A Saga is a sequence of local transactions.A Saga is a sequence of local transactions.

A Practical Guide to the Saga Pattern in Spring Boot Microservices

Modern microservices are small, autonomous, and independently deployable — but this also creates a huge problem.

Typical pharmacy prescription management - payments, banking, logistics, supply-chain, or booking systems perform operations across multiple microservices

  • Create Order
  • Reserve Inventory
  • Process Payment
  • Create Shipment
  • Update Loyalty Points

Each runs in its own database, service, and network boundary.

If one operation fails halfway, the entire business flow should not leave the system in an inconsistent state.

This is where the Saga Pattern becomes essential.

What is a Saga? Why Not Use ACID?

A Saga is a sequence of local transactions. \n Each local transaction updates data within one service and publishes an event to trigger the next step.

If a failure occurs:

  • The Saga triggers compensation actions to undo previously completed steps.

Why does ACID (2PC) not work in microservices?

| Problem | Explanation | |:---:|:---:| | 2PC is blocking | If the coordinator crashes, everything hangs. | | Microservices have independent DBs | No shared commit log across distributed DBs. | | Scales poorly | Locks span distributed systems. | | Cloud services do not support XA transactions | DynamoDB, S3, Mongo, Kafka, RDS, etc. |

A Saga avoids these issues with event-driven or orchestrated compensation logic.

Saga Architecture Diagram:

\ Architecture

1. Use Case: Pharmacy Prescription Order Processing

Scenario

Imagine a Pharmacy Prescription Online platform where a customer places an order for a product.

The system involves three independent services:

  1. Order Service – Creates the order record.
  2. Inventory Service – Reserves the product in stock.
  3. Payment Service – Charges the customer.

Problem Without Saga

If one of these steps fails (e.g., payment fails), the previous steps might leave the system in an inconsistent state:

  • Order created
  • Inventory reserved
  • Payment failed
  • Result: Inventory stuck, order incomplete, manual intervention required.

This is unacceptable in enterprise systems, especially when multiple microservices interact.

Solution With Saga

Using a Saga Orchestration Pattern, each service executes its local transaction, and in case of failure, compensation actions roll back previous steps

  • Step 1: Order Service creates an order.
  • Step 2: Inventory Service reserves stock.
  • Step 3: The payment service charges the customer.
  • Failure Handling: If payment fails, the orchestrator calls the Inventory Service to release stock.

This ensures business-level consistency across services.

2. Why We Need the Saga Pattern

  1. Distributed Microservices: Traditional ACID transactions cannot span multiple microservices.
  2. Eventual Consistency: Ensures consistent outcomes without requiring global resource locking.
  3. Fault Tolerance: Automatically rolls back previous steps if a later step fails.
  4. Cloud-Native: Works seamlessly with scalable services in cloud environments.

Loose Coupling: Each service remains independent, communicating only through APIs.

3. Advantages of Using Saga

  • Reliability: Compensating transactions prevent data inconsistencies.
  • Scalability: Each service can scale independently; orchestration is centralized.
  • Resilience: Handles partial failures gracefully.
  • Business-Level Consistency: Focuses on correct business outcomes, not strict database consistency.
  • Monitoring and Debugging: The central orchestrator provides clear logs of each transaction step.

4. Step-by-Step Explanation of the Script

Below is a detailed walkthrough of the key script components from your Spring Boot Saga project.

4.1 Order Model (Order.java)

\

package com.example.orderservice; public class Order {     private Long id;     private String product;     private String status;     public Order() {         // default constructor (required for Jackson)     }     public Order(Long id, String product, String status) {         this.id = id;         this.product = product;         this.status = status;     }     public Long getId() {         return id;     }     public void setId(Long id) {         this.id = id;     }     public String getProduct() {         return product;     }     public void setProduct(String product) {         this.product = product;     }     public String getStatus() {         return status;     }     public void setStatus(String status) {         this.status = status;     } }

  • Purpose: Represents an order.

  • Business Logic: Stores the product name, order ID, and status (CREATED, CANCELLED, COMPLETED).

    4.2 Order Controller (OrderController.java)

    \

package com.example.orderservice; import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.*; @RestController @RequestMapping("/orders") public class OrderController {     @PostMapping     public Order create(@RequestParam("product") String product) {         return new Order(1L, product, "CREATED");     }     @PostMapping("/cancel")     public String cancel() {         return "ORDER_CANCELLED";     }     @PostMapping("/complete")     public String complete() {         return "ORDER_COMPLETED";     } }

\

  • Endpoints

  • POST /orders → Creates an order.

