'But one thing is sure: they did not undergo any training here,' says National Security Adviser Eduardo Año'But one thing is sure: they did not undergo any training here,' says National Security Adviser Eduardo Año

‘Bonding’ in Davao? Philippines probes Bondi shooters’ monthlong stay

2025/12/19 20:41

MANILA, Philippines – Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., speaking before a hall full of top military generals, said claims that the country was a “training hotspot for terrorism” were unacceptable, even as investigators piece together what the Bondi Beach shooters did during their monthlong stay in Davao City. 

“We also reject in the strongest terms the recent misleading claims that portray our country as a training hotspot for terrorism,” Marcos said at the 90th anniversary celebration of the Philippine military on Friday, December 19. 

For decades, the Philippine military’s focus had been turned toward internal security, serving as frontliners against everything from insurgencies to terror threats. 

It’s only been in the past three years, under Marcos, that the military has made a more explicit shift to focus on external defense. 

“For years, we have acted decisively to dismantle terrorist networks, to secure communities, and to sustain our hard-earned peace. To dismiss these gains with unfounded speculation is not acceptable,” the President added. 

Investigators and security officials in the Philippines continue to figure out the exact activities of 50-year-old Sajid Akram and his son, 24-year-old Naveed, who attacked a Hanukkah event at Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia, on December 14. Weeks before the shooting, the two were in the Philippines for a month in Davao City, a major hub in the island of Mindanao. 

Why Davao? 

MindaNews, a Mindanao-based news site, earlier reported that the two were billeted in a cheap hotel in the city and mostly kept to themselves. 

Philippine National Security Adviser Eduardo Año, speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the military’s anniversary, said they had validated the claims of the hotel staff. 

“All the 28 days that they stayed in Davao, every night they slept in the same hotel,” Año told reporters. 

While the father and son did leave their hotel rooms, it was never for that long, Año noted. They would jog in the morning and return after two or three hours. The longest they stayed out was eight hours, according to the Philippines’ top security official. 

“But still, that time window will not suffice for them to get out of Davao. So, that’s where they really stayed. Maybe they’re using the internet heavily, maybe they’re talking to somebody else. But [in terms] of physical activities, there are none,” Año said in a mix of English and Filipino.

Año said they were still in the process of acquiring CCTV camera footage from different parts of Davao City.

“Probably, the father and son pair were bonding. Probably, the son was recruiting the father. Naveed was recruited first,” Año said.   

Año, himself a former chief of the military, said they’ve yet to determine why the pair decided to stay in Davao in the first place. 

“Perhaps they know that Davao is a very progressive and safe city. We can just speculate on why they chose Davao. There are possibilities,” Año said. 

What kind? The retired general said the two could have wanted to “meet someone who did not come” or maybe meet a prospective contact. 

“We can just speculate based on what happened. But one thing is sure: they did not undergo any training here. They did not meet any local terrorist group member based [in Mindanao],” he said. 

Coordination with Canberra 

The younger Akram, an Australian-born citizen, had been flagged in 2019 by Australian intelligence over suspected ties to a Sydney-based Islamic State cell. But the assessment then, said Australia Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, was that “there was no indication of any ongoing threat or threat of him engaging in violence.”

“These kind of people should be on watch lists and their movements monitored. But, you know, these persons traveling — one person with an Indian passport, and the other with an Austalian passport — that’s [not usually] a red flag for us,” Año said. 

The Philippine security adviser said the two countries are expected to discuss the monitoring of persons who had been flagged but later cleared during regular bilteral consulations with their Australian counterparts on counterterrorism. 

Manila and Canberra enjoy close defense and security ties, including cooperation on counterterrorism efforts in southern Philippines. In recent years, the defense relationship has expanded to include maritime cooperation, as well. – Rappler.com 

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0,0005167
$0,0005167$0,0005167
-1,28%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

DEX Screener is used by crypto traders who need access to on-chain data like trading volumes, liquidity, and token prices. This information allows them to analyze trends, monitor new listings, and make informed investment decisions. In this tutorial, I will build a DEXScreener clone from scratch, covering everything from the initial design to a functional app. We will use Streamlit, a Python framework for building full-stack apps.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 15:05
Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

A viral chart documenting a sharp decline in U.S. federal employment during President Trump's second term has sparked unexpected confusion in cryptocurrency markets
Share
Coinstats2025/12/20 01:13
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00