The post Uniswap CEO Accuses Citadel’s Griffin of Lobbying SEC Against DeFi appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Uniswap’s CEO accuses Citadel’s Ken Griffin of lobbying. Regulates DeFi as centralized entities. Prompted widespread reaction within DeFi community. On December 4th, 2025, Uniswap’s founder Hayden Adams accused Citadel Securities CEO Ken Griffin of lobbying the U.S. SEC to regulate DeFi protocol developers as centralized intermediaries. This accusation highlights ongoing tensions in the financial world, with potential regulatory impacts on decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems and implications for innovation and market fairness. Uniswap CEO’s Allegations and Industry Repercussions On December 4th, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams made waves by accusing Citadel Securities CEO Ken Griffin of lobbying behind the scenes for U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulatory mandates targeting DeFi protocol developers. Adams characterized this purported lobbying as a continuation of Griffin’s prior interference with Constitution DAO. He expressed concerns that defining DeFi developers as centralized intermediaries undermines the foundational decentralized ethos of these protocols. If enforced, these regulatory changes might reshape the DeFi landscape, imposing increased compliance constraints on protocol developers. Capital inflows into DeFi could potentially be challenged, heightening industry’s hesitation due to anticipated regulatory costs and perceived risks. Ken Griffin’s accusation that DeFi can’t achieve fair access is absurd and shows the traditional market makers’ rejection of open-source decentralized liquidity. — Hayden Adams, Founder of Uniswap Across the cryptocurrency sector, varied reactions have emerged. The Ethereum and DeFi developer communities voiced strong opposition to any regulation mislabeling protocol developers, potentially stifling innovation. Adams himself highlighted the absurdity of Griffin’s accusations, sparking animated discussions across social media platforms regarding DeFi’s open-source advancements versus traditional financial models. Ethereum Market Trends and Regulatory Analysis Did you know? The controversy between Citadel and DeFi reflects a similar dynamic seen during the Constitution DAO incident, illustrating the recurring struggle for dominance and recognition between decentralized platforms and centralized financial interests. As… The post Uniswap CEO Accuses Citadel’s Griffin of Lobbying SEC Against DeFi appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Uniswap’s CEO accuses Citadel’s Ken Griffin of lobbying. Regulates DeFi as centralized entities. Prompted widespread reaction within DeFi community. On December 4th, 2025, Uniswap’s founder Hayden Adams accused Citadel Securities CEO Ken Griffin of lobbying the U.S. SEC to regulate DeFi protocol developers as centralized intermediaries. This accusation highlights ongoing tensions in the financial world, with potential regulatory impacts on decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems and implications for innovation and market fairness. Uniswap CEO’s Allegations and Industry Repercussions On December 4th, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams made waves by accusing Citadel Securities CEO Ken Griffin of lobbying behind the scenes for U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulatory mandates targeting DeFi protocol developers. Adams characterized this purported lobbying as a continuation of Griffin’s prior interference with Constitution DAO. He expressed concerns that defining DeFi developers as centralized intermediaries undermines the foundational decentralized ethos of these protocols. If enforced, these regulatory changes might reshape the DeFi landscape, imposing increased compliance constraints on protocol developers. Capital inflows into DeFi could potentially be challenged, heightening industry’s hesitation due to anticipated regulatory costs and perceived risks. Ken Griffin’s accusation that DeFi can’t achieve fair access is absurd and shows the traditional market makers’ rejection of open-source decentralized liquidity. — Hayden Adams, Founder of Uniswap Across the cryptocurrency sector, varied reactions have emerged. The Ethereum and DeFi developer communities voiced strong opposition to any regulation mislabeling protocol developers, potentially stifling innovation. Adams himself highlighted the absurdity of Griffin’s accusations, sparking animated discussions across social media platforms regarding DeFi’s open-source advancements versus traditional financial models. Ethereum Market Trends and Regulatory Analysis Did you know? The controversy between Citadel and DeFi reflects a similar dynamic seen during the Constitution DAO incident, illustrating the recurring struggle for dominance and recognition between decentralized platforms and centralized financial interests. As…

Uniswap CEO Accuses Citadel’s Griffin of Lobbying SEC Against DeFi

2025/12/04 12:16
Key Points:
  • Uniswap’s CEO accuses Citadel’s Ken Griffin of lobbying.
  • Regulates DeFi as centralized entities.
  • Prompted widespread reaction within DeFi community.

