TLDR Hyper Foundation proposed burning all 37 million HYPE tokens in the Assistance Fund, representing 13% of circulating supply Validators must vote by DecemberTLDR Hyper Foundation proposed burning all 37 million HYPE tokens in the Assistance Fund, representing 13% of circulating supply Validators must vote by December

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price: Can 37 Million Token Burn Reverse Recent Decline?

TLDR

  • Hyper Foundation proposed burning all 37 million HYPE tokens in the Assistance Fund, representing 13% of circulating supply
  • Validators must vote by December 21, with final stake-weighted results announced December 24
  • The Assistance Fund address has no private key and tokens are permanently inaccessible without a hard fork
  • HYPE price increased 2% to $26.66 following the announcement, with futures open interest jumping 3% to $1.52 billion
  • Bitwise recently filed for the first spot Hyperliquid ETF in the United States with a 0.67% management fee

The Hyper Foundation announced a proposal on December 17 to burn all HYPE tokens held in the Assistance Fund address. The proposal requires approval through validator voting.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) PriceHyperliquid (HYPE) Price

The Assistance Fund currently holds 37 million HYPE tokens. These tokens represent about 13% of the circulating supply and 3.71% of the total supply.

The fund operates by automatically converting trading fees collected by the exchange into HYPE tokens. These tokens are stored at a system address that has never had a private key or any form of control.

The tokens in this address cannot be accessed or moved without executing a hard fork of the network. The burn proposal would permanently remove these tokens from the total supply count.

Validators are scheduled to submit their votes in the governance forum by December 21 at 04:00 UTC. Users can stake their tokens with validators who share their view on the proposal until December 24 at 04:00 UTC.

Voting Process and Timeline

The final decision will be determined through stake-weighted consensus. The results will be measured and announced at the close of voting on December 24 at 04:00 UTC.

A “Yes” vote means validators agree to treat the tokens as permanently removed from circulation. The proposal also includes a commitment that no future protocol upgrade would ever attempt to access the locked tokens.

Some validators have already publicly expressed support for the burn. Kinetiq x Hyperion announced they voted in favor of removing all tokens in the Assistance Fund address.

Market Response to Burn Proposal

HYPE price rose 2% following the announcement. The token traded at $26.66 with a 24-hour range between $26.21 and $26.66. Trading volume decreased 5% over the same period.

Data from CoinGlass showed increased activity in the derivatives market. Total HYPE futures open interest climbed 3% to $1.52 billion in 24 hours. The 4-hour futures open interest increased almost 4%.

Both CME and Binance recorded open interest increases exceeding 5%. The funding rate rose to 0.0839%, indicating higher buying pressure in the derivatives market.

Technical indicators on the daily chart show the token holding above the $26 support level. The Relative Strength Index sits at 33, below the midpoint since early November. The token has declined for three consecutive days before stabilizing.

If HYPE maintains support above $26, potential resistance levels include $30 and the 50-day exponential moving average at $34. A break below $26 could push the price toward the October 10 low near $20.

Bitwise recently amended its S-1 filing for a spot Hyperliquid ETF. The filing revealed a management fee of 0.67% and ticker symbol BHYP for the proposed fund.

The post Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price: Can 37 Million Token Burn Reverse Recent Decline? appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Hyperliquid Logo
Hyperliquid Price(HYPE)
$27.35
$27.35$27.35
+0.18%
USD
Hyperliquid (HYPE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What We Know (and Don’t) About Modern Code Reviews

What We Know (and Don’t) About Modern Code Reviews

This article traces the evolution of modern code review from formal inspections to tool-driven workflows, maps key research themes, and highlights a critical gap
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/17 17:00
X claims the right to share your private AI chats with everyone under new rules – no opt out

X claims the right to share your private AI chats with everyone under new rules – no opt out

X says its Terms of Service will change Jan. 15, 2026, expanding how the platform defines user “Content” and adding contract language tied to the operation and
Share
CryptoSlate2025/12/17 19:24
Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference

Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference

The post Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The suitcoiners are in town.  From a low-key, circular podium in the middle of a lavish New York City event hall, Strategy executive chairman Michael Saylor took the mic and opened the Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference event. He joked awkwardly about the orange ties, dresses, caps and other merch to the (mostly male) audience of who’s-who in the bitcoin treasury company world.  Once he got onto the regular beat, it was much of the same: calm and relaxed, speaking freely and with confidence, his keynote was heavy on the metaphors and larger historical stories. Treasury companies are like Rockefeller’s Standard Oil in its early years, Michael Saylor said: We’ve just discovered crude oil and now we’re making sense of the myriad ways in which we can use it — the automobile revolution and jet fuel is still well ahead of us.  Established, trillion-dollar companies not using AI because of “security concerns” make them slow and stupid — just like companies and individuals rejecting digital assets now make them poor and weak.  “I’d like to think that we understood our business five years ago; we didn’t.”  We went from a defensive investment into bitcoin, Saylor said, to opportunistic, to strategic, and finally transformational; “only then did we realize that we were different.” Michael Saylor: You Come Into My Financial History House?! Jokes aside, Michael Saylor is very welcome to the warm waters of our financial past. He acquitted himself honorably by invoking the British Consol — though mispronouncing it, and misdating it to the 1780s; Pelham’s consolidation of debts happened in the 1750s and perpetual government debt existed well before then — and comparing it to the gold standard and the future of bitcoin. He’s right that Strategy’s STRC product in many ways imitates the consols; irredeemable, perpetual debt, issued at par, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:12