TLDR BlackRock’s IBIT pulled in about $25B in 2025 inflows, ranking sixth among U.S. ETFs. IBIT is the only top-ranked ETF in 2025 with a negative year-to-date TLDR BlackRock’s IBIT pulled in about $25B in 2025 inflows, ranking sixth among U.S. ETFs. IBIT is the only top-ranked ETF in 2025 with a negative year-to-date

BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Draws Strong Inflows In 2025 Amid Weak Performance

TLDR

  • BlackRock’s IBIT pulled in about $25B in 2025 inflows, ranking sixth among U.S. ETFs.
  • IBIT is the only top-ranked ETF in 2025 with a negative year-to-date return.
  • Gold ETF GLD gained over 60% in 2025 but attracted less capital than IBIT.
  • BlackRock reported $2.34B in IBIT outflows during November 2025.

BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF, iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), ranked sixth among all U.S. ETFs for net inflows in 2025. This result comes despite the fund recording a negative annual return. Data from Bloomberg indicates that IBIT attracted approximately $25 billion in inflows year-to-date. The ranking places IBIT ahead of several top-performing funds, indicating strong investor interest in Bitcoin exposure, regardless of short-term price fluctuations.

Strong ETF Inflows Signal Institutional Interest in Bitcoin

IBIT’s inflow of $25 billion this year places it among the most successful ETFs in terms of capital attraction. Notably, it ranks above several equity and bond ETFs that posted double-digit gains, as well as the gold-backed GLD ETF, which recorded over 60% gains but drew less investment than IBIT.

Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas highlighted these numbers to illustrate investor behavior. He stated that such inflows, despite negative returns, reflect longer-term confidence in Bitcoin as an asset class. He suggested that many investors are not focused on short-term gains but instead take a long-term strategy, with some applying a “buy and hold” approach. Balchunas described this pattern as consistent with the behavior of seasoned investors who view Bitcoin as a long-term store of value or strategic asset.

Bitcoin Price Movement Lags Behind ETF Demand

Despite continued capital inflow into spot Bitcoin ETFs, Bitcoin’s market performance in 2025 has not kept pace. On a year-to-date basis, Bitcoin has underperformed, with prices declining from prior highs. Some market participants have questioned why rising institutional ETF purchases have not driven stronger price performance.

Balchunas addressed this concern by noting that the Bitcoin market has matured. In this environment, long-term holders often choose to manage risk and take profits rather than chase short-term price movements. Additionally, many are now using options strategies to generate yield, reducing immediate upward pressure on prices.

Data from December 19 showed $158 million in net outflows across all U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs. Fidelity’s FBTC was the only fund to report net inflows that day. Spot Ether ETFs also experienced continued outflows, with $75.9 million withdrawn, extending a seven-day losing streak for Ether-based ETFs.

BlackRock Maintains Confidence Despite Short-Term Outflows

In November 2025, BlackRock’s IBIT faced nearly $2.34 billion in net outflows, including two days of large investor withdrawals. While the short-term trend raised concerns among some observers, BlackRock remained confident in its long-term strategy.

Speaking at Blockchain Conference 2025 in São Paulo, Cristiano Castro, BlackRock’s director of business development, emphasized that the firm’s Bitcoin ETF products have become major contributors to revenue. He noted that ETFs serve multiple roles, including cash-flow management and rebalancing, and that periods of outflows are part of regular capital market cycles.

The post BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Draws Strong Inflows In 2025 Amid Weak Performance appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.003017
$0.003017$0.003017
-2.14%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan

Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan

The firm has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to launch a $4 billion at-the-market (ATM) equity program, […] The post Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 04:15
Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Payments has joined the Open Intents Framework as a core contributor, working alongside Ethereum Foundation and other major players. The initiative aims to simplify complex multi-chain interactions through automated solver technology. The post Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework appeared first on Coinspeaker.
Share
Coinspeaker2025/09/18 02:43