The post NVIDIA Stock Rallied 8%, But 3 Signals Point to a Reversal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NVIDIA (NVDA) stock price surged roughly 8% between MarchThe post NVIDIA Stock Rallied 8%, But 3 Signals Point to a Reversal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NVIDIA (NVDA) stock price surged roughly 8% between March

NVIDIA Stock Rallied 8%, But 3 Signals Point to a Reversal

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

NVIDIA (NVDA) stock price surged roughly 8% between March 30 and April 1, reclaiming $175.75 after weeks of selling pressure.

The rally had clear catalysts. However, underneath the optimism, institutional money flow, options positioning, and a historic macro correlation all point to fading strength. For a high-valuation growth stock like NVIDIA, the combination could turn an 8% gain into a setup for a sharper move lower.

NVIDIA Stock Rallied 8%, but Institutional Money Disagreed

NVIDIA stock jumped 5.6% on March 31 alone after the company announced a $2 billion strategic investment in Marvell Technology.

Want more insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Newsletter here.

Broader market sentiment added fuel as hopes of de-escalation in the Iran conflict pushed equities higher, with the S&P 500 gaining and the Nasdaq climbing on the same day.

The chart that tracks this 8% move, however, reveals a problem underneath. Chaikin Money Flow (CMF), a proxy for institutional buying and selling pressure, diverged sharply from the price action. Between March 27 and April 1, while NVDA stock price trended higher, CMF trended lower, deepening further below the zero line to -0.23.

A rising price paired with falling CMF creates a bearish divergence, suggesting the rally was driven by short covering or retail momentum rather than sustained institutional accumulation.

CMF Divergence: TradingView

The macro backdrop explains why institutions stayed on the sidelines. Over the last 50 trading sessions, the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and the United States Oil ETF (USO) have moved in opposite directions in 38 sessions. That 76% inverse correlation rate is the highest in at least 20 years. During this window, crude oil surged over 72% while the S&P 500 declined 4%.

The economic logic hits NVIDIA shares harder than most. Rising oil feeds directly into consumer price inflation through transport and logistics costs. Higher inflation makes the Federal Reserve less likely to cut rates, which pressures expensive growth stocks that depend on cheap capital and future earnings expectations.

A single $2 billion partnership cannot offset a macro force that has been reshaping equity flows for 50 consecutive sessions. The question then becomes whether the options market agrees with the skepticism.

Options Traders Used the Strength to Bet Against It

The NVDA put-call ratio confirms what CMF already flagged. On March 31, when the Marvell deal drove the strongest session of the rally, the put-call volume ratio sat at 0.67, meaning call activity dominated as traders chased the move higher. By April 1, the volume ratio had climbed to 0.77 as significantly more bearish bets entered the market.

The open interest ratio shifted in the same direction, slipping from 0.88 to 0.87. While the move appears small, the direction matters. A rising volume ratio combined with declining open interest suggests that long positions were being closed while new short positions were being opened.

NVDA Put-Call Ratio Shift: Barchart

In practical terms, traders who had been positioned for upside took profits during the rally, while a new wave of participants used the elevated price to initiate downside bets.

That behavioral shift, happening within 24 hours of the rally’s peak session, is consistent with what the CMF divergence showed. Institutional capital did not back the 8% move, and now options traders are actively positioning against its continuation.

NVIDIA Stock Price Faces a Pattern With 15% Downside

The daily NVDA chart reveals a head and shoulders pattern forming since late 2025, a bearish reversal pattern. On April 1, NVIDIA stock price attempted to reclaim the 20-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), a short-term trend indicator that gives greater weight to recent price action, at $176 but failed to close above it. That rejection adds technical validation to the right shoulder and aligns with the institutional skepticism identified in the previous sections.

Bearish Pattern: TradingView

The 50-day EMA at $180 and the 100-day EMA at $181 sit just above, creating a dense resistance cluster. For the bearish thesis to fail, NVIDIA stock needs a clean daily close above $177 to reclaim the 20-day EMA. A push through the $180-$181 zone would weaken the right shoulder and shift momentum.

On the downside, losing $169, the 0.236 Fibonacci level, on a daily closing basis could accelerate selling toward $164. The $164 to $160 zone represents the critical support band. A close below $160 confirms the neckline break, which could then activate a measured move target of approximately 15% downside to $138.

Nvidia Price Analysis: TradingView

Head and shoulders patterns do not always resolve in the expected direction. De-escalation in the Iran conflict remains the most likely catalyst for invalidation. If oil prices pull back, the inverse grip on equities loosens, inflation expectations ease, and rate-sensitive growth stocks like NVIDIA benefit disproportionately. The $164 to $160 zone could act as a floor if diplomatic progress arrives.

The post NVIDIA Stock Rallied 8%, But 3 Signals Point to a Reversal appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/nvidia-stock-inverse-grip-rally-risk-analysis/

Market Opportunity
Movement Logo
Movement Price(MOVE)
$0.01572
$0.01572$0.01572
-3.26%
USD
Movement (MOVE) Live Price Chart

AI Strategy: Powered 24/7

AI Strategy: Powered 24/7AI Strategy: Powered 24/7

Generate automated strategies using natural language

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Treasury’s first GENIUS rule tightens Washington’s grip on who can scale stablecoins

Treasury’s first GENIUS rule tightens Washington’s grip on who can scale stablecoins

Treasury’s first proposed rule under the GENIUS Act does more than outline stablecoin supervision, as it shows where control sits as the market scales: states may
Share
CryptoSlate2026/04/02 19:10
Binance Perpetual Futures Revolution: QQQ and Major US Stocks Enter Crypto Derivatives Market with 10x Leverage

Binance Perpetual Futures Revolution: QQQ and Major US Stocks Enter Crypto Derivatives Market with 10x Leverage

BitcoinWorld Binance Perpetual Futures Revolution: QQQ and Major US Stocks Enter Crypto Derivatives Market with 10x Leverage In a groundbreaking move that bridges
Share
bitcoinworld2026/04/02 18:00
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36

No Chart Skills? Still Profit

No Chart Skills? Still ProfitNo Chart Skills? Still Profit

Copy top traders in 3s with auto trading!