The post DATS can’t survive as a treasury-only play appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. Digital asset treasury strategies, or DATS, broke crypto wide open for retail investors. Now they’re about to break themselves if they don’t evolve fast. The party’s over for DATS 1.0. Summary DATS 1.0 has collapsed: Pure treasury companies now trade at or below NAV as the market treats passive crypto holdings like commodity exposure, not innovation. Passive yields aren’t a business: Staking-only models are being repriced toward zero premium, while leaders are using digital assets as working capital to power real revenue — from AI compute to payments and market-making. DATS 2.0 favors operators: Winners will be purpose-built companies turning treasuries into operating advantages; the rest will bleed out as investors prioritize cash-flow generation over Bitcoin hoarding. Those early movers who loaded corporate treasuries with Bitcoin (BTC) and called it innovation? They’re trading at or below net asset value now. The market has spoken. Sitting on digital assets and collecting staking yields isn’t a business model anymore. It’s a savings account with extra steps. Don’t misunderstand — the first wave of DATS companies accomplished something remarkable. They gave retirement accounts access to crypto yields. They proved corporate Bitcoin holdings weren’t insane. They turned a fringe idea into a $100 billion reality across public companies. And Strategy was to walk so everyone else could run. But that race is over. The winners have been crowned. And the rest? They’re discovering what happens when everyone copies the same playbook. The honeymoon phase just ended Remember when simply announcing a Bitcoin treasury strategy would pump a stock 50 percent? Those days are gone. The novelty premium has evaporated. Today’s market sees through the veneer. Most DATS companies are just holding… The post DATS can’t survive as a treasury-only play appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. Digital asset treasury strategies, or DATS, broke crypto wide open for retail investors. Now they’re about to break themselves if they don’t evolve fast. The party’s over for DATS 1.0. Summary DATS 1.0 has collapsed: Pure treasury companies now trade at or below NAV as the market treats passive crypto holdings like commodity exposure, not innovation. Passive yields aren’t a business: Staking-only models are being repriced toward zero premium, while leaders are using digital assets as working capital to power real revenue — from AI compute to payments and market-making. DATS 2.0 favors operators: Winners will be purpose-built companies turning treasuries into operating advantages; the rest will bleed out as investors prioritize cash-flow generation over Bitcoin hoarding. Those early movers who loaded corporate treasuries with Bitcoin (BTC) and called it innovation? They’re trading at or below net asset value now. The market has spoken. Sitting on digital assets and collecting staking yields isn’t a business model anymore. It’s a savings account with extra steps. Don’t misunderstand — the first wave of DATS companies accomplished something remarkable. They gave retirement accounts access to crypto yields. They proved corporate Bitcoin holdings weren’t insane. They turned a fringe idea into a $100 billion reality across public companies. And Strategy was to walk so everyone else could run. But that race is over. The winners have been crowned. And the rest? They’re discovering what happens when everyone copies the same playbook. The honeymoon phase just ended Remember when simply announcing a Bitcoin treasury strategy would pump a stock 50 percent? Those days are gone. The novelty premium has evaporated. Today’s market sees through the veneer. Most DATS companies are just holding…

DATS can’t survive as a treasury-only play

2025/12/09 21:59

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

Digital asset treasury strategies, or DATS, broke crypto wide open for retail investors. Now they’re about to break themselves if they don’t evolve fast. The party’s over for DATS 1.0.

Summary

  • DATS 1.0 has collapsed: Pure treasury companies now trade at or below NAV as the market treats passive crypto holdings like commodity exposure, not innovation.
  • Passive yields aren’t a business: Staking-only models are being repriced toward zero premium, while leaders are using digital assets as working capital to power real revenue — from AI compute to payments and market-making.
  • DATS 2.0 favors operators: Winners will be purpose-built companies turning treasuries into operating advantages; the rest will bleed out as investors prioritize cash-flow generation over Bitcoin hoarding.

Those early movers who loaded corporate treasuries with Bitcoin (BTC) and called it innovation? They’re trading at or below net asset value now. The market has spoken. Sitting on digital assets and collecting staking yields isn’t a business model anymore. It’s a savings account with extra steps.

Don’t misunderstand — the first wave of DATS companies accomplished something remarkable. They gave retirement accounts access to crypto yields. They proved corporate Bitcoin holdings weren’t insane. They turned a fringe idea into a $100 billion reality across public companies. And Strategy was to walk so everyone else could run.

But that race is over. The winners have been crowned. And the rest? They’re discovering what happens when everyone copies the same playbook.

The honeymoon phase just ended

Remember when simply announcing a Bitcoin treasury strategy would pump a stock 50 percent? Those days are gone. The novelty premium has evaporated. Today’s market sees through the veneer. Most DATS companies are just holding companies with fancy websites.

The compression is brutal. Some DATS stocks trade below their net asset value, meaning the market values the company less than the Bitcoin it holds. That’s the market’s way of saying your “strategy” isn’t worth anything. You’re a worse version of an ETF.

Saturation killed the buzz. When one company holds Bitcoin, it’s pioneering. When fifty do, it’s a commodity play. The market doesn’t reward commodities with premium valuations. It grinds them down to their raw material value.

The math is unforgiving. Staking yields of 5-7% sound impressive until you realize that’s your only revenue stream. No products. No services. No competitive moat. Just a prayer that the number goes up forever.

The uncomfortable truth about passive strategies

Let’s address the elephant in the room. Is this even a business?

