Citrea, a Bitcoin-native ZK-rollup backed by Founders Fund and Galaxy Ventures, launched its mainnet on Tuesday, delivering BTC-collateral lending, BTC-structuredCitrea, a Bitcoin-native ZK-rollup backed by Founders Fund and Galaxy Ventures, launched its mainnet on Tuesday, delivering BTC-collateral lending, BTC-structured

Citrea Bitcoin Rollup Debuts Mainnet With ctUSD Stablecoin

9 min read
Citrea Bitcoin Rollup Debuts Mainnet With Ctusd Stablecoin

Citrea, a Bitcoin-native ZK-rollup backed by Founders Fund and Galaxy Ventures, launched its mainnet on Tuesday, delivering BTC-collateral lending, BTC-structured products, and a new dollar-backed stablecoin, ctUSD. The project, developed by Chainway Labs, positions itself as an on-chain engine that converts idle BTC into core DeFi liquidity and enables closer settlement to Bitcoin’s base layer. In its early days, Citrea projects DeFi activity to reach about $50 million in liquidity as BTC lending, BTC-structured products, and decentralized trading go live from day one, with ctUSD anchoring that activity in a compliant, on-chain fashion.

The launch thrust Citrea into a familiar debate about the allocation of scarce Bitcoin block space: should it be reserved for payments or harnessed to power a broader financial stack? With block rewards trending lower over time, many developers argue that non-payment use cases are essential to sustaining miner revenue. Critics, however, warn that complex DeFi infrastructure built on top of Bitcoin may introduce new risk layers to a network historically prized for censorship resistance and simplicity.

Key takeaways

  • Citrea’s mainnet introduces BTC-collateral lending and BTC-structured products on a native rollup, with ctUSD serving as the primary dollar-pegged stablecoin (CRYPTO: CTUSD).
  • ctUSD is issued 1:1 with cash and short-term US Treasuries backing and leverages MoonPay’s banking rails, embedding fiat on- and off-ramps directly into the Layer 2 settlement layer.
  • The stablecoin is designed to be the single, preferred liquidity anchor for Citrea, aiming to avoid liquidity fragmentation that typically arises from bridged asset variants.
  • On the testnet, data-availability usage reached almost 10% of Bitcoin’s monthly bandwidth at one point, signaling meaningful early activity even before full mainnet adoption.
  • The launch rekindles the broader industry discussion about the balance between Bitcoin’s block space constraints and the growth of on-chain DeFi ecosystems built atop Bitcoin’s security guarantees.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $USDT, $USDC, $CTUSD

Sentiment: Neutral

Market context: The move sits at the intersection of Bitcoin’s evolving role as a settlement layer and the broader DeFi push into alternative layer-2 constructions, aligning with ongoing industry experimentation around scalable, regulated fiat-backed tokens on Bitcoin-adjacent systems.

Why it matters

Citrea’s mainnet marks a noteworthy attempt to redeploy Bitcoin’s scarce block space toward productive financial uses. By tying a Bitcoin-anchored rollup to a regulated, cash-backed stablecoin, the project aims to reduce the liquidity fragmentation that often accompanies cross-chain solutions. ctUSD is issued directly on the Citrea rollup rather than bridged from another chain, which Citrea’s leadership argues reduces exposure to common cross-chain risks and collateral vulnerabilities that can accompany wrapped assets.

Orkun Mahir Kılıç, the co-founder and CEO of Chainway Labs—the team behind Citrea—describes ctUSD as native to the rollup and integrated with MoonPay’s banking rails, including virtual IBANs that enable fiat to be wired in and settled on-chain automatically. This approach is intended to streamline onboarding for users and institutions that require regulated rails for fiat-to-crypto movements, potentially lowering friction for Bitcoin-denominated DeFi interactions. In practical terms, ctUSD’s 1:1 backing in cash and short-dated Treasuries is positioned as a safer alternative to stamped-wrapped tokens that often rely on third-party solvency guarantees.

The design emphasizes security and consolidation. ctUSD’s native issuance on the Citrea chain means the stablecoin inherits the security properties of the Citrea network itself, rather than relying on external bridges that have historically been a hotspot for exploits. Advocates argue this reduces the external risk profile typically associated with cross-chain liquidity but acknowledge that the trade-off is a more centralized sequencing and treasury structure—the so-called “single sequencer” and a private, on-chain treasury with multi-party governance. Critics counter that such trust assumptions could shift systemic risk from on-chain code to off-chain operational controls, raising questions about decentralization and resilience.

On the broader front, the project is framed as an experiment about demand for Bitcoin block space. Bitcoin core developers and industry observers have noted that future miner revenue may increasingly depend on non-payment use cases. The debate is far from settled: if Citrea and similar ventures can demonstrate sustained, productive demand for block space—without undermining Bitcoin’s core reliability—the model could influence how the network balances throughput, fees, and security in a mature DeFi era. A notable point of discussion is whether complex DeFi activity truly complements Bitcoin’s mission or if it creates an overbuilt infrastructure that competes with Bitcoin’s primary function as a trustworthy payments network.

In the broader crypto ecosystem, the move echoes a wave of experimentation where other teams have pursued Bitcoin-focused DeFi applications, including collaborations and cross-ecosystem initiatives. For instance, partnerships that bring Bitcoin DeFi tools to institutions in Japan have highlighted the appetite for regulated, Bitcoin-linked financial services, underscoring a market that is increasingly receptive to institutional-grade rails and compliant stablecoins built around BTC.

