The post sam bankman fried Sept. 30 filing: FTX trial impact appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Sam Bankman-Fried argued FTX and Alameda were solvent, citing roughly $25 billion in assets and $16 billion in equity before the Nov 2022 crisis, according to The Block. Does the Sept. 30 filing affect the Sam Bankman Fried trial? The document claims the November run was a liquidity shock — an $8 billion withdrawal demand — and argues assets could have covered outflows. It accuses external counsel and the new CEO, John J. Ray III, of steering FTX into bankruptcy and undervaluing holdings. The filing also alleges consultants and advisers led to asset sales, including about $7 billion of FTT sold, and that settlements and write‑downs reduced recoveries for creditors. How do FTX bankruptcy fees and asset sales shape recoveries? Bankruptcy papers in the public debate cite nearly $1 billion in fees paid to professionals, a point the filing criticises as reducing assets available for customers. The document claims that estate actions produced much lower returns than the parties believed possible. Note: the filing goes further, asserting a hypothetical combined value of about $136 billion if certain assets and equity had been preserved — a contention disputed by trustees and other stakeholders. Could a Sam Bankman-Fried pardon change restitution or proceedings? The Block notes the filing comes amid persistent legal and political manoeuvres: the piece references a Nov 2023 conviction and a reported 25‑year sentence, and states that Bankman‑Fried’s team has pursued clemency, reportedly seeking clemency to Trump. Even if political relief were pursued, criminal clemency would not directly unwind civil bankruptcy actions, asset sales, or creditor distributions now under litigation. What now for FTX stakeholders? In brief, trustees and creditors must reconcile disputed valuations from the Sept. 30 document with realised recoveries and legal costs while litigation proceeds. The contested narrative — from the Nov 2022 crisis to alleged… The post sam bankman fried Sept. 30 filing: FTX trial impact appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Sam Bankman-Fried argued FTX and Alameda were solvent, citing roughly $25 billion in assets and $16 billion in equity before the Nov 2022 crisis, according to The Block. Does the Sept. 30 filing affect the Sam Bankman Fried trial? The document claims the November run was a liquidity shock — an $8 billion withdrawal demand — and argues assets could have covered outflows. It accuses external counsel and the new CEO, John J. Ray III, of steering FTX into bankruptcy and undervaluing holdings. The filing also alleges consultants and advisers led to asset sales, including about $7 billion of FTT sold, and that settlements and write‑downs reduced recoveries for creditors. How do FTX bankruptcy fees and asset sales shape recoveries? Bankruptcy papers in the public debate cite nearly $1 billion in fees paid to professionals, a point the filing criticises as reducing assets available for customers. The document claims that estate actions produced much lower returns than the parties believed possible. Note: the filing goes further, asserting a hypothetical combined value of about $136 billion if certain assets and equity had been preserved — a contention disputed by trustees and other stakeholders. Could a Sam Bankman-Fried pardon change restitution or proceedings? The Block notes the filing comes amid persistent legal and political manoeuvres: the piece references a Nov 2023 conviction and a reported 25‑year sentence, and states that Bankman‑Fried’s team has pursued clemency, reportedly seeking clemency to Trump. Even if political relief were pursued, criminal clemency would not directly unwind civil bankruptcy actions, asset sales, or creditor distributions now under litigation. What now for FTX stakeholders? In brief, trustees and creditors must reconcile disputed valuations from the Sept. 30 document with realised recoveries and legal costs while litigation proceeds. The contested narrative — from the Nov 2022 crisis to alleged…

sam bankman fried Sept. 30 filing: FTX trial impact

Sam Bankman-Fried argued FTX and Alameda were solvent, citing roughly $25 billion in assets and $16 billion in equity before the Nov 2022 crisis, according to The Block.

Does the Sept. 30 filing affect the Sam Bankman Fried trial?

The document claims the November run was a liquidity shock — an $8 billion withdrawal demand — and argues assets could have covered outflows. It accuses external counsel and the new CEO, John J. Ray III, of steering FTX into bankruptcy and undervaluing holdings.

The filing also alleges consultants and advisers led to asset sales, including about $7 billion of FTT sold, and that settlements and write‑downs reduced recoveries for creditors.

How do FTX bankruptcy fees and asset sales shape recoveries?

Bankruptcy papers in the public debate cite nearly $1 billion in fees paid to professionals, a point the filing criticises as reducing assets available for customers. The document claims that estate actions produced much lower returns than the parties believed possible.

Note: the filing goes further, asserting a hypothetical combined value of about $136 billion if certain assets and equity had been preserved — a contention disputed by trustees and other stakeholders.

Could a Sam Bankman-Fried pardon change restitution or proceedings?

The Block notes the filing comes amid persistent legal and political manoeuvres: the piece references a Nov 2023 conviction and a reported 25‑year sentence, and states that Bankman‑Fried’s team has pursued clemency, reportedly seeking clemency to Trump.

Even if political relief were pursued, criminal clemency would not directly unwind civil bankruptcy actions, asset sales, or creditor distributions now under litigation.

What now for FTX stakeholders?

In brief, trustees and creditors must reconcile disputed valuations from the Sept. 30 document with realised recoveries and legal costs while litigation proceeds. The contested narrative — from the Nov 2022 crisis to alleged fee and sale decisions — will shape any remaining distributions and oversight of the estate.

Source: https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2025/10/31/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-solvency-claim/

Market Opportunity
Blockstreet Logo
Blockstreet Price(BLOCK)
$0.012817
$0.012817$0.012817
-5.56%
USD
Blockstreet (BLOCK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Elon Musk and Netanyahu Discuss AI and Tesla Plans In Joint Conference

Elon Musk and Netanyahu Discuss AI and Tesla Plans In Joint Conference

TLDR Elon Musk joined a virtual meeting with Israeli PM Netanyahu to talk AI and transportation technology. Israel aims to lead in AI, using strategies from its
Share
Coincentral2025/12/30 03:05
Elon Musk discusses AI development with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu

Elon Musk discusses AI development with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu

The post Elon Musk discusses AI development with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Musk and Netanyahu discussed
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/30 03:00