TLDR Ripple cannot freely sell its escrowed XRP tokens due to specific restrictions in place. Approximately 40% of XRP’s total supply is held under escrow, limiting its market availability. XRP’s maximum supply is 100 billion tokens, with around 59.24 billion circulating in the market. Ripple releases one billion XRP monthly from escrow but returns most [...] The post XRP Distribution Revealed: Ripple Can’t Freely Sell Escrowed Tokens appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Ripple cannot freely sell its escrowed XRP tokens due to specific restrictions in place. Approximately 40% of XRP’s total supply is held under escrow, limiting its market availability. XRP’s maximum supply is 100 billion tokens, with around 59.24 billion circulating in the market. Ripple releases one billion XRP monthly from escrow but returns most [...] The post XRP Distribution Revealed: Ripple Can’t Freely Sell Escrowed Tokens appeared first on CoinCentral.

XRP Distribution Revealed: Ripple Can’t Freely Sell Escrowed Tokens

TLDR

  • Ripple cannot freely sell its escrowed XRP tokens due to specific restrictions in place.
  • Approximately 40% of XRP’s total supply is held under escrow, limiting its market availability.
  • XRP’s maximum supply is 100 billion tokens, with around 59.24 billion circulating in the market.
  • Ripple releases one billion XRP monthly from escrow but returns most of it back to the lock.
  • Around 10 million XRP have been burned through transaction fees, reducing the supply.

XRP Distribution Revealed: Ripple Can’t Freely Sell Escrowed Tokens. A recent graphic by crypto researcher SMQKE sheds light on the distribution of XRP, revealing important details about Ripple’s holdings. The graphic, attributed to SBI Group, emphasizes that Ripple is not free to sell off its escrowed tokens. The slide provides insight into the structure of XRP’s maximum supply, its circulation, and how Ripple’s escrow works.

XRP’s Maximum Supply and Circulating Tokens

XRP’s total maximum supply stands at 100 billion tokens. Currently, about 59.24 billion XRP are circulating in the market. These circulating tokens contribute to the market’s valuation, which is approximately 28 trillion Japanese yen. The tokens in circulation represent the active trading portion of XRP.

Around 10 million XRP have been burned, primarily through transaction fees. This burning process reduces the overall supply and increases the scarcity of XRP. The reduction in supply is important for the token’s long-term value and market perception.

Ripple’s Non-Circulating Holdings and Escrow Restrictions

Ripple’s non-circulating XRP holdings are separated into two categories. The company directly holds about 4.85 billion XRP that are not in circulation. Additionally, about 35.9 billion XRP tokens are held under escrow.

As of July 2025, nearly 40% of XRP’s total supply is locked in escrow. The terms of these escrow arrangements prevent Ripple from freely selling these tokens. The escrowed tokens cannot be accessed until specific conditions are met.

The escrow system plays a critical role in maintaining the predictability of XRP’s supply. Since 2017, Ripple has been releasing one billion XRP from escrow monthly. However, Ripple returns most of these released tokens, with only a small portion used for operations.

This structured release of XRP ensures stability in the market by reducing the risk of large-scale sales. Michel Blanc, a prominent commentator, describes this approach as a strength for XRP. He argues that this system reinforces long-term scarcity, which benefits investors.

The post XRP Distribution Revealed: Ripple Can’t Freely Sell Escrowed Tokens appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0,010097
$0,010097$0,010097
+%1,17
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 14, 2026

Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 14, 2026

The crypto market is up today, with the cryptocurrency market capitalisation rising by 3.6% to $3.33 trillion. At the time of writing, 95 of the top 100 coins have
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/14 20:04