The DEX said all user funds are fully solvent and verifiable, urging critics to run a node and check balances directly on the blockchain.The DEX said all user funds are fully solvent and verifiable, urging critics to run a node and check balances directly on the blockchain.

Hyperliquid Denies $362M Risk Claims, Says Platform Is Fully Solvent

2025/12/23 00:52
3 min read

Hyperliquid has strongly denied claims that its protocol lacks enough collateral, stating that its on-chain assets are over $4.3 billion and that all user funds are properly managed.

The detailed rebuttal comes after a widely shared article questioned the financial integrity and transparency of one of crypto’s largest on-chain derivatives venues, which has more than $4.1 billion in total value locked (TVL) according to DefiLlama.

Point-by-Point Refutation of Allegations

Hyperliquid’s response, posted on X on December 22, pointed out that the insolvency allegation stemmed from an accounting error rather than a real shortfall. The protocol explained that the author of the article in question failed to include native HyperEVM USDC balances, which run alongside the Arbitrum bridge. When both are counted, Hyperliquid said total USDC on HyperCore stands at $4.351 billion.

“The Hyperliquid blockchain state is fully and verifiably solvent,” the team wrote, adding that “every dollar is accounted for” and that anyone can independently confirm balances by running a node and checking on-chain data. The protocol also rejected claims of retroactive volume manipulation, saying the cited functions exist only on testnet and are used for stress-testing fee logic.

It also noted that those code paths are unreachable on mainnet and will be removed entirely to avoid confusion. Other allegations touched on supposed “god mode” privileges, oracle control risks, liquidation cartels, hidden lending activity, and the ability to freeze the chain through governance.

However, Hyperliquid said these points reflected misunderstandings of its architecture. For example, it explained that CoreWriter can’t create tokens or transfer user money without approval, the prices for validator-run perps come from an average of major exchanges, and liquidation support is managed by a community-owned liquidity pool that anyone can access.

They also argued that the decentralized exchange’s fully on-chain design offers stronger guarantees than competing perps venues with centralized sequencers.

Price Pressure Amidst Major Supply Proposals

Hyperliquid’s defense of its fundamentals comes at a volatile period for its native HYPE token. After reaching an all-time high near $59 in mid-September, the asset fell dramatically, and at the time of writing, it was trading around $25, representing a decline of approximately 24% over the past month and about 60% from its peak.

Meanwhile, there have been significant supply-side developments, with the Hyper Foundation proposing a validator vote to permanently burn about 37 million HYPE tokens, which is roughly 10% of the circulating supply and is currently held in its Assistance Fund.

If approved, nearly $1 billion worth of tokens would be removed from supply. Validators are set to decide on the proposal by December 24. However, this deflationary move is set against an upcoming token unlock of 9.92 million HYPE scheduled for December 29, which could introduce further selling pressure.

The post Hyperliquid Denies $362M Risk Claims, Says Platform Is Fully Solvent appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Market Opportunity
NODE Logo
NODE Price(NODE)
$0.01598
$0.01598$0.01598
+0.88%
USD
NODE (NODE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16