The post Tech IPO hype drowned out by prospect of $1 trillion in debt sales appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Magnificent 7 tech stocks on display at the NasdaqThe post Tech IPO hype drowned out by prospect of $1 trillion in debt sales appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Magnificent 7 tech stocks on display at the Nasdaq

Tech IPO hype drowned out by prospect of $1 trillion in debt sales

Magnificent 7 tech stocks on display at the Nasdaq.

Adam Jeffery | CNBC

While the prospect of a SpaceX initial public offering and the hopeful listings from OpenAI and Anthropic have juiced IPO excitement on Wall Street, the current action in tech capital markets has nothing to do with equity. Rather, it’s all about debt.

Tech’s four hyperscalers — Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft — are collectively projected to shell out close to $700 billion this year on capital expenditures and finance leases to fuel their artificial intelligence buildouts, responding to what they call historic levels of demand for computing resources.

To finance those investments, industry giants may have to dip into some of the cash they’ve built up in recent years. But they’re also looking to raise mounds of debt, adding to concerns about an AI bubble and fears about a market contagion if cash-burning startups like OpenAI and Anthropic hit a growth wall and pull back on their infrastructure spending.

In a report late last month, UBS estimated that after tech and AI-related debt issuance across the globe more than doubled to $710 billion last year, that number could soar to $990 billion in 2026. Morgan Stanley foresees a $1.5 trillion financing gap for the AI buildout that will likely be filled in large part by credit as companies can no longer self-fund their capex.

Chris White, CEO of data and research firm BondCliQ, says the corporate debt market has experienced a “monumental” increase in size, amounting to “massive supply now in the debt markets.”

The biggest corporate debt sales this year have come from Oracle and Alphabet.

Oracle said in early February that it planned to raise $45 billion to $50 billion this year to build additional AI capacity. It quickly sold $25 billion of dollars worth of debt in the high-grade market. Alphabet followed this week, upping the size of a bond offering to over $30 billion, after holding a prior $25 billion debt sale in November.

Other companies are letting investors know that they could come knocking.

Amazon filed a mixed shelf registration last week, disclosing that it may seek to raise a combination of debt and equity. On Meta’s earnings call, CFO Susan Li said the company will look for opportunities to supplement its cash flow “with prudent amounts of cost-efficient external financing, which may lead us to eventually maintain a positive net debt balance.”

And as Tesla bolsters its infrastructure, the electric vehicle maker may look to outside funding, “whether it’s through more debt or other means,” CFO Vaibhav Taneja said following fourth-quarter earnings.

With some of the world’s most valuable companies adding to their debt loads by the tens of billions, Wall Street firms are plenty busy as they await movement on the IPO front. There haven’t been any IPO filings from notable U.S. tech companies this year, and the attention is focused on what Elon Musk will do with SpaceX after he merged the rocket maker with AI startup xAI last week, forming a company that he says is worth $1.25 trillion.

Reports have suggested SpaceX will aim to go public in mid-2026, while investor Ross Gerber, CEO of Gerber Kawasaki, told CNBC he doesn’t think Musk will take SpaceX public as a standalone entity, and will instead merge it with Tesla.

As for OpenAI and Anthropic — competing AI labs that are both valued in the hundreds of billions of dollars — reports have surfaced about eventual plans for public debuts, but no timelines have been set. Goldman Sachs analysts said in a recent note that they expect 120 IPOs this year, raising $160 billion, up from 61 deals last year.

‘Not that appetizing’

Class V Group’s Lise Buyer, who advises pre-IPO companies, isn’t seeing bustling activity within tech. The volatility in the public markets, particularly around software and its AI-related vulnerabilities, along with geopolitical concerns and soft employment numbers are some of the factors keeping venture-backed startups on the sidelines, she said.

“It’s not that appetizing out there right now,” Buyer said in an interview. “Things are better than they’ve been the last three years, but an overabundance of IPOs is unlikely to be a problem this year.”

That’s unwelcome news for venture capitalists, who have been waiting for an IPO resurgence since the market shut down in 2022 as inflation soared and interest rates rose. Certain venture firms, hedge funds and strategic investors have generated handsome profits from large acquisitions, including those disguised as acquihires and licensing deals, but startup investors historically need a healthy IPO market to keep their limited partners happy and willing to write additional checks.