On December 4th, 2025, Uniswap’s founder Hayden Adams accused Citadel Securities CEO Ken Griffin of lobbying the U.S. SEC to regulate DeFi protocol developers as centralized intermediaries.

This accusation highlights ongoing tensions in the financial world, with potential regulatory impacts on decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems and implications for innovation and market fairness.

Uniswap CEO’s Allegations and Industry Repercussions

On December 4th, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams made waves by accusing Citadel Securities CEO Ken Griffin of lobbying behind the scenes for U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulatory mandates targeting DeFi protocol developers. Adams characterized this purported lobbying as a continuation of Griffin’s prior interference with Constitution DAO. He expressed concerns that defining DeFi developers as centralized intermediaries undermines the foundational decentralized ethos of these protocols.

If enforced, these regulatory changes might reshape the DeFi landscape, imposing increased compliance constraints on protocol developers. Capital inflows into DeFi could potentially be challenged, heightening industry’s hesitation due to anticipated regulatory costs and perceived risks.

Across the cryptocurrency sector, varied reactions have emerged. The Ethereum and DeFi developer communities voiced strong opposition to any regulation mislabeling protocol developers, potentially stifling innovation. Adams himself highlighted the absurdity of Griffin’s accusations, sparking animated discussions across social media platforms regarding DeFi’s open-source advancements versus traditional financial models.

Ethereum Market Trends and Regulatory Analysis

Did you know? The controversy between Citadel and DeFi reflects a similar dynamic seen during the Constitution DAO incident, illustrating the recurring struggle for dominance and recognition between decentralized platforms and centralized financial interests.

As per CoinMarketCap’s latest data, Ethereum (ETH), a primary DeFi foundation asset, showed a 5.82% increase over the past 24 hours, trading at $3,210.09. The current market cap stands at $387.44 billion, and recent trading volume has surged 14.79% to $31.33 billion.

Ethereum(ETH), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 03:59 UTC on December 4, 2025. Source: CoinMarketCap

According to the Coincu research team, imposing centralized regulatory frameworks on DeFi could deter developers from open-source innovations, potentially leading to fragmented DeFi ecosystems. Historical trends reveal that past regulatory scrutiny typically resulted in market volatility, indicating potential downturn risks in burgeoning DeFi sectors. Ethereum (ETH), a primary DeFi foundation asset showed a 5.82% increase over the past 24 hours, trading at $3,210.09.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/uniswap-citadel-defi-sec-accusation/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

QQQ short term cycle nearing end; pullback likely to attract buyers [Video]

QQQ short term cycle nearing end; pullback likely to attract buyers [Video]

The post QQQ short term cycle nearing end; pullback likely to attract buyers [Video] appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The short-term Elliott Wave outlook for the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) indicates that the cycle from the April 2025 low remains active. Wave (4) of the ongoing impulse concluded at 580.27, and the ETF has since resumed its upward trajectory. To confirm continuation, price must break above the prior wave (3) peak recorded on 30 October at 638.41. The rally from the 21 November wave (4) low has matured and is expected to complete soon, reflecting the natural rhythm of the Elliott Wave sequence. The advance from wave (4) has unfolded as a five-wave impulse. Within this structure, wave ((i)) ended at 586.25, followed by a corrective pullback in wave ((ii)) that terminated at 580.36. From there, the ETF nested higher. Wave (i) of the next sequence ended at 596.98, while wave (ii) pulled back to 589.44. Momentum carried wave (iii) to 606.76, before wave (iv) corrected to 597.32. The final leg, wave (v), reached 619.51, completing wave ((iii)) at a higher degree. A subsequent pullback in wave ((iv)) ended at 612.13. Looking ahead, wave ((v)) of 1 is expected to finish soon. Afterward, a corrective wave 2 should unfold, addressing the cycle from the 21 November low before the ETF resumes higher. In the near term, as long as the pivot at 580.27 remains intact, dips are anticipated to find support in a 3, 7, or 11 swing sequence, reinforcing prospects for further upside. Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) 30-minute Elliott Wave chart from 12.5.2025 Nasdaq 100 ETF Elliott Wave [Video] Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/qqq-short-term-cycle-nearing-end-pullback-likely-to-attract-buyers-video-202512050323
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/05 11:40