The post Here’s Why Tokenized Bank Deposits Don’t Stand a Chance Against Stablecoins appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BlockchainFintech Traditional banks are finally experimenting with blockchain. Yet their latest innovation, tokenized deposits, may be arriving years too late. Financial institutions envision a future where everyday checking balances live on a distributed ledger. But for Omid Malekan, adjunct professor at Columbia Business School, the concept is little more than a digital illusion — one destined to be eclipsed by stablecoins. The Great Banking Copycat Moment In the last decade, crypto projects built what banks never could: instantly transferable digital dollars that actually work. Now, banks want in — but without giving up control. Their idea is to take customer deposits and issue them as blockchain-based tokens, effectively “on-chain bank balances.” Malekan dismisses the model as self-defeating. Tokenized deposits, he argues, are the blockchain equivalent of a private intranet in an era of global internet connectivity — secure, limited, and ultimately obsolete. These instruments would be usable only among customers of the same institution, fenced in by compliance layers like KYC and transaction permissioning. “What use is a token that can’t travel?” he wrote, describing them as digital checking accounts that stop at the bank’s front door. Stablecoins Already Solved the Problem While banks are still building walled gardens, stablecoins have spent years integrating into open networks that now underpin DeFi, cross-border payments, and on-chain commerce. They are interoperable, composable, and transferable without middlemen. Most importantly, they rely on transparent, full-reserve backing — not fractional banking — to ensure stability. That structure, Malekan argues, makes them safer from a risk perspective. Stablecoin issuers must hold equivalent assets in cash or short-term treasuries, giving them a liquidity profile banks can’t match. Tokenized deposits, by contrast, remain exposed to the same lending risk that defines the traditional system. Why Yields Will Decide Everything The real blow, however, could come from returns. As… The post Here’s Why Tokenized Bank Deposits Don’t Stand a Chance Against Stablecoins appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BlockchainFintech Traditional banks are finally experimenting with blockchain. Yet their latest innovation, tokenized deposits, may be arriving years too late. Financial institutions envision a future where everyday checking balances live on a distributed ledger. But for Omid Malekan, adjunct professor at Columbia Business School, the concept is little more than a digital illusion — one destined to be eclipsed by stablecoins. The Great Banking Copycat Moment In the last decade, crypto projects built what banks never could: instantly transferable digital dollars that actually work. Now, banks want in — but without giving up control. Their idea is to take customer deposits and issue them as blockchain-based tokens, effectively “on-chain bank balances.” Malekan dismisses the model as self-defeating. Tokenized deposits, he argues, are the blockchain equivalent of a private intranet in an era of global internet connectivity — secure, limited, and ultimately obsolete. These instruments would be usable only among customers of the same institution, fenced in by compliance layers like KYC and transaction permissioning. “What use is a token that can’t travel?” he wrote, describing them as digital checking accounts that stop at the bank’s front door. Stablecoins Already Solved the Problem While banks are still building walled gardens, stablecoins have spent years integrating into open networks that now underpin DeFi, cross-border payments, and on-chain commerce. They are interoperable, composable, and transferable without middlemen. Most importantly, they rely on transparent, full-reserve backing — not fractional banking — to ensure stability. That structure, Malekan argues, makes them safer from a risk perspective. Stablecoin issuers must hold equivalent assets in cash or short-term treasuries, giving them a liquidity profile banks can’t match. Tokenized deposits, by contrast, remain exposed to the same lending risk that defines the traditional system. Why Yields Will Decide Everything The real blow, however, could come from returns. As…

Here’s Why Tokenized Bank Deposits Don’t Stand a Chance Against Stablecoins

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
BlockchainFintech

Traditional banks are finally experimenting with blockchain. Yet their latest innovation, tokenized deposits, may be arriving years too late.

Financial institutions envision a future where everyday checking balances live on a distributed ledger. But for Omid Malekan, adjunct professor at Columbia Business School, the concept is little more than a digital illusion — one destined to be eclipsed by stablecoins.

The Great Banking Copycat Moment

In the last decade, crypto projects built what banks never could: instantly transferable digital dollars that actually work. Now, banks want in — but without giving up control. Their idea is to take customer deposits and issue them as blockchain-based tokens, effectively “on-chain bank balances.”

