'Vibe coding' captures the care free, improvisational side of programming; Write what feels good, and see where it goes. Technical debt captures the inevitable consequences.'Vibe coding' captures the care free, improvisational side of programming; Write what feels good, and see where it goes. Technical debt captures the inevitable consequences.

'Vibe Coding' Is Now In The Collins Dictionary - But What About 'Technical Debt'?

The addition of 'Vibe Coding' to the Collins Dictionary made headlines recently. But somewhat poetically, there is no entry for the consequences that can easily result from the celebrated praxis.

\ As an increasingly geriatric coder, my understanding gleaned from watching 'The YouTube' is that Vibe coding seems to involve writing software:

  • without a clear design
  • without documentation
  • without understanding of the code
  • without consideration for edge cases
  • without consideration for longevity
  • without regard for efficiency

\ None of these things inherently indicate technical debt…but they do make it considerably more probable. And yet, technical debt mysteriously has no entry in the Collins dictionary.

\ One term has earned linguistic prestige; the other, despite being older, more widely used, and infinitely more expensive, remains unacknowledged.

\ It is almost as if the hype is more relevant than the reality.

\ And in fairness, maybe we are entering a new age, where these things don't matter as vibe-coded work can just be replaced with more vibe-coded work, and churn becomes the new norm.

\ I have no doubt that vibe coding can hold great value, and I have no doubt it will change the world. I also have no doubt the outcome will be as old as every quick fix that became someone else's long-term problem…even if the dictionary fails to name it

Market Opportunity
Nowchain Logo
Nowchain Price(NOW)
$0.00073
$0.00073$0.00073
+2.81%
USD
Nowchain (NOW) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group has revealed a multi-year partnership with Ripple to integrate traditional finance with digital asset markets. As part of the agreement, LMAX will introduce
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/16 23:00
Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

A gripping tale of deception has captured the media’s spotlight, especially in foreign outlets, centering on a cryptocurrency fraud case from Denver, Colorado. Eli Regalado, a pastor, alongside his wife Kaitlyn, was convicted, but what makes this case particularly intriguing is their unconventional defense.Continue Reading:Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:38