The post The Boss Who Emails At Midnight And Other Leadership Nightmares That Drive Employees Away appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. People leave bad bosses. getty “People don’t leave jobs. They leave bad bosses.” There is truth to this unattributable quote. (I searched Google and ChatGPT, and neither could give me the definitive origin of this quote.) Validation comes from numerous articles and studies that claim a large percentage of employees quit their jobs because of bad managers. A Harvard Business Review article, Quiet Quitting Is About Bad Bosses, Not Bad Employees by Jack Zenger and Joseph Folman, explains that employees don’t have to outright leave their jobs to “quietly quit,” or do only the bare minimum needed to keep their jobs. According to Gallup’s 2024 State of Global Workplace Report, only 23% of employees are engaged, 62% are “not engaged” and 15% are “actively disengaged.” And 70% of the variance in team engagement is due to the manager. When you look at the best companies to buy from, you often find they are also listed on Glassdoor.com as the best companies to work for. That direct correlation isn’t a coincidence. In my customer service and customer experience (CX) work, I recognized decades ago that what’s happening on the inside of an organization is felt by customers on the outside. The employee experience is as important, if not more so, than the customer experience, and the boss can “make or break” that experience. Meet Mita Mallick, who once had a boss who would only communicate with her via email between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. That seemed to be the only time the boss was available. Trying to meet with her boss during normal business hours was an exercise in futility. The message was clear: “I don’t have time for you.” And as a junior employee, Mallick thought she had to respond in real time to keep her job. That experience,… The post The Boss Who Emails At Midnight And Other Leadership Nightmares That Drive Employees Away appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. People leave bad bosses. getty “People don’t leave jobs. They leave bad bosses.” There is truth to this unattributable quote. (I searched Google and ChatGPT, and neither could give me the definitive origin of this quote.) Validation comes from numerous articles and studies that claim a large percentage of employees quit their jobs because of bad managers. A Harvard Business Review article, Quiet Quitting Is About Bad Bosses, Not Bad Employees by Jack Zenger and Joseph Folman, explains that employees don’t have to outright leave their jobs to “quietly quit,” or do only the bare minimum needed to keep their jobs. According to Gallup’s 2024 State of Global Workplace Report, only 23% of employees are engaged, 62% are “not engaged” and 15% are “actively disengaged.” And 70% of the variance in team engagement is due to the manager. When you look at the best companies to buy from, you often find they are also listed on Glassdoor.com as the best companies to work for. That direct correlation isn’t a coincidence. In my customer service and customer experience (CX) work, I recognized decades ago that what’s happening on the inside of an organization is felt by customers on the outside. The employee experience is as important, if not more so, than the customer experience, and the boss can “make or break” that experience. Meet Mita Mallick, who once had a boss who would only communicate with her via email between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. That seemed to be the only time the boss was available. Trying to meet with her boss during normal business hours was an exercise in futility. The message was clear: “I don’t have time for you.” And as a junior employee, Mallick thought she had to respond in real time to keep her job. That experience,…

The Boss Who Emails At Midnight And Other Leadership Nightmares That Drive Employees Away

People leave bad bosses.

getty

“People don’t leave jobs. They leave bad bosses.”

There is truth to this unattributable quote. (I searched Google and ChatGPT, and neither could give me the definitive origin of this quote.) Validation comes from numerous articles and studies that claim a large percentage of employees quit their jobs because of bad managers.

A Harvard Business Review article, Quiet Quitting Is About Bad Bosses, Not Bad Employees by Jack Zenger and Joseph Folman, explains that employees don’t have to outright leave their jobs to “quietly quit,” or do only the bare minimum needed to keep their jobs. According to Gallup’s 2024 State of Global Workplace Report, only 23% of employees are engaged, 62% are “not engaged” and 15% are “actively disengaged.” And 70% of the variance in team engagement is due to the manager.

When you look at the best companies to buy from, you often find they are also listed on Glassdoor.com as the best companies to work for. That direct correlation isn’t a coincidence. In my customer service and customer experience (CX) work, I recognized decades ago that what’s happening on the inside of an organization is felt by customers on the outside. The employee experience is as important, if not more so, than the customer experience, and the boss can “make or break” that experience.

