The post The Global Liquidity Boom That Bitcoin Ignored appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is trading at $104,376 as of this writing, extending losses from the weekend after hitting highs of $111,190 on Friday and $111,250 by Sunday. The pullback comes even as global liquidity surges to levels unseen since the pandemic, with the US Federal Reserve injecting $125 billion into the banking system over the past five days and China’s money supply topping $47 trillion. More money is flooding the system, yet Bitcoin isn’t responding. Sponsored Sponsored $47 Trillion in China, $125 Billion from the Fed — Yet Bitcoin Isn’t Moving Liquidity, the amount of money or credit circulating in an economy, is often seen as the tide that lifts all boats. When central banks inject cash through quantitative easing (QE), repo operations, or credit expansion, it tends to drive up asset prices from equities to crypto. But that relationship is showing cracks. “The idea that liquidity expanding necessarily causes Bitcoin to rise is quite unsophisticated and lacks nuance. All types of liquidity are not created equal. QE versus targeted policies like BTFP affect very different parts of the system. More liquidity doesn’t automatically mean a higher BTC price,” said attorney and market analyst Joe Carlasare on X. Carlasare’s point speaks to the heart of the current disconnect. The Fed’s latest injections, overnight repos totaling $125 billion, are designed to stabilize short-term funding markets, not to stimulate broad risk-taking. BREAKING 🚨: U.S. Banks FED just did it again! Another $24 Billion injection into the U.S. Banking system 🤯 Make that $125 Billion over the last 5 days 🤑 pic.twitter.com/iGJ8PjUuqb — Barchart (@Barchart) November 3, 2025 They boost systemic liquidity, not market liquidity that flows directly into risk assets such as Bitcoin. China’s $47 Trillion Shadow While US liquidity injections grab headlines, the bigger story may lie in China. BeInCrypto reported that China’s… The post The Global Liquidity Boom That Bitcoin Ignored appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is trading at $104,376 as of this writing, extending losses from the weekend after hitting highs of $111,190 on Friday and $111,250 by Sunday. The pullback comes even as global liquidity surges to levels unseen since the pandemic, with the US Federal Reserve injecting $125 billion into the banking system over the past five days and China’s money supply topping $47 trillion. More money is flooding the system, yet Bitcoin isn’t responding. Sponsored Sponsored $47 Trillion in China, $125 Billion from the Fed — Yet Bitcoin Isn’t Moving Liquidity, the amount of money or credit circulating in an economy, is often seen as the tide that lifts all boats. When central banks inject cash through quantitative easing (QE), repo operations, or credit expansion, it tends to drive up asset prices from equities to crypto. But that relationship is showing cracks. “The idea that liquidity expanding necessarily causes Bitcoin to rise is quite unsophisticated and lacks nuance. All types of liquidity are not created equal. QE versus targeted policies like BTFP affect very different parts of the system. More liquidity doesn’t automatically mean a higher BTC price,” said attorney and market analyst Joe Carlasare on X. Carlasare’s point speaks to the heart of the current disconnect. The Fed’s latest injections, overnight repos totaling $125 billion, are designed to stabilize short-term funding markets, not to stimulate broad risk-taking. BREAKING 🚨: U.S. Banks FED just did it again! Another $24 Billion injection into the U.S. Banking system 🤯 Make that $125 Billion over the last 5 days 🤑 pic.twitter.com/iGJ8PjUuqb — Barchart (@Barchart) November 3, 2025 They boost systemic liquidity, not market liquidity that flows directly into risk assets such as Bitcoin. China’s $47 Trillion Shadow While US liquidity injections grab headlines, the bigger story may lie in China. BeInCrypto reported that China’s…

The Global Liquidity Boom That Bitcoin Ignored

Bitcoin is trading at $104,376 as of this writing, extending losses from the weekend after hitting highs of $111,190 on Friday and $111,250 by Sunday.

The pullback comes even as global liquidity surges to levels unseen since the pandemic, with the US Federal Reserve injecting $125 billion into the banking system over the past five days and China’s money supply topping $47 trillion. More money is flooding the system, yet Bitcoin isn’t responding.

Sponsored

Sponsored

$47 Trillion in China, $125 Billion from the Fed — Yet Bitcoin Isn’t Moving

Liquidity, the amount of money or credit circulating in an economy, is often seen as the tide that lifts all boats. When central banks inject cash through quantitative easing (QE), repo operations, or credit expansion, it tends to drive up asset prices from equities to crypto. But that relationship is showing cracks.

Carlasare’s point speaks to the heart of the current disconnect. The Fed’s latest injections, overnight repos totaling $125 billion, are designed to stabilize short-term funding markets, not to stimulate broad risk-taking.

They boost systemic liquidity, not market liquidity that flows directly into risk assets such as Bitcoin.

China’s $47 Trillion Shadow

While US liquidity injections grab headlines, the bigger story may lie in China. BeInCrypto reported that China’s M2 money supply has reached $47.1 trillion, surpassing that of the US by more than 2x. This marks the widest liquidity gap in modern history.

Sponsored

Sponsored

China’s long-term credit expansion, which began after the 2008 financial crisis, has fueled growth through infrastructure and exports rather than speculative markets.

That helps explain why global liquidity can rise, yet crypto doesn’t necessarily follow.

The catch is that much of this liquidity remains trapped within China’s domestic system, limiting its impact on global assets, such as Bitcoin. Even where liquidity is reaching markets, Bitcoin isn’t first in line.

That rotation is visible across capital flows. AI and semiconductor stocks have absorbed much of the speculative bid that once powered Bitcoin.

Sponsored

Sponsored

BeInCrypto also reported Korean retail traders swapping crypto charts for Nvidia stock. Until those trades subside, macro liquidity may continue to bypass crypto.

System Under Strain Because Liquidity Is Energy, Not Direction

Meanwhile, the broader US system shows mounting stress. As The Kobeissi Letter reported, the government has borrowed $600 billion in just 30 days amid a prolonged shutdown, averaging $19 billion per day.

Air travel disruptions, falling labor data, and a rate-cutting Fed underline how fragile the current environment is.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Against that backdrop, Bitcoin’s sideways move may reflect caution, not apathy. Liquidity builds potential, not inevitability.

In other words, liquidity creates the capacity for price movement, but psychology determines when that movement happens.

Against these backdrops, analysts like James Thorne point to the end of quantitative tightening (QT) in December 2025 as the next major liquidity inflection.

When QT ends, the Fed is expected to reinvest $60–70 billion per month in Treasuries, a sustained flow that could finally drive Bitcoin’s price higher. Until then, markets remain in a holding pattern.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/bitcoin-liquidity-disconnect-2025/

Market Opportunity
Boom Logo
Boom Price(BOOM)
$0.004766
$0.004766$0.004766
-0.56%
USD
Boom (BOOM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

Exploring how the costs of a pandemic can lead to a self-enforcing lockdown in a networked economy, analyzing the resulting changes in network structure and the existence of stable equilibria.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:00