President Marcos also says an arrest warrant vs Sarah Discaya will come out soonPresident Marcos also says an arrest warrant vs Sarah Discaya will come out soon

Court of Appeals issues freeze order vs Silverwolves, Yaps in House

2025/12/09 07:36

MANILA, Philippines — President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. on Tuesday, December 9, announced that the personal accounts and assets of one-time House appropriations chairperson Benguet Representative Eric Yap were among those ordered frozen by the Court of Appeals (CA) in relation to anomalous flood control projects being probed by his administration. 

In a recorded message released early December 9, Marcos said the CA’s freeze order covers bank accounts, assets, and aircraft connected to Silverwolves Construction Corporation at Sky Yard Aviation Corporation, as well as the personnal accounts of Yap and his brother Edvic, who represents ACT-CIS in the House. 

Marcos, in his latest report to the public, said over P16 billion in projects were awarded to Silverwolves between 2022 to 2025, many of them related to the Department of Public Works and Highway’s flood control efforts. 

The President said the following were ordered frozen by the CA: 

  • 280 bank accounts 
  • 22 insurance policies 
  • Three securities accounts 
  • 8 aircraft, including airplanes and helicopters related to Sky Yard Aviation

Marcos also annoucned he expects an arrest warrant to be issued against controversial contractor Sarah Discaya this week. “Hindi na rin magtatagal ang pag-aresto sa kanya (Her arrest will happen soon thereafter),” said Marcos. 

Silverwolves is named in a bid-rigging and criminal complaints filed by the DPWH. Eric Yap, who once represented ACT-CIS in Congress, was chairperson of the powerful appropriations committee beginning 2020 until the end of the 18th Congress.

The President had took it upon himself to announce — usually through recorded video messages — updated related to the investigation of anomalous flood control projects in the Philippines. It’s a corruption scandal — triggered by Marcos himself in July 2025 — that’s reached most corners of government, including those close to Malacañang and the President himself.  

Kailangan natin ang mga freeze order na ito para hindi maibenta ang mga ari-arian at para maibalik natin sa ating mga kababayan ang bawat pisong pinaghihinalaang ninakaw (We need these freeze orders to stop the sale of these assets and to ensure that each peso believed to be stolen from the Filipino people is returned),” said Marcos, son and namesake of a late dictator whose reign was characterized by the looting of public coffers. 

Magpapatuloy ang imbestigasyon. Magpapatuloy ang pagpapanagot. At sisiguraduhin ng pamahalaan na ang pera ng bayan ay maibabalik sa taumbayan (The investigation will continue. Accountability will continue. And we will make sure that the nation’s funds will be returned to the Filipino),” he added. 

Yet Marcos has not addressed, directly or specifically, allegations made against those closest to him — including a new iteration of pork that benefited his son Majority Leader Sandro Marcos and cousin former House speaker Martin Romualdez, the most.

Malacañang has made blanket denials of corruption allegations made against Marcos and his relatives, particularly those that come from former ally and one-time appropriations chairperson Zaldy Co, who has been releasing video-recorded exposes from outside the Philippines.

Marcos has also yet to directly address the ties a longtime aide of his has to a newly-created construction firm that bagged over P250 million in contracts in his hometown of Ilocos Norte. Jojo Cadiz, appointed justice undersecretary by Marcos in 2022, has since stepped down. – Rappler.com 

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

The post OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has confirmed that nine major U.S. banks engaged in debanking practices from 2020 to 2023, restricting access for digital asset firms and other sectors. This marks the first official acknowledgment of these policies, which limited services based on customer types, affecting crypto businesses significantly. OCC report highlights inappropriate distinctions by banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, targeting crypto and high-risk sectors. Nine banks reviewed showed similar policies restricting customer access without objective risk assessments. Impacted industries include digital asset firms, with potential referrals to the Attorney General for unlawful practices. Discover how major U.S. banks’ debanking policies hit crypto firms hard, per OCC’s 2025 report. Learn the implications for digital assets and what regulators are doing next—stay informed on banking risks today! What Are the OCC’s Findings on Banks Debanking Crypto Firms? Banks debanking crypto firms involves major financial institutions limiting or denying services to digital asset businesses based on perceived risks, as detailed in a recent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) report. From 2020 to 2023, nine of the largest U.S. banks implemented policies that required escalated reviews or outright restrictions for certain customers, including those in the crypto sector. This practice, now publicly confirmed, underscores ongoing tensions between traditional banking and emerging digital asset industries. How Did These Debanking Practices Affect Digital Asset Companies? The OCC’s six-page report, released on Wednesday, revealed that institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp, Capital One, PNC Financial Services Group, Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal made distinctions among customers that were deemed inappropriate. For digital asset firms, this meant heightened scrutiny or complete denial of banking services, hindering operations in an already volatile market. The regulator noted that these policies spanned…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 11:01