The post India Considers Mandatory Satellite Tracking on Smartphones as Apple and Google Push Back appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. India’s telecom industry has proposed mandatory satellite location tracking on all smartphones using A-GPS technology, which cannot be disabled by users, to enhance precise surveillance capabilities for government agencies. COAI’s Proposal: Representing major carriers like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel, the Cellular Operators Association of India seeks A-GPS integration for location accuracy within one meter. Current Limitations: Cellular tower data only provides rough estimates, hindering effective investigations. Tech Rejections: Apple, Google, and Samsung oppose the measure, citing privacy risks and lack of global precedent, with over 735 million smartphones affected in India as of mid-2025. India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones raises privacy alarms as telecom firms push for mandatory A-GPS. Discover tech giants’ opposition and surveillance implications. Stay informed on global policy shifts. What is India’s Proposal for Mandatory Satellite Location Tracking on Smartphones? India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones involves requiring all devices to enable A-GPS technology permanently, combining satellite signals and cellular data for precise user location without user opt-out options. This initiative, backed by the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), aims to improve government access to accurate location data during legal investigations. Telecom leaders like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel support it to overcome the limitations of current cellular tower-based tracking, which offers only approximate positions spanning several meters. Why Have Apple and Google Rejected India’s Telecom Industry Proposal? The proposal has met strong resistance from major smartphone manufacturers. Apple, Google, and Samsung, through their representative body the India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA), sent a confidential letter to Indian authorities in July, labeling it as unprecedented regulatory overreach. They highlighted that A-GPS is not designed or deployed for location surveillance purposes and warned of severe legal, privacy, and national security risks. For instance, the user base includes sensitive professionals such as military… The post India Considers Mandatory Satellite Tracking on Smartphones as Apple and Google Push Back appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. India’s telecom industry has proposed mandatory satellite location tracking on all smartphones using A-GPS technology, which cannot be disabled by users, to enhance precise surveillance capabilities for government agencies. COAI’s Proposal: Representing major carriers like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel, the Cellular Operators Association of India seeks A-GPS integration for location accuracy within one meter. Current Limitations: Cellular tower data only provides rough estimates, hindering effective investigations. Tech Rejections: Apple, Google, and Samsung oppose the measure, citing privacy risks and lack of global precedent, with over 735 million smartphones affected in India as of mid-2025. India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones raises privacy alarms as telecom firms push for mandatory A-GPS. Discover tech giants’ opposition and surveillance implications. Stay informed on global policy shifts. What is India’s Proposal for Mandatory Satellite Location Tracking on Smartphones? India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones involves requiring all devices to enable A-GPS technology permanently, combining satellite signals and cellular data for precise user location without user opt-out options. This initiative, backed by the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), aims to improve government access to accurate location data during legal investigations. Telecom leaders like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel support it to overcome the limitations of current cellular tower-based tracking, which offers only approximate positions spanning several meters. Why Have Apple and Google Rejected India’s Telecom Industry Proposal? The proposal has met strong resistance from major smartphone manufacturers. Apple, Google, and Samsung, through their representative body the India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA), sent a confidential letter to Indian authorities in July, labeling it as unprecedented regulatory overreach. They highlighted that A-GPS is not designed or deployed for location surveillance purposes and warned of severe legal, privacy, and national security risks. For instance, the user base includes sensitive professionals such as military…

India Considers Mandatory Satellite Tracking on Smartphones as Apple and Google Push Back

2025/12/06 23:02
  • COAI’s Proposal: Representing major carriers like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel, the Cellular Operators Association of India seeks A-GPS integration for location accuracy within one meter.

  • Current Limitations: Cellular tower data only provides rough estimates, hindering effective investigations.

  • Tech Rejections: Apple, Google, and Samsung oppose the measure, citing privacy risks and lack of global precedent, with over 735 million smartphones affected in India as of mid-2025.

India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones raises privacy alarms as telecom firms push for mandatory A-GPS. Discover tech giants’ opposition and surveillance implications. Stay informed on global policy shifts.

What is India’s Proposal for Mandatory Satellite Location Tracking on Smartphones?