  • POST /orders/cancel → Cancels an order (used for compensation).

  • POST /orders/complete → Marks order completed.

  • Why it works with Saga: Endpoints are simple, predictable, and return either the object or a status string for orchestration.

    4.3 Inventory Controller (InventoryController.java)

    \

package com.example.inventoryservice; import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.*; @RestController @RequestMapping("/inventory") public class InventoryController {     @PostMapping("/reserve")     public boolean reserve(@RequestParam("product") String product) {         return !"FAIL".equals(product);     }     @PostMapping("/release")     public void release(@RequestParam("product") String product) {} }

\

  • Purpose: Reserves product in stock, releases it if payment fails.

  • Logic: Simulates success/failure. In enterprise systems, this would check actual stock in a database.

    \ 4.4. Payment Controller (PaymentController.java)

    \

package com.example.paymentservice; import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.*; @RestController @RequestMapping("/payments") public class PaymentController {     @PostMapping("/pay")     public boolean pay(@RequestParam("amount") double amount) {         return amount <= 5000;     }     @PostMapping("/refund")     public void refund(@RequestParam double amount) {} }

\

  • Purpose: Processes payment and simulates failure for testing.

  • Why it works in Saga: Returns a Boolean indicating success/failure, allowing the orchestrator to trigger compensations.

    4.5. Saga Orchestrator (SagaController.java)

    \

package com.example.sagaorchestrator; import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.*; import org.springframework.web.client.RestTemplate; @RestController @RequestMapping("/saga") public class SagaController {     private final RestTemplate rest = new RestTemplate();     @PostMapping("/order")     public String place(@RequestParam("product") String product, @RequestParam("amount") double amount) {         Object order = rest.postForObject(                 "http://localhost:8081/orders?product=" + product,                 null,                 Object.class         );                  if (order == null) {             return "Order creation failed";         }         Boolean inventory = rest.postForObject(             "http://localhost:8082/inventory/reserve?product=" + product,             null,             Boolean.class         );         if (inventory == null || !inventory) {             return "Inventory failed";         }         Boolean payment = rest.postForObject(             "http://localhost:8083/payments/pay?amount=" + amount,             null,             Boolean.class         );         if (payment == null || !payment) {             rest.postForObject(                     "http://localhost:8082/inventory/release?product=" + product,                     null,                     Void.class             );             return "Payment failed, compensated";         }         return "Order completed successfully";     } }

\

  • Flow Explained
  1. Order creation → First step, must succeed to proceed.
  2. Inventory reservation → If it fails, the saga stops.
  3. Payment processing → If it fails, the orchestrator triggers inventory release (compensation).
  4. Success → Returns a success message.

Enterprise Ready: Demonstrates clear orchestration, compensation, and business-level consistency.

\ 4.6 Verification of Outputs

\

  1. Success Case

\

  1. Payment Failure Case

\ Postman

\

  1. Inventory Failure Case:

\ ** Postman

5. Advantages Highlighted

  • Fault-Tolerant: Automatically compensates failed transactions.
  • Business Consistency: Ensures the order state and inventory are always consistent.
  • Scalable: Each service runs independently.
  • Cloud-Native Ready: Can run on Kubernetes or any cloud environment.
  • Enterprise Applicable: Matches real-world systems in healthcare, banking, and data platforms.

6. Why Enterprises Need This Pattern

  • In distributed systems, manual rollback is error-prone.
  • Saga ensures automatic recovery, reducing downtime.
  • Prevents inconsistent data in multi-service workflows.
  • Supports asynchronous processing, improving performance and scalability.

\

Market Opportunity
SAGA Logo
SAGA Price(SAGA)
$0.05909
$0.05909$0.05909
+1.04%
USD
SAGA (SAGA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
WazirX founder confirms that the Indian crypto exchange’s dispute with Binance has escalated to formal litigation

WazirX founder confirms that the Indian crypto exchange’s dispute with Binance has escalated to formal litigation

WazirX founder and CEO Nischal Shetty has confirmed that the Indian crypto exchange’s dispute with Binance has escalated to formal litigation. This has raised concerns
Share
Coinstats2025/12/27 05:45
WazirX founder Nischal Shetty says Binance ownership dispute now in litigation

WazirX founder Nischal Shetty says Binance ownership dispute now in litigation

The post WazirX founder Nischal Shetty says Binance ownership dispute now in litigation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WazirX founder and CEO Nischal Shetty
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/27 05:53