Malekan dismisses the model as self-defeating. Tokenized deposits, he argues, are the blockchain equivalent of a private intranet in an era of global internet connectivity — secure, limited, and ultimately obsolete. These instruments would be usable only among customers of the same institution, fenced in by compliance layers like KYC and transaction permissioning.

“What use is a token that can’t travel?” he wrote, describing them as digital checking accounts that stop at the bank’s front door.

Stablecoins Already Solved the Problem

While banks are still building walled gardens, stablecoins have spent years integrating into open networks that now underpin DeFi, cross-border payments, and on-chain commerce. They are interoperable, composable, and transferable without middlemen. Most importantly, they rely on transparent, full-reserve backing — not fractional banking — to ensure stability.

That structure, Malekan argues, makes them safer from a risk perspective. Stablecoin issuers must hold equivalent assets in cash or short-term treasuries, giving them a liquidity profile banks can’t match. Tokenized deposits, by contrast, remain exposed to the same lending risk that defines the traditional system.

Why Yields Will Decide Everything

The real blow, however, could come from returns. As the stablecoin market matures, issuers are finding creative ways to share yields with users — from reward points to staking incentives — even as regulations try to restrict direct interest payouts.

This potential for yield is something banks can’t easily compete with. The average retail savings account in the U.S. or U.K. offers less than 1%, while stablecoin-based products often find indirect methods to return a larger share of Treasury-based earnings to users.

“The banks’ fear is simple,” Malekan explained: “if stablecoins start paying real yield, customers will stop keeping cash in accounts that do nothing.”

A Political Fight, Not a Technological One

The banking lobby has pushed back aggressively, warning that yield-bearing stablecoins could siphon away deposits and threaten financial stability. Critics view it differently. Austin Campbell, a professor at New York University, accused the industry of using regulation as a shield to protect profits, arguing that it’s retail users who lose when competition is suppressed.

The Real-World Asset Boom

Behind this turf war lies a much larger transformation. The tokenization of real-world assets — everything from bonds and real estate to commodities and currencies — is expected to reach $2 trillion by 2028, according to Standard Chartered. Stablecoins are likely to remain the backbone of that ecosystem, serving as the medium through which tokenized assets are traded and settled.

The Verdict

Banks might still succeed in digitizing deposits, but their version of tokenization offers none of the freedom, speed, or interoperability that crypto users expect. In Malekan’s view, the financial sector is trying to retrofit old infrastructure onto new rails — and calling it innovation.

Stablecoins, meanwhile, have already built the roads, vehicles, and traffic rules for the digital economy. What banks are proposing, he suggests, are gated driveways that lead nowhere.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Author

Reporter at Coindoo

With over 6 years of experience in the world of financial markets and cryptocurrencies, Teodor Volkov provides in-depth analyses, up-to-date news, and strategic forecasts for investors and enthusiasts. His professionalism and sense of market trends make the information he shares reliable and valuable for everyone who wants to make informed decisions.

Related stories

Next article

Source: https://coindoo.com/heres-why-tokenized-bank-deposits-dont-stand-a-chance-against-stablecoins/

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.03982
$0.03982$0.03982
-3.23%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

US Jobs Miss Fails to Stop Bitcoin Erasing Its $74,000 Breakout Attempt

US Jobs Miss Fails to Stop Bitcoin Erasing Its $74,000 Breakout Attempt

The post US Jobs Miss Fails to Stop Bitcoin Erasing Its $74,000 Breakout Attempt appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin (BTC) slipped under $70,000 around
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/07 13:50
CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10
SushiSwap (SUSHI) Price Prediction 2026, 2027-2030: Future Outlook, Targets, and Long-Term Forecast

SushiSwap (SUSHI) Price Prediction 2026, 2027-2030: Future Outlook, Targets, and Long-Term Forecast

The post SushiSwap (SUSHI) Price Prediction 2026, 2027-2030: Future Outlook, Targets, and Long-Term Forecast appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Story Highlights
Share
CoinPedia2026/03/07 14:37