Citrea’s early data on testnet activity underscores a meaningful appetite for on-chain Bitcoin usage. In its test phase, Citrea reported that data-availability usage accounted for a notable share of Bitcoin’s bandwidth, suggesting that even pre-launch activity can exert real pressure on block space. If the mainnet proves scalable and capable of sustaining $50 million in DeFi liquidity over the coming weeks, it could set a precedent for how Bitcoin-based Rollups approach liquidity, borrowing, and collateral across the ecosystem.

What to watch next

  • Monitoring ctUSD adoption: tracking on-chain utilization, liquidity depth, and user uptake as ctUSD becomes the standard base liquidity token on Citrea.
  • Regulatory and banking integration steps: assessing how MoonPay’s rails and vIBAN-based payments evolve to support broader institutional participation.
  • Security and governance developments: evaluating the trust model around the single sequencer, off-chain treasury, and multi-party federation, and how that affects security guarantees.
  • Liquidity growth metrics: watching the rate at which BTC-denominated DeFi products and collateralized lending scale beyond the initial $50 million target.
  • Industry comparison: observing how Citrea’s approach stacks up against other Bitcoin DeFi initiatives and cross-chain bridges in terms of risk, capital efficiency, and user experience.

Sources & verification

  • Citrea mainnet launch announcement and details on the Pr Newswire release documenting BTC collateral lending, BTC-structured products, and ctUSD.
  • Statements from Orkun Mahir Kılıç, co-founder and CEO of Chainway Labs, regarding ctUSD being natively issued on the Citrea rollup and wired into MoonPay’s infrastructure (vIBANs).
  • Testnet data showing significant data availability usage, illustrating early demand on Bitcoin block space.
  • Industry commentary on Bitcoin block space and DeFi use cases, including perspectives from Bitcoin core developers and prominent community members.
  • Related industry coverage, including Animoca, RootstockLabs collaboration on Bitcoin DeFi and broader market analyses.

Citrea’s Bitcoin-native DeFi experiment lands on mainnet

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) stands at the center of Citrea’s ambitious push to reimagine how its network’s scarce resources can power a DeFi stack. The project’s mainnet launch introduces a native BTC-collateral lending framework, BTC‑structured products, and ctUSD (CRYPTO: CTUSD), a stablecoin issued directly on the rollup rather than bridged from another chain. ctUSD is designed to be the core liquidity layer for the Bitcoin economy, backed 1:1 by cash and short‑term US Treasuries, and wired into fiat rails via MoonPay’s infrastructure. The arrangement promises to simplify on‑ramp and settlement flows while anchoring DeFi activity to Bitcoin’s security model.

From the outset, ctUSD is positioned as a compliant counterweight to wrapped versions of other dollars, with the intent of avoiding liquidity fragmentation that can arise when similar assets exist across multiple bridges. The stablecoin’s native issuance aims to minimize cross‑chain risk by keeping collateral and settlement within Citrea’s consolidated ecosystem. In practical terms, ctUSD’s 1:1 backing by cash and Treasuries provides a straightforward, auditable reserve model, and the on‑ramp through traditional rails may appeal to institutions seeking regulated exposure to Bitcoin‑denominated liquidity.

Critical to the project’s architecture is a belief that Bitcoin should not be confined to a single function. Citrea emphasizes that its rollup inherits the security properties of Bitcoin’s base layer, avoiding the common transfer of risk seen in bridging scenarios. Critics caution that the model retains considerable off‑chain trust assumptions, including the role of a single sequencer and a multi‑party federation, which could introduce governance and operational risks even as they simplify certain on‑chain mechanics. The debate over “on‑chain DeFi on Bitcoin” continues, but Citrea’s mainnet provides a concrete, observable milestone that tests whether a Bitcoin‑anchored DeFi layer can deliver sustainable liquidity and reliable settlement.

Early activity on the testnet offered a glimpse into the demand for Bitcoin block space in DeFi contexts. Citrea reported that data availability usage early in the cycle amounted to a meaningful share of Bitcoin’s monthly bandwidth, a signal that even pre‑launch engines can drive real congestion and fee pressure if scaling proves feasible. As the project moves from testnet signals to full mainnet liquidity, observers will be watching how quickly lending, trading, and structured products develop the kind of organic usage that supports miners’ fee revenues without compromising network resilience.

In the broader crypto landscape, Citrea’s approach intersects with a growing appetite for regulated, Bitcoin‑backed financial infrastructure. Proponents argue that a well‑designed, Bitcoin‑anchored DeFi layer could unlock new forms of liquidity for BTC holders, reduce the reliance on non-Bitcoin bridges, and create a more cohesive Bitcoin economy. Skeptics, meanwhile, worry about overloading Bitcoin’s capacity and introduce concerns about centralized trust models. The truth likely lies somewhere in between: if Citrea demonstrates sustained liquidity growth, robust security guarantees, and clear risk controls, it could influence how market participants conceptualize the use of Bitcoin block space for financial dApps rather than payments alone.

The broader narrative continues to unfold as other projects explore Bitcoin DeFi and institutions weigh regulated access to Bitcoin‑denominated liquidity. While opinion remains divided, Citrea’s mainnet provides a real‑world test case for mounting Bitcoin‑centric DeFi activity on a native rollup that’s tightly linked to regulated fiat rails. If ctUSD proves scalable and reliable—and if liquidity grows toward the $50 million target in coming weeks—the model could catalyze further experimentation aimed at harmonizing Bitcoin’s security with a broader, on‑chain financial ecosystem.

This article was originally published as Citrea Bitcoin Rollup Debuts Mainnet With ctUSD Stablecoin on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15