The post Grand Jury Declines Indictment Against Letitia James appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline An indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James was declined by a grand jury Thursday in a mortgage fraud case against her, marking the second Trump administration-led indictment James has avoided within the last two weeks. New York Attorney General Letitia James, speaks outside the United States District Court on Oct. 24 in Norfolk, Virginia. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Key Facts The indictment was declined by a grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia. The Justice Department sought to indict James after its first indictment against James was thrown out in November, as U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who signed the indictment, was not validly appointed. Prosecutors can still seek a third indictment against James, who has denied wrongdoing. What We Don’t Know: If the DOJ will also try to reindict former FBI Director James Comey, whose charges for allegedly lying to Congress were also thrown out due to Halligan’s appointment being invalid. While bringing charges against James was more straightforward, Comey’s case is more complicated, as the statute of limitations for his comments to Congress expired in September. Federal law does allow prosecutors to bring new charges within six months of charges being dismissed despite the statute of limitations—or 60 days after any appeals process ends—but it’s unclear if that applies here. Currie suggested in a footnote to her ruling that since the government’s indictment against Comey was never valid in the first place, since Halligan wasn’t a valid prosecutor, then the six-month rule doesn’t apply, and the charges can’t be brought again. The judge’s comments aren’t binding, however, so the Trump administration could still try to bring charges again and see how it plays out in court. Read More Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/04/new-york-attorney-general-letitia-james-avoids-new-indictment-from-trump-administration/The post Grand Jury Declines Indictment Against Letitia James appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline An indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James was declined by a grand jury Thursday in a mortgage fraud case against her, marking the second Trump administration-led indictment James has avoided within the last two weeks. New York Attorney General Letitia James, speaks outside the United States District Court on Oct. 24 in Norfolk, Virginia. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Key Facts The indictment was declined by a grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia. The Justice Department sought to indict James after its first indictment against James was thrown out in November, as U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who signed the indictment, was not validly appointed. Prosecutors can still seek a third indictment against James, who has denied wrongdoing. What We Don’t Know: If the DOJ will also try to reindict former FBI Director James Comey, whose charges for allegedly lying to Congress were also thrown out due to Halligan’s appointment being invalid. While bringing charges against James was more straightforward, Comey’s case is more complicated, as the statute of limitations for his comments to Congress expired in September. Federal law does allow prosecutors to bring new charges within six months of charges being dismissed despite the statute of limitations—or 60 days after any appeals process ends—but it’s unclear if that applies here. Currie suggested in a footnote to her ruling that since the government’s indictment against Comey was never valid in the first place, since Halligan wasn’t a valid prosecutor, then the six-month rule doesn’t apply, and the charges can’t be brought again. The judge’s comments aren’t binding, however, so the Trump administration could still try to bring charges again and see how it plays out in court. Read More Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/04/new-york-attorney-general-letitia-james-avoids-new-indictment-from-trump-administration/

Grand Jury Declines Indictment Against Letitia James

2025/12/05 07:45

Topline

An indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James was declined by a grand jury Thursday in a mortgage fraud case against her, marking the second Trump administration-led indictment James has avoided within the last two weeks.

New York Attorney General Letitia James, speaks outside the United States District Court on Oct. 24 in Norfolk, Virginia.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Key Facts

The indictment was declined by a grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia.

The Justice Department sought to indict James after its first indictment against James was thrown out in November, as U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who signed the indictment, was not validly appointed.

Prosecutors can still seek a third indictment against James, who has denied wrongdoing.

What We Don’t Know:

If the DOJ will also try to reindict former FBI Director James Comey, whose charges for allegedly lying to Congress were also thrown out due to Halligan’s appointment being invalid. While bringing charges against James was more straightforward, Comey’s case is more complicated, as the statute of limitations for his comments to Congress expired in September. Federal law does allow prosecutors to bring new charges within six months of charges being dismissed despite the statute of limitations—or 60 days after any appeals process ends—but it’s unclear if that applies here. Currie suggested in a footnote to her ruling that since the government’s indictment against Comey was never valid in the first place, since Halligan wasn’t a valid prosecutor, then the six-month rule doesn’t apply, and the charges can’t be brought again. The judge’s comments aren’t binding, however, so the Trump administration could still try to bring charges again and see how it plays out in court.

Read More

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/04/new-york-attorney-general-letitia-james-avoids-new-indictment-from-trump-administration/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

QQQ short term cycle nearing end; pullback likely to attract buyers [Video]

QQQ short term cycle nearing end; pullback likely to attract buyers [Video]

The post QQQ short term cycle nearing end; pullback likely to attract buyers [Video] appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The short-term Elliott Wave outlook for the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) indicates that the cycle from the April 2025 low remains active. Wave (4) of the ongoing impulse concluded at 580.27, and the ETF has since resumed its upward trajectory. To confirm continuation, price must break above the prior wave (3) peak recorded on 30 October at 638.41. The rally from the 21 November wave (4) low has matured and is expected to complete soon, reflecting the natural rhythm of the Elliott Wave sequence. The advance from wave (4) has unfolded as a five-wave impulse. Within this structure, wave ((i)) ended at 586.25, followed by a corrective pullback in wave ((ii)) that terminated at 580.36. From there, the ETF nested higher. Wave (i) of the next sequence ended at 596.98, while wave (ii) pulled back to 589.44. Momentum carried wave (iii) to 606.76, before wave (iv) corrected to 597.32. The final leg, wave (v), reached 619.51, completing wave ((iii)) at a higher degree. A subsequent pullback in wave ((iv)) ended at 612.13. Looking ahead, wave ((v)) of 1 is expected to finish soon. Afterward, a corrective wave 2 should unfold, addressing the cycle from the 21 November low before the ETF resumes higher. In the near term, as long as the pivot at 580.27 remains intact, dips are anticipated to find support in a 3, 7, or 11 swing sequence, reinforcing prospects for further upside. Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) 30-minute Elliott Wave chart from 12.5.2025 Nasdaq 100 ETF Elliott Wave [Video] Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/qqq-short-term-cycle-nearing-end-pullback-likely-to-attract-buyers-video-202512050323
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/05 11:40