There were 31 tech IPOs in the U.S. last year, more than the three years prior combined, though far below the 121 deals completed in 2021, according to data compiled by University of Florida finance professor Jay Ritter, who has long tracked the IPO market.

Greg Abbott, governor of Texas, left, and Sundar Pichai, chief executive officer of Alphabet Inc., during a media event at the Google Midlothian Data Center in Midlothian, Texas, US, on Friday, Nov. 14, 2025.

Jonathan Johnson | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Alphabet has shown that the debt market is extremely receptive to its fundraising efforts, for now at least. The bonds have varying maturity dates, with the first debt coming due in three years. Yields are narrowly higher than for the 3-year Treasury, meaning investors aren’t getting rewarded for risk.

In its U.S. bond sale, Alphabet priced its 2029 notes at a 3.7% yield and its 2031 notes at 4.1%.

John Lloyd, global head of multi-sector credit at Janus Henderson Investors, said spreads are historically tight across the investment grade landscape, which makes it a tough investment.

“We’re not worried about ratings downgrades, not worried about fundamentals of the companies,” Lloyd said. But in looking at potential for returns, Lloyd said he prefers higher-yield debt from some of the so-called neoclouds and the converted bitcoin miners that are now focused on AI.

After raising $20 billion in debt in the U.S., Alphabet immediately turned to Europe for roughly $11 billion of additional capital. A credit analyst told CNBC that Alphabet’s success overseas could convince other hyperscalers to follow, as it shows demand goes well beyond Wall Street.

Concentration risk?

With so much debt coming from a small number of companies, corporate bond indexes are faced with a similar issue as stock benchmarks: too much tech.

Roughly one-third of the S&P 500’s value now comes from tech’s trillion-dollar club, which includes Nvidia and the hyperscalers. Lloyd said tech is now about 9% of investment grade corporate debt indexes, and he sees that number reaching the mid to high teens.

Dave Harrison Smith, chief investment officer at Bailard, described that level of concentration as an “opportunity and a risk.”

“These are tremendously profitable cash flow generative businesses that have a great deal of flexibility to invest that cash flow,” said Smith, whose firm invests in equities and fixed income. “But the way we’re looking at it increasingly is the sheer amount of investment and capital that is being required is quite simply eye-popping.”

That’s not the only concern for the debt market.

White of BondCliQ says that with such a vast supply of debt hitting the market from the top tech companies, investors are going to demand stronger yields from everyone else. Increased supply leads to lower bond prices, and when bond prices fall, yields rise.

Alphabet’s sale was reportedly five times oversubscribed, but “if you supply this much paper into the marketplace, eventually demand is going to wane,” White said.

For borrowers, that means a higher cost of capital, which results in a hit to profits. The companies to look out for, White said, are those that have to come back to the market in the next couple years, when interest rates for corporate bonds are likely to be higher.

“It will cause much, much higher corporate debt financing across the board,” White said, specifying increased costs for companies like automakers and banks. “That’s a big problem down the line because it means higher debt servicing costs.”

— CNBC’s Seema Mody and Jennifer Elias contributed to this report.

WATCH: Alphabet to raise over $30 billion in bond sale

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/12/tech-ipo-hype-drowned-out-by-prospect-of-1-trillion-in-debt-sales.html

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Ultimea Unveils Skywave X100 Dual: 9.2.6 Wireless Home Theater Launching March 2026

Ultimea Unveils Skywave X100 Dual: 9.2.6 Wireless Home Theater Launching March 2026

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Calif., Feb. 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Ultimea, a leader in immersive home entertainment, announces the upcoming launch of its next-generation flagship
Share
AI Journal2026/02/13 02:45
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Ripple’s RLUSD Now Integrated on Binance XRP

Ripple’s RLUSD Now Integrated on Binance XRP

The post Ripple’s RLUSD Now Integrated on Binance XRP appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Binance completes RLUSD integration on XRP Ledger and opens
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/13 02:24