The post Khabib’s $4.4M NFT sale sparks feud as McGregor slams ‘crypto scam’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key takeaways What triggered the latest clash between McGregor and Khabib?  McGregor accused Khabib’s Papakha NFT project of being a scam after promotional posts were deleted. What broader issue does this feud highlight in the crypto space?  It underscores rising concerns over celebrity accountability and growing regulatory scrutiny of NFT projects. Conor McGregor and Khabib Nurmagomedov are clashing once again, this time, not in the cage but over cryptocurrency. McGregor calls out Khabib On the 26th of November, McGregor accused the retired champion of running a scam using digital collectibles. The controversy stems from Khabib’s new “Papakha” NFTs, digital versions of his iconic hat, sold via Telegram. Last weekend, Nurmagomedov promoted the collection, which honored the traditional headpiece linked to his undefeated UFC career. The drop featured 29,000 NFTs and reportedly generated over $4.4 million in just 25 hours. Yet, soon after the sale ended, the promotional posts were deleted, catching McGregor’s eye and prompting a swift attack. How did this controversy start? McGregor accused Khabib of using Dagestani culture and his late father’s name to take money from fans before wiping the evidence. He launched his attack on X (formerly Twitter), though the post has since been deleted, writing: “There is just no way good guy Khabib used his late father’s name, as well as Dagestan’s culture, to scam his fans and fire sell a bunch of digital NFT’s online and then delete all of the content after they were sold, leaving his fans robbed of their money?” Expressing further added, “There is just no way good guy do this. Father’s plan has now become Father’s scam. Very sad.” Source: X Khabib swiftly fired back, branding McGregor “an absolute liar.” He defended the NFT project as a heartfelt tribute to his late father, Abdulmanap Nurmagomedov, and a digital keepsake honoring… The post Khabib’s $4.4M NFT sale sparks feud as McGregor slams ‘crypto scam’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key takeaways What triggered the latest clash between McGregor and Khabib?  McGregor accused Khabib’s Papakha NFT project of being a scam after promotional posts were deleted. What broader issue does this feud highlight in the crypto space?  It underscores rising concerns over celebrity accountability and growing regulatory scrutiny of NFT projects. Conor McGregor and Khabib Nurmagomedov are clashing once again, this time, not in the cage but over cryptocurrency. McGregor calls out Khabib On the 26th of November, McGregor accused the retired champion of running a scam using digital collectibles. The controversy stems from Khabib’s new “Papakha” NFTs, digital versions of his iconic hat, sold via Telegram. Last weekend, Nurmagomedov promoted the collection, which honored the traditional headpiece linked to his undefeated UFC career. The drop featured 29,000 NFTs and reportedly generated over $4.4 million in just 25 hours. Yet, soon after the sale ended, the promotional posts were deleted, catching McGregor’s eye and prompting a swift attack. How did this controversy start? McGregor accused Khabib of using Dagestani culture and his late father’s name to take money from fans before wiping the evidence. He launched his attack on X (formerly Twitter), though the post has since been deleted, writing: “There is just no way good guy Khabib used his late father’s name, as well as Dagestan’s culture, to scam his fans and fire sell a bunch of digital NFT’s online and then delete all of the content after they were sold, leaving his fans robbed of their money?” Expressing further added, “There is just no way good guy do this. Father’s plan has now become Father’s scam. Very sad.” Source: X Khabib swiftly fired back, branding McGregor “an absolute liar.” He defended the NFT project as a heartfelt tribute to his late father, Abdulmanap Nurmagomedov, and a digital keepsake honoring…

Khabib’s $4.4M NFT sale sparks feud as McGregor slams ‘crypto scam’

Key takeaways

What triggered the latest clash between McGregor and Khabib? 

McGregor accused Khabib’s Papakha NFT project of being a scam after promotional posts were deleted.

What broader issue does this feud highlight in the crypto space? 

It underscores rising concerns over celebrity accountability and growing regulatory scrutiny of NFT projects.


Conor McGregor and Khabib Nurmagomedov are clashing once again, this time, not in the cage but over cryptocurrency.

