TLDR Sen. Thom Tillis opposes Kevin Warsh’s nomination for Federal Reserve chair until the DOJ probe into Powell is resolved. The DOJ investigation into Powell TLDR Sen. Thom Tillis opposes Kevin Warsh’s nomination for Federal Reserve chair until the DOJ probe into Powell is resolved. The DOJ investigation into Powell

Sen. Tillis Opposes Kevin Warsh’s Nomination for Fed Chair Over DOJ Investigation Into Powell

TLDR

  • Sen. Thom Tillis opposes Kevin Warsh’s nomination for Federal Reserve chair until the DOJ probe into Powell is resolved.
  • The DOJ investigation into Powell stems from the Fed’s headquarters renovation and his testimony before Congress.
  • Tillis’ opposition could create a stalemate in the Senate Banking Committee, delaying Warsh’s nomination process.
  • Democrats, led by Senator Elizabeth Warren, criticize Warsh’s nomination, citing concerns over Trump’s influence on the Fed.
  • Warsh, a former Fed governor, faces challenges amid the political climate and ongoing legal investigations into Powell.

Senator Thom Tillis has stated that he will oppose the nomination of Kevin Warsh as Federal Reserve chair until the criminal probe of Jerome Powell is resolved. Tillis, a member of the Senate Banking Committee, emphasized the importance of protecting the Federal Reserve from political influence. He made his position clear in a statement, stressing that the Federal Reserve’s independence is non-negotiable.

Tillis Rejects Warsh Nomination Amid Powell’s DOJ Investigation

According to a CNBC report, Senator Tillis declared that he will oppose the confirmation of Kevin Warsh for Federal Reserve chair. He cited the ongoing investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) into Chairman Jerome Powell as his reason.

The criminal investigation stems from the Federal Reserve’s renovation of its headquarters and Powell’s testimony before Congress regarding the project. Powell believes the investigation is politically motivated, as it coincides with his refusal to cut interest rates at President Trump’s request. Tillis, however, emphasized that this issue must be resolved before moving forward with any new nominations for the Federal Reserve.

Potential Stalemate in Senate Banking Committee

Tillis’s opposition could create a roadblock for Warsh’s nomination, as he is a key member of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee. This committee has 13 Republicans and 11 Democrats, meaning a single Republican vote against Warsh would likely lead to a stalemate.

Without a recommendation for approval, Warsh’s nomination would not be sent to the full Senate for a vote. Warsh, who was nominated by President Trump, is a former Federal Reserve governor with a deep understanding of monetary policy.

Despite Tillis’s opposition, Warsh’s supporters argue that his qualifications make him a suitable candidate to lead the Federal Reserve. However, the ongoing DOJ probe and the political climate surrounding the nomination could make the confirmation process more difficult.

Criticism from Democrats on Kelvin Warsh’s Nomination

Democratic lawmakers have also voiced concerns over Warsh’s potential nomination. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts criticized the move, saying that no Republican claiming to care about the Federal Reserve’s independence should support Warsh.

The growing tension around Warsh’s nomination reflects broader political divisions over the future leadership of the Federal Reserve. The ongoing investigation into Jerome Powell further complicates an already contentious nomination process. While some Republicans support Warsh’s candidacy, the political and legal challenges surrounding the nomination could delay or derail the confirmation altogether.

The post Sen. Tillis Opposes Kevin Warsh’s Nomination for Fed Chair Over DOJ Investigation Into Powell appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP Escrow Amendment Gains Momentum, Set for February 2026 Activation

XRP Escrow Amendment Gains Momentum, Set for February 2026 Activation

TLDR The XRP Ledger’s Token Escrow amendment has gained 82.35% consensus and is set for activation on February 12, 2026. This amendment allows users to escrow a
Share
Coincentral2026/01/31 01:00
ZKP’s 300x Potential Takes Center Stage as XRP Price Shifts and Algorand News Turns Cautious

ZKP’s 300x Potential Takes Center Stage as XRP Price Shifts and Algorand News Turns Cautious

ZKP takes focus as XRP price tests a macro shift and Algorand news signals caution, reshaping views on structure and the best crypto to buy.
Share
Blockchainreporter2026/01/31 01:00