India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones involves requiring all devices to enable A-GPS technology permanently, combining satellite signals and cellular data for precise user location without user opt-out options. This initiative, backed by the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), aims to improve government access to accurate location data during legal investigations. Telecom leaders like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel support it to overcome the limitations of current cellular tower-based tracking, which offers only approximate positions spanning several meters.

Why Have Apple and Google Rejected India’s Telecom Industry Proposal?

The proposal has met strong resistance from major smartphone manufacturers. Apple, Google, and Samsung, through their representative body the India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA), sent a confidential letter to Indian authorities in July, labeling it as unprecedented regulatory overreach. They highlighted that A-GPS is not designed or deployed for location surveillance purposes and warned of severe legal, privacy, and national security risks. For instance, the user base includes sensitive professionals such as military personnel, judges, and journalists, whose security could be compromised by constant tracking. Digital forensics expert Junade Ali from Britain’s Institution of Engineering and Technology described the measure as turning phones into dedicated surveillance devices. Similarly, security researcher Cooper Quintin from the Electronic Frontier Foundation called it horrifying, noting no similar global proposals exist. This opposition echoes a prior incident where the government retracted a mandate for pre-installed state-run cyber safety apps due to privacy concerns raised by activists and tech firms.

India’s telecom sector, driven by the need for better investigative tools, argues that existing systems fall short. Government agencies under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration have long expressed frustration over imprecise location data from cellular towers. Moreover, smartphone notifications alerting users to carrier location requests undermine operations by tipping off potential targets. The COAI urges disabling these alerts entirely to maintain surveillance integrity. In response, ICEA defended the notifications as essential for user transparency and control. A scheduled meeting between the home ministry and industry executives was postponed, leaving the policy’s fate undecided by the IT and home ministries.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are the Potential Privacy Implications of India’s Satellite Location Tracking Proposal?

Implementing mandatory A-GPS tracking without user disable options could enable constant government surveillance, raising significant privacy concerns. Experts warn it might expose sensitive user data, affecting millions in India’s 735 million smartphone market, where Android dominates over 95%. This could set a precedent for expanded monitoring worldwide, conflicting with global privacy standards.

How Does A-GPS Technology Work in the Context of India’s Telecom Proposal?

A-GPS enhances location accuracy by integrating satellite signals with cellular network data, achieving precision up to one meter, far superior to traditional tower triangulation. In India’s proposal, it would operate continuously on smartphones, providing authorities with real-time, detailed user positions during investigations, without relying solely on less accurate cellular estimates.

Key Takeaways

  • Permanent Tracking Mandate: The COAI proposal demands A-GPS activation on all smartphones, eliminating user control to aid precise law enforcement tracking.
  • Industry Backlash: Tech giants like Apple and Google argue it poses unprecedented privacy threats, impacting high-security users and lacking international support.
  • Market Impact: With 735 million devices in India by mid-2025, approval could influence global surveillance policies, urging stakeholders to monitor ministry decisions closely.

Conclusion

India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones underscores the tension between enhanced surveillance needs and user privacy rights, with telecom firms pushing for A-GPS integration amid opposition from Apple, Google, and Samsung. As the world’s second-largest mobile market grapples with these issues, the outcome could reshape digital security norms globally. Policymakers and users alike should stay vigilant for updates from the home and IT ministries to understand evolving implications for personal data protection.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/india-considers-mandatory-satellite-tracking-on-smartphones-as-apple-and-google-push-back

