Travis Hill has advanced toward becoming the permanent FDIC chair after a narrow vote by the Senate Banking Committee.Travis Hill has advanced toward becoming the permanent FDIC chair after a narrow vote by the Senate Banking Committee.

Senate Banking Committee approves Travis Hill’s FDIC nomination 13‑11, sending it to the full Senate

The nomination of Travis Hill to lead the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) moved forward as the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs voted 13-11 along party lines to advance his confirmation to the full Senate.

Hill currently holds the role of acting chairman of the agency, and his elevation comes amid significant policy changes and an internal reassessment at the FDIC. He needs a vote by the full Senate to be confirmed in the position.

To Republicans, he is an advocate for a regulator who will update bank oversight and allow new financial technologies to flourish. For Democrats, he would raise questions about eroding safeguards that protect depositors and financial stability.

Hill is leading the shift in crypto policies

The acting FDIC chair is most widely regarded as one of today’s most pro-crypto financial regulators in the federal government. And he has steered the FDIC over the past year to be more favorable toward digital assets on the basis that U.S. banks should have the opportunity to innovate without too many barriers. 

Under Hill’s leadership, the FDIC has begun rolling back prior guidance that discouraged banks from engaging in crypto-related activities unless they received special approval.

Hill has repeatedly argued that “reputational risk” should not be used as a primary regulatory tool, calling it vague and overly broad. In his view, reputational risk is too subjective to apply fairly across institutions. Instead, he says banks should be evaluated on how they manage actual financial, operational, and compliance risks — not on speculative concerns about public perception.

Some in the digital assets industry have hailed such a shift, arguing that they have been excluded from critical banking services. Hill’s stance indicates a more permissive FDIC, one that’s willing to allow trial and error on blockchain, custody services, and reasonable crypto channeling.

He has also led a transparency push and issued internal supervisory documents that demonstrate how regulators approached banks that worked with crypto firms. In that case, Hill argues, openness improves trust — and provides institutions with clarity in expectation.  

Lawmakers press Hill on oversight and culture

While Hill enjoys strong Republican support, his nomination has been a subject of great controversy. Senators have pointed out unresolved cultural and structural issues within the FDIC that have revealed years of harassment, bullying, and unsafe workplace practices, after an independent investigation reported on the matter. 

At confirmation hearings, Hill faced harsh questions about how he’s solving these problems, what he is doing about them, and what reforms have been implemented since the scandal was brought to light through difficult conversations. There was considerable frustration among several lawmakers who were confused by the delays in receiving updates from Hill and some members of Congress. 

One senator publicly warned Hill that a vote for him was contingent upon full transparency. Hill has maintained that he is committed to repairing the FDIC’s culture, holding the agency accountable, and instilling trust in FDIC staff. More broadly, he has proposed modernizing supervision, simplifying regulatory procedures, and enhancing the FDIC’s capacity to manage troubled banks. 

The same goes for regional bankers who have rallied behind him, saying they feel he can address their needs and that a more balanced regulatory approach, one that does not impose unnecessary burdens, will avoid further problems. 

With committee approval now in place, Hill’s nomination is in the full Senate. If confirmed, he would reshape the FDIC’s approach to innovation and risk-taking, as well as the relationship between banks and the cryptocurrency economy. His reign would likely be one of the sharpest new directions the FDIC has taken in years — one that will expand opportunities for digital-asset companies while also testing how regulators can balance innovation and stability.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Russia’s Central Bank Prepares Crackdown on Crypto in New 2026–2028 Strategy

Russia’s Central Bank Prepares Crackdown on Crypto in New 2026–2028 Strategy

The Central Bank of Russia’s long-term strategy for 2026 to 2028 paints a picture of growing concern. The document, prepared […] The post Russia’s Central Bank Prepares Crackdown on Crypto in New 2026–2028 Strategy appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 02:30
Japanese Yen rises on safe-haven demand and intervention concerns

Japanese Yen rises on safe-haven demand and intervention concerns

The post Japanese Yen rises on safe-haven demand and intervention concerns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Japanese Yen (JPY) attracts some buyers at the
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/22 11:49
Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

The post Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto assets send conflicting signals ahead of the Federal Reserve’s September rate decision. On-chain data reveals a clear decrease in Bitcoin and Ethereum flowing into centralized exchanges, but a sharp increase in altcoin inflows. The findings come from a Tuesday report by CryptoQuant, an on-chain data platform. The firm’s data shows a stark divergence in coin volume, which has been observed in movements onto centralized exchanges over the past few weeks. Bitcoin and Ethereum Inflows Drop to Multi-Month Lows Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin has seen a dramatic drop in exchange inflows, with the 7-day moving average plummeting to 25,000 BTC, its lowest level in over a year. The average deposit per transaction has fallen to 0.57 BTC as of September. This suggests that smaller retail investors, rather than large-scale whales, are responsible for the recent cash-outs. Ethereum is showing a similar trend, with its daily exchange inflows decreasing to a two-month low. CryptoQuant reported that the 7-day moving average for ETH deposits on exchanges is around 783,000 ETH, the lowest in two months. Other Altcoins See Renewed Selling Pressure In contrast, other altcoin deposit activity on exchanges has surged. The number of altcoin deposit transactions on centralized exchanges was quite steady in May and June of this year, maintaining a 7-day moving average of about 20,000 to 30,000. Recently, however, that figure has jumped to 55,000 transactions. Altcoins: Exchange Inflow Transaction Count. Source: CryptoQuant CryptoQuant projects that altcoins, given their increased inflow activity, could face relatively higher selling pressure compared to BTC and ETH. Meanwhile, the balance of stablecoins on exchanges—a key indicator of potential buying pressure—has increased significantly. The report notes that the exchange USDT balance, around $273 million in April, grew to $379 million by August 31, marking a new yearly high. CryptoQuant interprets this surge as a reflection of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:01