The post College Football Playoff Can’t Be Operated By Networks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA – JANUARY 2: CFP, ESPN branding on TV camera before the College Football Playoff Quarterfinal game between the Georgia Bulldogs and the Notre Dame Fighting Irish at the Allstate Sugar Bowl at Caesars Superdome on January 2, 2025 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Photo by CFP/Getty Images) Getty Images Since its inception in 2014, the College Football Playoff has almost courted conflict. From its made-up terms like “game control” and a revolving door of important metrics depending on the teams and conferences in question, the system that was introduced to replace the much-bemoaned Bowl Championship Series has introduced more mystery than ever to the process of determining college football’s best teams. That mystery has only grown as the pool of teams included in the playoff field ballooned last year from four to 12. And one thing has remained relatively consistent: To fairly determine a field of deserving teams, the College Football Playoff cannot be operated by a network. Inherent Conflict Of Interest This isn’t just to pick on ESPN. It’s to point out the fact that any network is bound to be a flawed tournament creator given dwindling linear TV audiences, small pool of nationally-relevant programs and the dizzying ad revenues associated with these games. ESPN, is after all, most interested in creating the best entertainment product, and the one most likely to bring in TV viewers. The same would be true for Fox, NBC or CBS if they were the operators of the event. CBS, to that point, splits rights for the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament with TNT Sports, but does not operate the (larger) event in the same way, with the NCAA Selection Committee ultimately determining participants. So while March Madness is also a TV product – and an immense one – that’s not inherent in… The post College Football Playoff Can’t Be Operated By Networks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA – JANUARY 2: CFP, ESPN branding on TV camera before the College Football Playoff Quarterfinal game between the Georgia Bulldogs and the Notre Dame Fighting Irish at the Allstate Sugar Bowl at Caesars Superdome on January 2, 2025 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Photo by CFP/Getty Images) Getty Images Since its inception in 2014, the College Football Playoff has almost courted conflict. From its made-up terms like “game control” and a revolving door of important metrics depending on the teams and conferences in question, the system that was introduced to replace the much-bemoaned Bowl Championship Series has introduced more mystery than ever to the process of determining college football’s best teams. That mystery has only grown as the pool of teams included in the playoff field ballooned last year from four to 12. And one thing has remained relatively consistent: To fairly determine a field of deserving teams, the College Football Playoff cannot be operated by a network. Inherent Conflict Of Interest This isn’t just to pick on ESPN. It’s to point out the fact that any network is bound to be a flawed tournament creator given dwindling linear TV audiences, small pool of nationally-relevant programs and the dizzying ad revenues associated with these games. ESPN, is after all, most interested in creating the best entertainment product, and the one most likely to bring in TV viewers. The same would be true for Fox, NBC or CBS if they were the operators of the event. CBS, to that point, splits rights for the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament with TNT Sports, but does not operate the (larger) event in the same way, with the NCAA Selection Committee ultimately determining participants. So while March Madness is also a TV product – and an immense one – that’s not inherent in…

College Football Playoff Can’t Be Operated By Networks

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA – JANUARY 2: CFP, ESPN branding on TV camera before the College Football Playoff Quarterfinal game between the Georgia Bulldogs and the Notre Dame Fighting Irish at the Allstate Sugar Bowl at Caesars Superdome on January 2, 2025 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Photo by CFP/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Since its inception in 2014, the College Football Playoff has almost courted conflict.

From its made-up terms like “game control” and a revolving door of important metrics depending on the teams and conferences in question, the system that was introduced to replace the much-bemoaned Bowl Championship Series has introduced more mystery than ever to the process of determining college football’s best teams.

That mystery has only grown as the pool of teams included in the playoff field ballooned last year from four to 12. And one thing has remained relatively consistent: To fairly determine a field of deserving teams, the College Football Playoff cannot be operated by a network.

Inherent Conflict Of Interest

This isn’t just to pick on ESPN. It’s to point out the fact that any network is bound to be a flawed tournament creator given dwindling linear TV audiences, small pool of nationally-relevant programs and the dizzying ad revenues associated with these games.

ESPN, is after all, most interested in creating the best entertainment product, and the one most likely to bring in TV viewers. The same would be true for Fox, NBC or CBS if they were the operators of the event. CBS, to that point, splits rights for the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament with TNT Sports, but does not operate the (larger) event in the same way, with the NCAA Selection Committee ultimately determining participants.

So while March Madness is also a TV product – and an immense one – that’s not inherent in the construction of the field, in part because there are more teams, but also because a network is not determining the participants.

This conversation is particularly relevant the day after the initial College Football Playoff standings were revealed, and a two-loss Notre Dame team controversially sat at No. 10.

