BENSALEM, Pa.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Law Offices of Howard G. Smith reminds investors of the upcoming February 20, 2026 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in theBENSALEM, Pa.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Law Offices of Howard G. Smith reminds investors of the upcoming February 20, 2026 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the

Deadline Approaching: Klarna Group plc (KLAR) Shareholders Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith

BENSALEM, Pa.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Law Offices of Howard G. Smith reminds investors of the upcoming February 20, 2026 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the case filed on behalf of investors who purchased Klarna Group plc (“Klarna” or the “Company”) (NYSE: KLAR) securities pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus issued in connection with the Company’s September 2025 initial public offering (the “IPO”).

IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN KLARNA GROUP PLC (KLAR), CONTACT THE LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ONGOING SECURITIES FRAUD LAWSUIT.

Contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith to discuss your legal rights by email at howardsmith@howardsmithlaw.com, by telephone at (215) 638-4847 or visit our website at www.howardsmithlaw.com.

What Happened?

On September 10, 2025, Klarna conducted its IPO, selling 34.3 million shares at $40 per share.

Then, on November 18, 2025, Klarna released its third quarter 2025 financial results, revealing that its provision for credit losses spiked by 39% due to “changes in . . . market and product mix,” and, “in particular an increased share of the U.S. market in [its] GMV [Gross Merchandise Volume].”

On this news, Klarna’s stock price fell $3.25, or 9.3%, to close at $31.63 per share on November 18, 2025, thereby injuring investors.

What Is The Lawsuit About?

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) Defendants materially understated the risk that its loss reserves would materially go up within a few months of the IPO, which they either knew of or should have known of given the risk profile of many individuals agreeing to Klarna’s buy now, pay later (BNPL) loans; and (2) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

If you purchased or otherwise acquired Klarna securities pursuant and/or traceable to the IPO, you may move the Court no later than February 20, 2026 to ask the Court to appoint you as lead plaintiff if you meet certain legal requirements.

Contact Us To Participate or Learn More:

If you wish to learn more about this class action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us:

Law Offices of Howard G. Smith,

3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112,

Bensalem, Pennsylvania 19020,

Telephone: (215) 638-4847

Email: howardsmith@howardsmithlaw.com,

Visit our website at: www.howardsmithlaw.com.

To be a member of the class action you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contacts

Contact Us:
Law Offices of Howard G. Smith

Howard G. Smith, Esquire

215-638-4847

howardsmith@howardsmithlaw.com
www.howardsmithlaw.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Data Breach Fallout: Former Employee Arrest in India Over Customer Data Case Raises Bitcoin Security Concerns

Coinbase Data Breach Fallout: Former Employee Arrest in India Over Customer Data Case Raises Bitcoin Security Concerns

The post Coinbase Data Breach Fallout: Former Employee Arrest in India Over Customer Data Case Raises Bitcoin Security Concerns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/27 10:36
Burmese war amputees get free 3D-printed prostheses, thanks to Thailand-based group

Burmese war amputees get free 3D-printed prostheses, thanks to Thailand-based group

PROSTHETIC FEET. Silicon foot covers fitted with metal rods found in the prosthetic production unit in Mae Tao Clinic. A good prosthetic foot must absorb impact
Share
Rappler2025/12/27 10:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37