Bitcoin (BTC) forced the closure of $740 million in leveraged positions on Oct. 21 as the price swung from $110,552 to $114,019 before retreating toward $108,000, executing a classic short-squeeze followed by long liquidations that cleared excessive derivatives exposure. Data from Coinglass shows $435.63 million in long positions and $304.64 million in shorts eliminated during […] The post $740M wiped out: Did Bitcoin just clear the leverage overhang? appeared first on CryptoSlate.Bitcoin (BTC) forced the closure of $740 million in leveraged positions on Oct. 21 as the price swung from $110,552 to $114,019 before retreating toward $108,000, executing a classic short-squeeze followed by long liquidations that cleared excessive derivatives exposure. Data from Coinglass shows $435.63 million in long positions and $304.64 million in shorts eliminated during […] The post $740M wiped out: Did Bitcoin just clear the leverage overhang? appeared first on CryptoSlate.

$740M wiped out: Did Bitcoin just clear the leverage overhang?

2025/10/22 19:00
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Bitcoin (BTC) forced the closure of $740 million in leveraged positions on Oct. 21 as the price swung from $110,552 to $114,019 before retreating toward $108,000, executing a classic short-squeeze followed by long liquidations that cleared excessive derivatives exposure.

Data from Coinglass shows $435.63 million in long positions and $304.64 million in shorts eliminated during the 24 hours.

When Bitcoin broke through the $111,500 liquidity zone, perpetual shorts faced cascading margin calls, reaching up to $114,000.

As upward momentum waned, long positions that had chased the breakout were liquidated during the decline, a pop-and-flush pattern characteristic of leverage resets.

Approximately $320 million in unwinds occurred around the dip to $108,000, with variations across data providers depending on the measurement window.

Funding rates entering the session sat near neutral following the prior week’s selloff, while futures open interest rebuilt toward $26 billion.

Open interest across futures and perpetuals held relatively stable through the volatility. CoinMarketCap data shows that futures open interest registered $3.47 billion, with a 0.91% daily increase, while perpetuals showed $969.71 billion, with a 0.02% decline.

Funding rates compressed from positive 0.005% to 0.004%, reflecting reduced willingness to pay premiums for leveraged long exposure after the round-trip price action eliminated speculative positions on both sides.

Derivatives neutrality signals a cleaner setup

The liquidation sequence left funding rates roughly flat and open interest lower than recent peaks, removing the overhang of crowded positioning that amplifies volatility.

Confirmation of a genuine reset requires several observable conditions over the following 24 to 48 hours.

Open interest (OI) should remain below prior peaks rather than immediately rebuilding through fresh leverage. OI-weighted funding rates need to center near zero percent across major venues, indicating balanced positioning between longs and shorts.

Rising spot trading volume as a share of total Bitcoin activity would strengthen the reset thesis, showing price discovery driven by spot demand rather than derivatives positioning.

CME basis behavior provides additional confirmation, while exchange-traded fund (ETF) flows turning net-flat to positive after periods of outflows would add support.

According to Farside Investors’ data, spot Bitcoin ETFs registered $214.3 million of inflows as of press time, with IBIT and five other funds to be included in the tally. The move reverses four consecutive days of outflows totaling over $1 billion.

Bitcoin’s ability to sustain moves above $110,000 depends on whether spot demand can absorb the reset positioning.

The $5,541 intraday range on Oct. 21 cleared speculative excess, but directional conviction requires spot volume to increase relative to perpetual and futures activity.

Monitoring open interest stability, funding rate behavior, and the perpetual-spot basis over the next two days will clarify whether the liquidation wave established a foundation for sustained movement or merely paused before another volatility cycle begins.

The post $740M wiped out: Did Bitcoin just clear the leverage overhang? appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement

Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement

The post Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. What Mastercard’s Crypto Partner Program is and how it
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/12 10:44
South Africa launches HIV vaccine trial

South Africa launches HIV vaccine trial

South Africa HIV vaccine trial efforts are advancing after researchers launched the first locally developed HIV vaccine study on the continent.   South Africa expands
Share
Furtherafrica2026/03/12 09:30