Meet Mita Mallick, who once had a boss who would only communicate with her via email between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. That seemed to be the only time the boss was available. Trying to meet with her boss during normal business hours was an exercise in futility. The message was clear: “I don’t have time for you.” And as a junior employee, Mallick thought she had to respond in real time to keep her job.

That experience, along with others, is why Mallick, who is now an author and speaker on a mission to “fix what’s broken in the workplace,” wrote the book, The Devil Emails at Midnight: What Good Leaders Can Learn from Bad Bosses. This book shares the details of 13 bosses, herself included, who demonstrate what not to do.

I interviewed Mallick for an episode of Amazing Business Radio to learn about some of these bad bosses, in hopes that anyone who falls into that category of leadership might learn a lesson and make their employees’ experience better. Here are descriptions of just a few of the bad bosses Mallick talked about in our interview, along with some of my commentary:

The Boss Who Never Had Time for Employees—Except at Midnight

As mentioned, this is where the book begins, with a boss who didn’t respect employees’ time or explain that just because she worked at midnight, she didn’t expect her employees to do the same. A simple explanation that immediate responses to her late-night emails weren’t necessary would have been easy, but unfortunately for Mallick, that was not the case. Everything seemed urgent, and Mallick emphasized this by saying, “When we treat everything as urgent, nothing is urgent.”

The Lesson: Leadership means making time for your team. Respect employees’ time and boundaries.

The Boss Who Wouldn’t Call an Employee by Name

Mallick shared that a boss didn’t want to call her by her full first name, Madhumita. Because he struggled to pronounce her full name, he renamed her Mohammed. One day, she worked up the courage to say, “You can call me Mita,” but the insensitive boss smiled and said, “Oh, Mohammed is funny. Everyone loves it. Don’t be so sensitive!” No doubt an HR issue by today’s standards, this boss showed a lack of respect for a good employee.

The Lesson: Calling people by their correct names is a basic courtesy and sign of respect. But there’s more to this. It’s not just about a name. Recognizing something sensitive and/or important to an employee should be acknowledged and accepted. Teasing about it will, at a minimum, put distance between the boss and employee.

The Boss Who Was Filled with Toxic Positivity

An upbeat and energetic boss is great, but ignoring real problems and acting like everything is fine is known as toxic positivity. If the facts indicate that something isn’t possible, then pretending it is can set a team up for failure and disappointment. Cheerleading only helps so much. If the boss hypes everyone up to believe something impossible can be done, and then the team fails, it can be demoralizing to the team.

The Lesson: Leaders should inspire, but not at the cost of reality.

Final Words

The worst behaviors in any workplace become part of its culture if they are allowed to continue. Whether it’s disrespect, slacking off or bullying, what leaders let slide becomes the norm. Look at yourself in the mirror and ask, “Am I one of these people causing the problem?” Creating a positive environment means taking action when problems arise, not ignoring them. A healthy workplace looks out for everyone, not just the loudest or most powerful voices.

The Final Lesson: Culture is defined by what is tolerated and demonstrated by the boss.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/shephyken/2025/10/19/the-boss-who-emails-at-midnight-and-other-leadership-nightmares-that-drive-employees-away/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump ally drops bombshell claim GOP 'deliberately' sabotaging him with impeachment plot

Trump ally drops bombshell claim GOP 'deliberately' sabotaging him with impeachment plot

Right-wing conspiracy theorist and activist Laura Loomer unleashed a bombshell claim Friday night that members of the Republican Party are intentionally tanking
Share
Rawstory2026/01/24 09:35
IBM Qiskit v2.3 Adds C API Expansion for Quantum-HPC Integration

IBM Qiskit v2.3 Adds C API Expansion for Quantum-HPC Integration

The post IBM Qiskit v2.3 Adds C API Expansion for Quantum-HPC Integration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Joerg Hiller Jan 23, 2026 18:06 IBM releases
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/24 09:31
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40