The post Beijing Halts Tech Giants’ Stablecoin Ambitions in Hong Kong: FT appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China has moved to block private stablecoin ambitions in Hong Kong, in what could be interpreted as an effort to reaffirm its state authority over monetary policy. Two of China’s largest technology companies, Alibaba-backed Ant Group and JD.com, an e-commerce group, have been instructed to suspend their stablecoin plans in Hong Kong. That follows guidance from the People’s Bank of China and the Cyberspace Administration of China, which warned against allowing private entities to issue currency-like assets, according to a Saturday report from the Financial Times.  Beijing’s move signals a recalibration of Hong Kong’s role in digital assets as it aligns with Beijing’s regulatory priorities. Instead of expanding on retail speculation, it shows a push toward disciplined, cross-border compliance where innovation is tolerated only within clearly defined state and policy boundaries. There appears to be a tendency to “push a narrative that Hong Kong could serve as a loophole for mainland firms to circumvent PRC crypto restrictions, especially around stablecoins,” Joshua Chu, lawyer, lecturer, and co-chair of the Hong Kong Web3 Association, told Decrypt. “This was never Beijing’s intention,” Chu said, noting how China’s crypto strategy “views speculative retail participation within the mainland as off-limits.” What’s happening “is a natural refinement emphasizing responsible innovation and compliance rather than speculative hype,” he explained. “Hong Kong’s reputation depends on maintaining a clean, sophisticated framework that supports genuine market growth without undermining Beijing’s policies.” Beijing’s intention for Hong Kong’s stablecoin regime is “designed to absorb foreign crypto capital, not serve as a conduit for domestic mainland transactions,” Chu said, adding that there is a misconception around private entities that neglects China’s pronouncement from 2021 regarding risks in speculative virtual currency transactions, which are still in effect. The directive comes just months after both firms signaled interest in Hong Kong’s new stablecoin framework… The post Beijing Halts Tech Giants’ Stablecoin Ambitions in Hong Kong: FT appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China has moved to block private stablecoin ambitions in Hong Kong, in what could be interpreted as an effort to reaffirm its state authority over monetary policy. Two of China’s largest technology companies, Alibaba-backed Ant Group and JD.com, an e-commerce group, have been instructed to suspend their stablecoin plans in Hong Kong. That follows guidance from the People’s Bank of China and the Cyberspace Administration of China, which warned against allowing private entities to issue currency-like assets, according to a Saturday report from the Financial Times.  Beijing’s move signals a recalibration of Hong Kong’s role in digital assets as it aligns with Beijing’s regulatory priorities. Instead of expanding on retail speculation, it shows a push toward disciplined, cross-border compliance where innovation is tolerated only within clearly defined state and policy boundaries. There appears to be a tendency to “push a narrative that Hong Kong could serve as a loophole for mainland firms to circumvent PRC crypto restrictions, especially around stablecoins,” Joshua Chu, lawyer, lecturer, and co-chair of the Hong Kong Web3 Association, told Decrypt. “This was never Beijing’s intention,” Chu said, noting how China’s crypto strategy “views speculative retail participation within the mainland as off-limits.” What’s happening “is a natural refinement emphasizing responsible innovation and compliance rather than speculative hype,” he explained. “Hong Kong’s reputation depends on maintaining a clean, sophisticated framework that supports genuine market growth without undermining Beijing’s policies.” Beijing’s intention for Hong Kong’s stablecoin regime is “designed to absorb foreign crypto capital, not serve as a conduit for domestic mainland transactions,” Chu said, adding that there is a misconception around private entities that neglects China’s pronouncement from 2021 regarding risks in speculative virtual currency transactions, which are still in effect. The directive comes just months after both firms signaled interest in Hong Kong’s new stablecoin framework…

Beijing Halts Tech Giants’ Stablecoin Ambitions in Hong Kong: FT

China has moved to block private stablecoin ambitions in Hong Kong, in what could be interpreted as an effort to reaffirm its state authority over monetary policy.

Two of China’s largest technology companies, Alibaba-backed Ant Group and JD.com, an e-commerce group, have been instructed to suspend their stablecoin plans in Hong Kong.

That follows guidance from the People’s Bank of China and the Cyberspace Administration of China, which warned against allowing private entities to issue currency-like assets, according to a Saturday report from the Financial Times.

Beijing’s move signals a recalibration of Hong Kong’s role in digital assets as it aligns with Beijing’s regulatory priorities. Instead of expanding on retail speculation, it shows a push toward disciplined, cross-border compliance where innovation is tolerated only within clearly defined state and policy boundaries.