A real business creates value. It solves problems. It generates revenue from operations, not just from sitting on appreciating assets. Most DATS companies fail this basic test. They’re leveraged bets masquerading as operating companies.

The smartest players already see this. They’re pivoting hard. Not away from digital assets — but toward actually using them to build something real. The treasury becomes fuel for operations, not the operation itself.

Take what’s happening with companies integrating blockchain for real-world AI compute services. They’re using digital asset allocations to power decentralized computing networks. Treasury assets fund GPU purchases. Those GPUs generate revenue from AI workloads. The digital assets aren’t just sitting there — they’re working capital.

Or look at firms building payment infrastructure on their treasury foundation. They’re not just holding stablecoins. They’re moving billions in cross-border payments, taking fees on every transaction. The treasury enables the business. The business justifies the valuation.

The blueprint for DATS 2.0

The survivors won’t be the companies with the biggest Bitcoin stash. They’ll be the ones who figure out how to turn that stash into an operating advantage.

Here’s what separates the next generation from the walking dead:

Operating revenue beats passive yield. Every time. The market pays for growth, not for savings accounts. Companies generating real revenue from blockchain operations will trade at tech multiples. Pure treasuries will trade at a discount-to-NAV.

Built with intent from day one. The most promising players aren’t retrofitting treasury strategies onto dying businesses. They’re purpose-built entities with experienced teams who understand both traditional finance and blockchain operations. They launch with a clear path to operational revenue, not vague promises about “exploring opportunities.”

Digital assets as working capital, not museum pieces. Bitcoin isn’t there to admire. It’s collateral for DeFi operations. It’s liquidity for market-making. It’s fuel for validator nodes. It’s working 24/7, not sitting in cold storage hoping for appreciation.

The anonymous case study making rounds in boardrooms? A healthcare data company that pivoted from pure DATS to using its treasury to fund decentralized compute infrastructure. Six months later, they’re generating seven figures monthly from GPU rental revenue while still capturing crypto upside. That’s the model.

The clock is ticking

This evolution isn’t optional. The market is already repricing pure-play DATS companies toward zero premium. Traditional finance is launching competitive products that offer similar exposure without the corporate overhead. Why own a DATS stock when you can own a Bitcoin ETF directly?

The answer better not be “staking yields.” That’s not enough anymore.

The companies that survive will be the ones that understand that DATS was never the destination. It was the on-ramp. The real opportunity lies in building operating businesses that leverage digital assets for competitive advantage, not just balance sheet decoration.

We’re watching natural selection in real-time. The pure treasuries will slowly bleed out, trading at ever-deeper discounts until they’re forced to liquidate or pivot. The operating companies will absorb their market share and emerge as the new leaders of corporate crypto adoption.

The first wave of DATS opened the door. It proved corporate crypto wasn’t crazy. It democratized access. It changed the conversation. All critical achievements.

But that chapter is closing. The next one demands more than passive accumulation. It demands execution, innovation, and real business models. The companies that understand this shift are already building. The ones that don’t? They’re already dead. They just don’t know it yet.

For investors, the message is clear. Stop looking at treasury size and start looking at operational revenue. The age of paying premiums for Bitcoin hoarders is over. The age of digital asset operating companies has begun.

Christopher Miglino

Christopher Miglino is a visionary leader and serial entrepreneur, recognized for his expertise in guiding companies from inception to IPO. As President and Co-founder of DNA and founder of SEQUIRE, he has launched three successful ventures, demonstrating a powerful blend of strategic acumen and capital markets expertise. Christopher is at the forefront of a new era in finance, merging traditional finance with blockchain technology and capital to drive innovation that reshapes industries. His commitment to technological progress and transformative growth makes him a trusted partner for companies aiming to make a lasting impact.

Source: https://crypto.news/dats-cant-survive-as-a-treasury-only-play-opinion/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

OFAC Designates Two Iranian Finance Facilitators For Crypto Shadow Banking

OFAC Designates Two Iranian Finance Facilitators For Crypto Shadow Banking

The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned two Iranian financial facilitators for coordinating over $100 million worth of cryptocurrency in oil sales for the Iranian government, a September 16 press release shows. OFAC Sanctions Iranian Nationals According to the Tuesday press release, Iranian nationals Alireza Derakhshan and Arash Estaki Alivand “used a network of front companies in multiple foreign jurisdictions” to transfer the digital assets. OFAC alleges that Alivand and Derakhshan’s transfers also involved the sale of Iranian oil that benefited Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF) and the Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL). IRGC-QF and MODAFL then used the proceeds to support regional proxy terrorist organizations and strengthen their advanced weapons systems, including ballistic missiles. U.S. officials say the move targets shadow banking in the region, where illicit financial actors use overseas money laundering and digital assets to evade sanctions. “Iranian entities rely on shadow banking networks to evade sanctions and move millions through the international financial system,” said Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence John K. Hurley. “Under President Trump’s leadership, we will continue to disrupt these key financial streams that fund Iran’s weapons programs and malign activities in the Middle East and beyond,” he continued. Dozens Designated In Shadow Banking Scandal Both Alivand and Derakhshan have been designated “for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of the IRGC-QF.” In addition to Alivand and Derakhshan, OFAC has sanctioned more than a dozen Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates-based entities and individuals tied to the network. According to the press release, the sanctioned entities may face civil or criminal penalties imposed as a result
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 11:18