McGregor calls out Khabib

On the 26th of November, McGregor accused the retired champion of running a scam using digital collectibles.

The controversy stems from Khabib’s new “Papakha” NFTs, digital versions of his iconic hat, sold via Telegram. Last weekend, Nurmagomedov promoted the collection, which honored the traditional headpiece linked to his undefeated UFC career.

The drop featured 29,000 NFTs and reportedly generated over $4.4 million in just 25 hours. Yet, soon after the sale ended, the promotional posts were deleted, catching McGregor’s eye and prompting a swift attack.

How did this controversy start?

McGregor accused Khabib of using Dagestani culture and his late father’s name to take money from fans before wiping the evidence.

He launched his attack on X (formerly Twitter), though the post has since been deleted, writing:

Expressing further added,

Source: X

Khabib swiftly fired back, branding McGregor “an absolute liar.”

He defended the NFT project as a heartfelt tribute to his late father, Abdulmanap Nurmagomedov, and a digital keepsake honoring Dagestani tradition, insisting it was never intended as a speculative cash-grab.

ZachXBT turned the tables

However, the debate took an interesting turn when on-chain investigator ZachXBT joined in. The investigator didn’t defend Khabib, but instead targeted McGregor’s own history.

ZachXBT reposted McGregor’s accusations alongside details of the Irishman’s own 2022 NFT project, “McGregor Realm,” which also received heavy promotion before quietly disappearing similarly.

The investigator simply quoted, before later deleting the post,

This back-and-forth instantly revived one of MMA’s most bitter rivalries, while also exposing the broader challenge of celebrity accountability in the crypto world.

This six-year-old feud has evolved into a digital war, even though one man retired undefeated, and the other is plotting a comeback after a career-halting injury.

What’s more?

This controversy comes as the global crypto market cap is recovering, regaining the $3.12 trillion mark, at press time, boosted by Bitcoin’s price surge above $90,000.

However, the celebrity dispute reflects a growing regulatory risk.

In the UK, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) recently arrested two people after the £21 million collapse of Basis Markets, a crypto-investment scheme built around NFTs.

Investigators report that promoters promised investors algorithmic trading returns through NFT-based “membership access,” but diverted the funds instead.

All these events confirm that NFTs are exiting their regulatory “grey zone.”

Now, whether this was simply a failed celebrity NFT launch or something far more coordinated, only time will tell.

Next: Branding crisis? Polygon mulls returning to its former ‘MATIC’ name

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/khabibs-4-4m-nft-sale-sparks-feud-as-mcgregor-slams-crypto-scam/

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.02025
$0.02025$0.02025
+3.00%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Bitcoin ETFs Surge with 20,685 BTC Inflows, Marking Strongest Week

Bitcoin ETFs Surge with 20,685 BTC Inflows, Marking Strongest Week

TLDR Bitcoin ETFs recorded their strongest weekly inflows since July, reaching 20,685 BTC. U.S. Bitcoin ETFs contributed nearly 97% of the total inflows last week. The surge in Bitcoin ETF inflows pushed holdings to a new high of 1.32 million BTC. Fidelity’s FBTC product accounted for 36% of the total inflows, marking an 18-month high. [...] The post Bitcoin ETFs Surge with 20,685 BTC Inflows, Marking Strongest Week appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 02:30
CME Unleashing XRP Options After $16B Futures Rally Signals Strong Institutional Demand

CME Unleashing XRP Options After $16B Futures Rally Signals Strong Institutional Demand

The post CME Unleashing XRP Options After $16B Futures Rally Signals Strong Institutional Demand appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Institutional crypto activity is accelerating as CME gears up to launch XRP and solana options with daily expirations in October, adding to growing adoption in the futures market. XRP Options Set to Launch on CME in October With Daily Expirations CME Group, the world’s largest derivatives marketplace, announced on Sept. 17 that it will introduce […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/cme-unleashing-xrp-options-after-16b-futures-rally-signals-strong-institutional-demand/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:24