There appears to be a tendency to “push a narrative that Hong Kong could serve as a loophole for mainland firms to circumvent PRC crypto restrictions, especially around stablecoins,” Joshua Chu, lawyer, lecturer, and co-chair of the Hong Kong Web3 Association, told Decrypt.

“This was never Beijing’s intention,” Chu said, noting how China’s crypto strategy “views speculative retail participation within the mainland as off-limits.”

What’s happening “is a natural refinement emphasizing responsible innovation and compliance rather than speculative hype,” he explained. “Hong Kong’s reputation depends on maintaining a clean, sophisticated framework that supports genuine market growth without undermining Beijing’s policies.”

Beijing’s intention for Hong Kong’s stablecoin regime is “designed to absorb foreign crypto capital, not serve as a conduit for domestic mainland transactions,” Chu said, adding that there is a misconception around private entities that neglects China’s pronouncement from 2021 regarding risks in speculative virtual currency transactions, which are still in effect.

The directive comes just months after both firms signaled interest in Hong Kong’s new stablecoin framework in June, even as mainland officials warned of persisting stablecoin scams.

Ant Group, whose payment arm previously partnered with Circle in July to support cross-border settlements using USDC, had planned to apply through its international division, while JD.com explored global stablecoin licenses in June to cut costs.

The PBoC reportedly told both firms not to proceed, warning that private stablecoins could blur the line between financial tech and sovereign monetary policy. Officials cited risks to capital supervision and potential overlap with the e-CNY, China’s central bank digital currency, which remains the cornerstone of Beijing’s long-term payments strategy.

An earlier analysis from Decrypt explored how China’s early stablecoin studies pointed to a tiered but fragmented strategy, where state-backed banks, licensed payment firms, and private fintech companies were each exploring separate digital-currency models instead of a unified framework, showing competing priorities within the system.

Late last month, Chinese regulators reportedly instructed several mainland-linked brokerages to similarly pause real-world asset tokenization efforts in Hong Kong, reflecting continued caution toward privately managed blockchain projects amid broader reviews of cross-border financial activity.

Decrypt reached out to Ant Group and JD.com for comment.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Source: https://decrypt.co/344925/beijing-halts-tech-giants-stablecoin-ambitions-in-hong-kong

Market Opportunity
CyberKongz Logo
CyberKongz Price(KONG)
$0,001408
$0,001408$0,001408
-36,60%
USD
CyberKongz (KONG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Price Prediction  — Recovery on Thin Ice as Ripple’s Global License Count Soars Past 75

XRP Price Prediction — Recovery on Thin Ice as Ripple’s Global License Count Soars Past 75

XRP Recovery Hits Resistance: $1.95 Breakout Needed to Reignite Bullish MomentumAccording to market analyst HolderStat, XRP’s rebound is at a pivotal juncture,
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 15:11
House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

The post House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline House Judiciary Committee Republicans blocked a Democrat effort Wednesday to subpoena a group of major banks as part of a renewed investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s financial ties. Congressman Jim Jordan, R-OH, is the chairman of the committee. (Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images) Anadolu via Getty Images Key Facts A near party-line vote squashed the effort to vote on a subpoena, with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who is leading a separate effort to force the Justice Department to release more Epstein case materials, voting alongside Democrats. The vote, if successful, would have resulted in the issuing of subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing and Bank of New York Mellon CEO Robin Vince. The subpoenas would have specifically looked into multiple reports that claimed the four banks flagged $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Epstein. The failed effort from Democrats followed an FBI oversight hearing in which agency director Kash Patel misleadingly claimed the FBI cannot release many of the files it has on Epstein. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Crucial Quote Dimon, who attended a lunch with Senate Republicans before the vote, according to Politico, told reporters, “We regret any association with that man at all. And, of course, if it’s a legal requirement, we would conform to it. We have no issue with that.” Chief Critic “Republicans had the chance to subpoena the CEOs of JPMorgan, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of New York Mellon to expose Epstein’s money trail,” the House Judiciary Democrats said in a tweet. “Instead, they tried to bury…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:02
Surprising February Gains Elevate Shiba Inu Over Dogecoin in Meme Coin Arena

Surprising February Gains Elevate Shiba Inu Over Dogecoin in Meme Coin Arena

The post Surprising February Gains Elevate Shiba Inu Over Dogecoin in Meme Coin Arena appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a twist of expectations within the
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/24 16:30