ESPN’s release of the first 12-team College Football Playoff field projection for 2025

Credit: ESPN on Twitter

TV Decisions Over On-Field Results

ESPN doesn’t typically have the rights to Notre Dame football games, save when the Fighting Irish play on the road at ACC or SEC teams. Notre Dame also lost to fellow two-loss team Miami, which sits well behind them in the rankings at No. 18.

But the Irish are annually one of TV’s biggest draws. Miami, or one-loss teams like Virginia, Louisville or Georgia Tech (all left out) may not be – though it is notable that Miami has ranked slightly ahead of Notre Dame by average viewers this season according to recent Nielsen data.

Plenty can change here between now and the end of the season. Yet for now, it’s partly a replay of the issues that came up in the final iteration of the four-team College Football Playoff format, when an unbeaten Florida State team was snubbed from the field in favor of (bigger TV draw and SEC champion) Alabama.

That Crimson Tide team was a deserving participant on paper, at 12-1 with a major conference crown. However, FSU went unbeaten, won the ACC and did everything it could possibly do to position itself within the four-team field.

Alabama was left out the following year in favor of less-popular SMU for the final at-large spot in the 12-team playoff, which certainly harms this narrative around TV draw trumping on-field results. However, a fair decision there (giving an 11-2 SMU the nod over 9-3 Alabama) doesn’t remove the fact that ESPN shouldn’t be in the position to be the final arbiter to begin with.

Dating back to the first College Football Playoff, Ohio State made it over both Big 12 co-champions TCU and Baylor in 2014. Central Florida was the only unbeaten team in 2017, yet couldn’t sniff the field.

And as college conferences have consolidated, there’s also a good chance that a future playoff decision could come down to an SEC or ACC team (all rights owned by ESPN) versus a Big Ten (Fox/CBS/NBC) or Big 12 team (ESPN/Fox).

This dynamic has been rearing its head already with things like College Gameday campus selections. Where ESPN once largely opted for the most interesting matchup (in part because it once had at least partial rights to all of the power conferences), the emergence of Fox’s competitive Big Noon Kickoff has led to selections that more closely mirror who has broadcast rights.

Of course, this is all part of life in modern college football. And the network-owned Playoff genie, like the spiraling issues around NIL, isn’t being put back in the bottle anytime soon. But in the long-term, the event risks losing legitimacy without a clearer separation between its media partner(s) and its selection process.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncassillo/2025/11/05/college-football-playoff-cant-be-operated-by-networks/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.008756
$0.008756$0.008756
-3.23%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58
U.S. Coinbase Premium Turns Negative Amid Asian Buying Surge

U.S. Coinbase Premium Turns Negative Amid Asian Buying Surge

U.S. institutional demand falls as Asian markets buy Bitcoin dips, causing negative Coinbase premium.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/23 14:20
How to earn from cloud mining: IeByte’s upgraded auto-cloud mining platform unlocks genuine passive earnings

How to earn from cloud mining: IeByte’s upgraded auto-cloud mining platform unlocks genuine passive earnings

The post How to earn from cloud mining: IeByte’s upgraded auto-cloud mining platform unlocks genuine passive earnings appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. contributor Posted: September 17, 2025 As digital assets continue to reshape global finance, cloud mining has become one of the most effective ways for investors to generate stable passive income. Addressing the growing demand for simplicity, security, and profitability, IeByte has officially upgraded its fully automated cloud mining platform, empowering both beginners and experienced investors to earn Bitcoin, Dogecoin, and other mainstream cryptocurrencies without the need for hardware or technical expertise. Why cloud mining in 2025? Traditional crypto mining requires expensive hardware, high electricity costs, and constant maintenance. In 2025, with blockchain networks becoming more competitive, these barriers have grown even higher. Cloud mining solves this by allowing users to lease professional mining power remotely, eliminating the upfront costs and complexity. IeByte stands at the forefront of this transformation, offering investors a transparent and seamless path to daily earnings. IeByte’s upgraded auto-cloud mining platform With its latest upgrade, IeByte introduces: Full Automation: Mining contracts can be activated in just one click, with all processes handled by IeByte’s servers. Enhanced Security: Bank-grade encryption, cold wallets, and real-time monitoring protect every transaction. Scalable Options: From starter packages to high-level investment contracts, investors can choose the plan that matches their goals. Global Reach: Already trusted by users in over 100 countries. Mining contracts for 2025 IeByte offers a wide range of contracts tailored for every investor level. From entry-level plans with daily returns to premium high-yield packages, the platform ensures maximum accessibility. Contract Type Duration Price Daily Reward Total Earnings (Principal + Profit) Starter Contract 1 Day $200 $6 $200 + $6 + $10 bonus Bronze Basic Contract 2 Days $500 $13.5 $500 + $27 Bronze Basic Contract 3 Days $1,200 $36 $1,200 + $108 Silver Advanced Contract 1 Day $5,000 $175 $5,000 + $175 Silver Advanced Contract 2 Days $8,000 $320 $8,000 + $640 Silver…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:48