The post Australian Regulator Finally Speaks But Can It Deliver on Crypto Licensing appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ASIC releases new regulatory guide for digital asset providers. Bitcoin and gaming tokens remain outside Australia’s financial product rules. Australia’s financial regulator has released extensive new guidance for digital asset providers, representing a landmark moment for the country’s blockchain industry. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) updated its regulatory guide on Wednesday, mandating cryptocurrency platforms to secure adequate licensing by the middle of the year. Executive industry stakeholders heralded the guidance as an important signal, but noted that challenges await the implementation stage ahead. New Framework Distinguishes Between Digital Asset Categories The new guidance sets clear limits on the different cryptocurrency products, with the Bitcoin expressly not being classified as a financial product under the Australian law. Legal experts examining the new framework also claim that gaming tokens and event-related digital collectibles are not regulated. Expect, however, that stablecoins and tokenized securities will be subject to full licensing, which will make operational obligations for any platforms offering them to customers in Australia. Yield-generating tokens, or all tokenized real estate projects, must be under the stricter parameters of the updated framework as well. To remain operational, crypto service providers have to be members of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority and obtain a license by the June deadline. The regulator has provided a temporary reprieve to the stablecoin distributors, recognizing the difficulty in moving to the proposed legislative framework. Legal experts profile that this mechanism allows for immediate certainty but creates a considerable amount of legislative interpretive burden, i.e. degree of uncertainty, on compliance with regulatory guidance rather than a legislative framework. The industry representatives are pleased with the much-needed clarity, but worry that there are challenges to practical implementation that the industry would face in future. The regulatory body may have resource limitations that cause delays in processing license applications,… The post Australian Regulator Finally Speaks But Can It Deliver on Crypto Licensing appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ASIC releases new regulatory guide for digital asset providers. Bitcoin and gaming tokens remain outside Australia’s financial product rules. Australia’s financial regulator has released extensive new guidance for digital asset providers, representing a landmark moment for the country’s blockchain industry. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) updated its regulatory guide on Wednesday, mandating cryptocurrency platforms to secure adequate licensing by the middle of the year. Executive industry stakeholders heralded the guidance as an important signal, but noted that challenges await the implementation stage ahead. New Framework Distinguishes Between Digital Asset Categories The new guidance sets clear limits on the different cryptocurrency products, with the Bitcoin expressly not being classified as a financial product under the Australian law. Legal experts examining the new framework also claim that gaming tokens and event-related digital collectibles are not regulated. Expect, however, that stablecoins and tokenized securities will be subject to full licensing, which will make operational obligations for any platforms offering them to customers in Australia. Yield-generating tokens, or all tokenized real estate projects, must be under the stricter parameters of the updated framework as well. To remain operational, crypto service providers have to be members of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority and obtain a license by the June deadline. The regulator has provided a temporary reprieve to the stablecoin distributors, recognizing the difficulty in moving to the proposed legislative framework. Legal experts profile that this mechanism allows for immediate certainty but creates a considerable amount of legislative interpretive burden, i.e. degree of uncertainty, on compliance with regulatory guidance rather than a legislative framework. The industry representatives are pleased with the much-needed clarity, but worry that there are challenges to practical implementation that the industry would face in future. The regulatory body may have resource limitations that cause delays in processing license applications,…