDR:

  • Hyperliquid traders proposed blacklisting Arthur Hayes’ wallets after his full HYPE sale rattled the token’s price.
  • Hayes said the funds went toward a Ferrari deposit, one month after predicting HYPE could rally 126x in three years.
  • The proposal suggests wallet blacklists, buyer verification, and bounty programs to track connected addresses.
  • Hayes teased a comeback with a poll asking followers if he should rejoin HYPE, splitting traders on his role.

Hyperliquid traders are taking action. A formal proposal has been filed to blacklist Arthur Hayes from buying HYPE. The move follows his full exit from the token, which he confirmed went toward a Ferrari Testarossa deposit. 

Traders say the community must protect $HYPE from disruptive price swings. The proposal has set off intense debate among holders and market watchers.

Proposal Aims to Block Hayes’ Wallets

The plan was shared by Mercury, a key community voice. It calls for blocking Hayes’ wallets across every venue where HYPE trades. It also suggests adding a buyer confirmation step where users declare they are not Hayes before purchasing.

Another part of the plan includes a bounty program to identify wallets linked to him, referred to as “Hayes alts.” Mercury wrote that HYPE must defend itself from what they call narrative hijacks and price manipulation.

The proposal quickly circulated on X, sparking conversation. Some traders said this was the only way to maintain stability. Others questioned whether banning a single trader would undermine open markets.

The discussion highlights growing tension between open participation and community-driven risk management. Hyperliquid’s governance process will now determine if the measure passes.

Hayes Sale Sparks Hyperliquid Price Debate

Hayes sold his entire HYPE stash on September 21. He said the sale funded his Ferrari deposit, adding a casual remark about the new car. His exit came roughly one month after he predicted the token could gain 126x in the coming years.

That call had brought new speculators into HYPE. The abrupt sale led to accusations of timing the market against followers. Traders joked about the “Hayes Indicator,” a term for price reversals following his trades.

The sale was followed by noticeable volatility. Price action turned choppy, with wicks forming around key levels Hayes was rumored to have entered. Some holders believe his presence fuels instability.

Hayes added more drama with a poll on X asking if he should “get back on the HYPE train.” 

The post left the community split. Some welcomed a possible return, while most rallied harder for the blacklist proposal to go through.

The post Hyperliquid Community Files Proposal to Blacklist Arthur Hayes: Here’s Why appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

The post ‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Eric Trump, the son of U.S. President
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/05 18:19
Pi Network (PI) climbs on Pi Day update, token unlocks risk

Pi Network (PI) climbs on Pi Day update, token unlocks risk

Pi Network (PI) rally as Bitcoin meets $74,000 resistance Pi Network’s PI outperformed the broader crypto market, notching a multi-week high while Bitcoin stalled
Share
CoinLive2026/03/05 18:39