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

When Your Mom Can Use DePIN, Mass Adoption Has Arrived

When Your Mom Can Use DePIN, Mass Adoption Has Arrived

The post When Your Mom Can Use DePIN, Mass Adoption Has Arrived appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a perfect world, the internet works like tap water: you turn it on, and it flows. Seamlessly. Nobody really wants to think about a ‘better connection spot,’ SIM cards, or the nearest cell towers. Users just want a fast, stable connection wherever they are. The good thing is they’re quietly getting it without even knowing it. The internet we have is broken (and expensive) Traditional telecom infrastructure is heavy and expensive. Every tower requires a site lease, permits, maintenance, and marketing. Every expansion takes months or years (of both construction and red tape) and can cost from $5 million to $100 million, which means installing even one small cell tower can drain a business’s finances by up to $300,000. In this system, we’re not really paying for the gigabytes we use — we’re paying for the bureaucracy built around them. This system doesn’t make economic sense anymore. Telecom companies can no longer afford to spend billions on connections that don’t improve and become harder and harder to maintain with more users all over the globe. The good news is that a better alternative is already in people’s homes and devices, even though you don’t see it on billboards. DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) is turning the Wi-Fi routers around you into a new kind of connectivity. From towers to routers According to crypto asset manager Grayscale, DePIN is already widely used in day-to-day life, and the company calls it a “significant” investment opportunity. Why? DePIN takes a software-first approach, meaning it uses what already exists. A lightweight app or firmware update turns a regular Wi-Fi router into a small piece of a bigger network. When you’re nearby, your device automatically connects through that router. With DePIN’s rising popularity, people and businesses are already implementing it: Nodle, a smartphone-based DePIN,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 00:07
Two Casascius coins with $2,000 Bitcoin move after 13 years of dormancy

Two Casascius coins with $2,000 Bitcoin move after 13 years of dormancy

The post Two Casascius coins with $2,000 Bitcoin move after 13 years of dormancy appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Two Casascius physical Bitcoin coins containing about $2,000 moved after 13 years of dormancy. Casascius coins are rare, physical coins embedding private keys beneath a tamper-evident hologram. Two Casascius physical Bitcoin coins containing approximately $2,000 worth of Bitcoin moved this week after remaining dormant for 13 years, according to Timechain Index founder Sani. Casascius, which creates physical Bitcoins that embed real crypto value through a private key concealed beneath a tamper-evident hologram, allows holders to redeem the associated Bitcoin on the blockchain. The coins include a private key hidden under the hologram, intended to secure the Bitcoin until the owner chooses to access it. These physical Bitcoin coins are considered rare collectibles due to their early issuance, making any movement of such coins a rare occurrence for crypto observers. The coins were among the earliest physical representations of Bitcoin, creating historical artifacts that bridge the digital currency’s early days with its current market presence. Casascius coins and similar physical Bitcoin representations sometimes become active after extended periods of inactivity, typically generating attention within the crypto community when holders decide to access their dormant holdings. Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/casascius-coins-move-dormant-bitcoin-activity-2025/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 00:23
Music body ICMP laments “wilful” theft of artists’ work

Music body ICMP laments “wilful” theft of artists’ work

The post Music body ICMP laments “wilful” theft of artists’ work appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A major music industry group, ICMP, has lamented the use of artists’ work by AI companies, calling them guilty of “wilful” copyright infringement, as the battle between the tech firms and the arts industry continues. The Brussels-based group known as the International Confederation of Music Publishers (ICMP) comprises major record labels and other music industry professionals. Their voice adds to many others within the arts industry that have expressed displeasure at AI firms for using their creative work to train their systems without permission. ICMP accuses AI firms of deliberate copyright infringement ICMP director general John Phelan told AFP that big tech firms and AI-specific companies were involved in what he termed “the largest copyright infringement exercise that has been seen.” He cited the likes of OpenAI, Suno, Udio, and Mistral as some of the culprits. The ICMP carried out an investigation for nearly two years to ascertain how generative AI firms were using material by creatives to enrich themselves. The Brussels-based group is one of a number of industry bodies that span across news media and publishing to target the fast-growing AI sector over its use of content without paying any royalties. Suno and Udio, who are AI music generators, can produce tracks with voices, melodies, and musical styles that echo those of the original artists such as the Beatles, Depeche Mode, Mariah Carey, and the Beach boys. “What is legal or illegal is how the technologies are used. That means the corporate decisions made by the chief executives of companies matter immensely and should comply with the law,” Phelan told AFP. “What we see is they are engaged in wilful, commercial-scale copyright infringement.” Phelan. In June last year, a US trade group, the Recording Industry Association of America, filed a lawsuit against Suno and Udio. However, an exception…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:41