The Philippine Tax Whiz provides clarification on the proper tax treatment of Cross-Border Services in accordance with the previous revenue issuances (i.e., RMC No. 5-2024 and RMC No. 38-2024) and the latest guidance in Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 24-2026.

Cross-border services have become increasingly common with the rise of digitalization and global business operations. However, determining the correct tax treatment and assessment has often been challenging.

This guide presents key points from the circular to help taxpayers and revenue officers navigate the tax implications of international service arrangements.

What are cross-border services?

These are services that are performed, rendered, delivered or supplied by a Non-Resident Foreign Corporation (NRFC) to a domestic/resident entity in the philippines..

Examples include  the following or similar transaction as stated in RMC No. 5-2024 such as consulting, IT outsourcing, and telecommunications.

However, it does not mean that they are in the classification provided means that they are automatically subjected to Philippine income tax or final withholding tax.

Taxation depends on where the service is performed or where the benefit of the service is received. The Aces Philippines case broadened this rule by allowing taxation when the income-producing activity or benefit occurs in the Philippines. Therefore, revenue officers must establish if the income source is actually within the Philippines before applying tax.

How is taxability determined?

To determine if a cross-border service is taxable, the revenue officer needs to review the entire service agreement. This helps identify where the income-producing activity actually took place.

The following factors are usually considered:

1. The parties – There should be a Philippine resident paying a non-resident service provider whose service is essential to the transaction.
2. The service – The activity performed must result in actual payment or accrual, meaning the non-resident receives an economic benefit.
3. The situs – The income-producing activity should occur within the Philippines.
4. No exemptions apply under tax treaties or domestic law.

This comprehensive review is necessary because isolating a single activity does not suffice; the service must be considered as a whole, consistent with Article 1233 of the Civil Code, which states that an obligation is considered fulfilled only when the service has been completely delivered or rendered.

Is BIR ruling required for confirming the taxability or non-taxability of cross-border transactions?

No, it is not mandatory for a taxpayer to get a ruling from the BIR to confirm whether a cross-border transaction is taxable or not. You can apply the correct tax treatment as long as you have solid legal and factual evidence to support your claim during the assessment process.

However, if you want extra assurance, you may request a ruling from the BIR to officially confirm that the income is not taxable, following the existing rules and procedures. – Rappler.com

Mon Abrea is a Global Tax Policy Expert and Chief Tax Advisor of the Asian Consulting Group (ACG), the Philippines’ premier tax advisory and investment consulting firm—providing tax strategy, compliance, and policy advisory services to multinational corporations, foreign investors, and government institutions. For strategic tax advisory, CONSULT ACG, or you may also send an email to consult@acg.ph to host investment and tax briefing in key cities across Asia, Middle East, Oceania, Europe and North America.