The post Melania Trump and Javier Milei ‘Unwitting Faces’ of $57M Meme Coin Fraud, Suit Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR: Founders allegedly used one-sided liquidity pools to extract around $107 M from the LIBRA token launch. The complaint states that over 760 M LIBRA tokens (76% of supply) were transferred by insiders shortly after minting. The court ordered freeze of approx. $110 M in LIBRA proceeds and ~$57.65 M USDC in specific wallets. Plaintiffs claim founder Benjamin Chow orchestrated at least 15 tokens and used the names of Melania Trump and Javier Milei as promotional fronts. A U.S. class-action lawsuit now accuses crypto startup founder Benjamin Chow of running a pump-and-dump network around meme coins such as “MELANIA” and “LIBRA”.  Investors allege Chow used his firm and associates to launch tokens tied to major names, leading to rapid collapses and big losses for retail buyers. A recent court order froze roughly $57.65 million in USDC and approx. $110 million in token-proceeds held in wallets controlled by the defendants.  The filing, part of the case Hurlock v. Kelsier Ventures, lays out detailed liquidity-manipulation allegations and claims a coordinated scheme spanning at least fifteen tokens. Source: court filing and public coverage. Token scheme and crypto price manipulation with LIBRA The complaint alleges that the token known as LIBRA was marketed as a tool to fund small businesses in Argentina and was backed by public figure Javier Milei. Yet the filing claims the promotional story masked a design to inflate crypto price and allow insiders to cash out. Specifically, the document states that Kelsier Ventures and its team minted one billion LIBRA tokens, then transferred about 760 million (76 % of supply) into wallets they controlled. It further alleges that under the infrastructure provided by Chow’s firm Meteora, the team used single-sided liquidity pools that allowed insiders to extract stable assets such as USDC and SOL. According to the complaint, within hours of the launch investors lost as much as 94 %… The post Melania Trump and Javier Milei ‘Unwitting Faces’ of $57M Meme Coin Fraud, Suit Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR: Founders allegedly used one-sided liquidity pools to extract around $107 M from the LIBRA token launch. The complaint states that over 760 M LIBRA tokens (76% of supply) were transferred by insiders shortly after minting. The court ordered freeze of approx. $110 M in LIBRA proceeds and ~$57.65 M USDC in specific wallets. Plaintiffs claim founder Benjamin Chow orchestrated at least 15 tokens and used the names of Melania Trump and Javier Milei as promotional fronts. A U.S. class-action lawsuit now accuses crypto startup founder Benjamin Chow of running a pump-and-dump network around meme coins such as “MELANIA” and “LIBRA”.  Investors allege Chow used his firm and associates to launch tokens tied to major names, leading to rapid collapses and big losses for retail buyers. A recent court order froze roughly $57.65 million in USDC and approx. $110 million in token-proceeds held in wallets controlled by the defendants.  The filing, part of the case Hurlock v. Kelsier Ventures, lays out detailed liquidity-manipulation allegations and claims a coordinated scheme spanning at least fifteen tokens. Source: court filing and public coverage. Token scheme and crypto price manipulation with LIBRA The complaint alleges that the token known as LIBRA was marketed as a tool to fund small businesses in Argentina and was backed by public figure Javier Milei. Yet the filing claims the promotional story masked a design to inflate crypto price and allow insiders to cash out. Specifically, the document states that Kelsier Ventures and its team minted one billion LIBRA tokens, then transferred about 760 million (76 % of supply) into wallets they controlled. It further alleges that under the infrastructure provided by Chow’s firm Meteora, the team used single-sided liquidity pools that allowed insiders to extract stable assets such as USDC and SOL. According to the complaint, within hours of the launch investors lost as much as 94 %…

Melania Trump and Javier Milei ‘Unwitting Faces’ of $57M Meme Coin Fraud, Suit Says

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

TLDR:

  • Founders allegedly used one-sided liquidity pools to extract around $107 M from the LIBRA token launch.
  • The complaint states that over 760 M LIBRA tokens (76% of supply) were transferred by insiders shortly after minting.
  • The court ordered freeze of approx. $110 M in LIBRA proceeds and ~$57.65 M USDC in specific wallets.
  • Plaintiffs claim founder Benjamin Chow orchestrated at least 15 tokens and used the names of Melania Trump and Javier Milei as promotional fronts.

A U.S. class-action lawsuit now accuses crypto startup founder Benjamin Chow of running a pump-and-dump network around meme coins such as “MELANIA” and “LIBRA”. 

Investors allege Chow used his firm and associates to launch tokens tied to major names, leading to rapid collapses and big losses for retail buyers. A recent court order froze roughly $57.65 million in USDC and approx. $110 million in token-proceeds held in wallets controlled by the defendants. 

The filing, part of the case Hurlock v. Kelsier Ventures, lays out detailed liquidity-manipulation allegations and claims a coordinated scheme spanning at least fifteen tokens. Source: court filing and public coverage.

Token scheme and crypto price manipulation with LIBRA

The complaint alleges that the token known as LIBRA was marketed as a tool to fund small businesses in Argentina and was backed by public figure Javier Milei. Yet the filing claims the promotional story masked a design to inflate crypto price and allow insiders to cash out.

Specifically, the document states that Kelsier Ventures and its team minted one billion LIBRA tokens, then transferred about 760 million (76 % of supply) into wallets they controlled. It further alleges that under the infrastructure provided by Chow’s firm Meteora, the team used single-sided liquidity pools that allowed insiders to extract stable assets such as USDC and SOL.

According to the complaint, within hours of the launch investors lost as much as 94 % of token value.

Founder role, promo fronts and the frozen assets order

According to the filing, Benjamin Chow sits “at the center of the enterprise”. He allegedly recruited a small network including the Davis family via Kelsier Ventures and ran an infrastructure of at least fifteen pump-and-dump tokens.

The complaint claims that names like Melania Trump and Javier Milei were used more as promotional props than genuine participants. The token “MELANIA” tied to Melania Trump reportedly surged then crashed by 99 %.

In its May 29 2025 order, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York froze “approximately $110 million in LIBRA proceeds” plus “approximately 57,654,371 USDC” in two identified wallets.

Later filings indicate the TRO was vacated and the USDC un-frozen after defense motion.

Investors and crypto traders should watch this case as it progresses. The outcome could influence how regulators and courts treat similar crypto token launches, price manipulation and the use of public-figure names in promotions.

The post Melania Trump and Javier Milei ‘Unwitting Faces’ of $57M Meme Coin Fraud, Suit Says appeared first on Blockonomi.

Source: https://blockonomi.com/melania-trump-and-javier-milei-unwitting-faces-of-57m-meme-coin-fraud-suit-says/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

[Finterest] How do you start saving with Pag-IBIG’s MP2 program?

[Finterest] How do you start saving with Pag-IBIG’s MP2 program?

MP2 may be right for you if you have a conservative risk appetite and an investment horizon of at least 5 years
Share
Rappler2026/03/12 13:05
XRP steadies near $1.38 as Bollinger squeeze hints at breakout before CPI

XRP steadies near $1.38 as Bollinger squeeze hints at breakout before CPI

Markets Share Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
XRP steadies near $1.38 as Bollinger squeeze
Share
Coindesk2026/03/12 13:15
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00