PANews reported on December 13th that, according to Cointelegraph, in response to Citadel's letter to the SEC earlier this month urging the SEC not to grant broadPANews reported on December 13th that, according to Cointelegraph, in response to Citadel's letter to the SEC earlier this month urging the SEC not to grant broad

Citadel urged the SEC to tighten regulations on tokenized stocks on DeFi platforms, drawing criticism from crypto lobbying groups.

2025/12/13 14:35

PANews reported on December 13th that, according to Cointelegraph, in response to Citadel's letter to the SEC earlier this month urging the SEC not to grant broad exemptions to DeFi platforms that would prohibit them from trading tokenized U.S. stocks, arguing that these platforms would likely be defined as "exchanges" or "brokerage firms" regulated under securities laws, Andreessen Horowitz, the Uniswap Foundation, and cryptocurrency lobbying groups such as the DeFi Education Foundation and the Digital Chamber of Commerce have sent a letter to the SEC opposing Citadel Securities' request for the SEC to tighten regulations on tokenized stocks in the DeFi sector.

“Citadel’s letter is based on a flawed analysis of securities law and attempts to extend SEC registration requirements to any entity with even the most indirect connection to DeFi transactions.” Furthermore, while acknowledging Citadel’s goals of protecting investors and maintaining market integrity, they disagree that “achieving these goals always requires registration as a traditional U.S. SEC intermediary, and in some cases, a well-designed on-chain market cannot fulfill these goals.” The letter also criticizes Citadel’s definition of autonomous software as an intermediary, arguing that autonomous software cannot be a “middleman” in financial transactions because it “is not a person capable of independently exercising discretion or judgment.”

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.