PANews reported on October 17 that according to OneKey’s Chinese Twitter account, regarding the random number vulnerability involved in the recent “Milk Sad incident,” the OneKey team clarified that the vulnerability does not affect the security of the mnemonics and private keys of OneKey’s software and hardware wallets. The vulnerability stems from Libbitcoin Explorer (bx) 3.x, which uses a pseudo-random number generator based on the system time and the Mersenne Twister-32 algorithm. With a seed space of only 2³² bits, attackers can predict or brute-force the private key. This vulnerability affects some older versions of Trust Wallet and all products using bx 3.x or older versions of Trust Wallet Core. OneKey stated that its hardware wallet utilizes an EAL6+ security chip with a built-in TRNG true random number generator; older devices have also passed SP800-22 and FIPS140-2 entropy testing; while its software wallet utilizes a system-level CSPRNG entropy source to generate random numbers, complying with cryptographic standards. The team emphasized that users are advised to use hardware wallets to manage their assets and not import mnemonics generated by software wallets into hardware wallets to ensure maximum security.PANews reported on October 17 that according to OneKey’s Chinese Twitter account, regarding the random number vulnerability involved in the recent “Milk Sad incident,” the OneKey team clarified that the vulnerability does not affect the security of the mnemonics and private keys of OneKey’s software and hardware wallets. The vulnerability stems from Libbitcoin Explorer (bx) 3.x, which uses a pseudo-random number generator based on the system time and the Mersenne Twister-32 algorithm. With a seed space of only 2³² bits, attackers can predict or brute-force the private key. This vulnerability affects some older versions of Trust Wallet and all products using bx 3.x or older versions of Trust Wallet Core. OneKey stated that its hardware wallet utilizes an EAL6+ security chip with a built-in TRNG true random number generator; older devices have also passed SP800-22 and FIPS140-2 entropy testing; while its software wallet utilizes a system-level CSPRNG entropy source to generate random numbers, complying with cryptographic standards. The team emphasized that users are advised to use hardware wallets to manage their assets and not import mnemonics generated by software wallets into hardware wallets to ensure maximum security.
OneKey responds to the Milk Sad incident: Confirmed vulnerability does not affect the security of its software and hardware wallets
PANews reported on October 17 that according to OneKey’s Chinese Twitter account, regarding the random number vulnerability involved in the recent “Milk Sad incident,” the OneKey team clarified that the vulnerability does not affect the security of the mnemonics and private keys of OneKey’s software and hardware wallets.
The vulnerability stems from Libbitcoin Explorer (bx) 3.x, which uses a pseudo-random number generator based on the system time and the Mersenne Twister-32 algorithm. With a seed space of only 2³² bits, attackers can predict or brute-force the private key. This vulnerability affects some older versions of Trust Wallet and all products using bx 3.x or older versions of Trust Wallet Core.
OneKey stated that its hardware wallet utilizes an EAL6+ security chip with a built-in TRNG true random number generator; older devices have also passed SP800-22 and FIPS140-2 entropy testing; while its software wallet utilizes a system-level CSPRNG entropy source to generate random numbers, complying with cryptographic standards. The team emphasized that users are advised to use hardware wallets to manage their assets and not import mnemonics generated by software wallets into hardware wallets to ensure maximum security.
Market Opportunity
MilkyWay Price(MILK)
$0.002267
$0.002267$0.002267
USD
MilkyWay (MILK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For
The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush. Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs. Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Zwitserse bankgigant UBS wil crypto beleggen mogelijk maken
De grootste vermogensbeheerder ter wereld, UBS, maakt zich op om een stap te zetten richting crypto. Volgens bronnen binnen de bank kijkt het Zwitserse concern
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 02:48
Trump Nears Decision on New Federal Reserve Chair
The post Trump Nears Decision on New Federal Reserve Chair appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Trump nears decision on Federal Reserve Chair, evaluating
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/24 02:53