Major On-Chain Losses Due to Address Poisoning Attack A significant onchain fraud incident has highlighted the ongoing risks associated with address poisoning scamsMajor On-Chain Losses Due to Address Poisoning Attack A significant onchain fraud incident has highlighted the ongoing risks associated with address poisoning scams

Copy-Paste Error Causes $50M USDt Loss in Address Poisoning Scam

Copy-Paste Error Causes $50m Usdt Loss In Address Poisoning Scam

Major On-Chain Losses Due to Address Poisoning Attack

A significant onchain fraud incident has highlighted the ongoing risks associated with address poisoning scams in the cryptocurrency space. An individual mistakenly transferred nearly USD 50 million in USDt (Tether) to a scammer’s wallet, resulting in one of the largest losses seen this year. The mistake occurred after the victim copied a malicious address from their transaction history, falling victim to a sophisticated address poisoning scheme that relies on subtle address similarities to deceive even seasoned users.

Key Takeaways

  • An individual lost almost USD 50 million USDt due to a classic address poisoning scam.
  • The attack exploited the victim’s reliance on copying addresses from transaction history, which contained lookalike scam addresses.
  • Onchain analysis shows the initial small transfer was legitimate, but the subsequent full amount was sent to the poisoned address.
  • The attacker has moved the stolen funds into Ether and partially laundered through Tornado Cash.

Tickers mentioned: USDt, ETH

Sentiment: Cautiously Bearish

Price impact: Negative, as scams undermine trust and highlight ongoing security challenges in the crypto ecosystem.

Market context: This incident underscores the persistent security threats within the cryptocurrency sector amid rising onchain losses and high-profile breaches.

Details of the Scam and Its Implications

The incident was uncovered through onchain investigations, which revealed that the victim’s wallet had been active for approximately two years and primarily used for USDt transactions. Notably, the funds were withdrawn from Binance shortly before the loss, indicating active management of the wallet prior to the theft.

According to security researcher Cos, founder of SlowMist, the scam’s success rested on the subtle similarities between the malicious address and the legitimate one. “You can see the first three characters and last four characters are the same,” he explained, emphasizing how such minor overlaps can deceive even experienced users. The attacker’s strategy involved small transfers that layered lookalike addresses into transaction histories, making future copying attempts risky.

Following the theft, the attacker swiftly swapped the USDt for Ether and divided the proceeds into multiple wallets. Part of the stolen funds has been moved into Tornado Cash, a privacy-focused mixing service, complicating efforts to trace the assets. The incident serves as a stark reminder of how human habits can be exploited in security breaches, relying less on exploiting system vulnerabilities and more on behavioral deception.

The rising prevalence of address poisoning scams coincides with a surge in crypto-related hacks, which resulted in approximately $3.4 billion in losses in 2025. Notably, three major breaches, including a nearly $1.4 billion hack of the derivatives platform Bybit, contributed to over two-thirds of total losses this year, illustrating the still-prevalent risks facing the industry.

This article was originally published as Copy-Paste Error Causes $50M USDt Loss in Address Poisoning Scam on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Market Opportunity
Scamcoin Logo
Scamcoin Price(SCAM)
$0.000831
$0.000831$0.000831
-1.18%
USD
Scamcoin (SCAM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

The post U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The United States is contending with the intricacies of cryptocurrency regulation as newly enacted legislation stirs debate over centralized versus decentralized finance. The recent passage of the GENIUS Act under Bo Hines’ leadership is perceived to skew favor towards centralized entities, potentially disadvantaging decentralized innovations. Continue Reading:U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/u-s-moves-grip-on-crypto-regulation-intensifies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:09
Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58