The post 10‑year Treasury trades see $30.5 billion in delivery fails, Fed says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. $30.5 billion worth of 10-year Treasury tradesThe post 10‑year Treasury trades see $30.5 billion in delivery fails, Fed says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. $30.5 billion worth of 10-year Treasury trades

10‑year Treasury trades see $30.5 billion in delivery fails, Fed says

$30.5 billion worth of 10-year Treasury trades failed to settle during the week ending December 10, the highest volume of delivery fails since December 2017, according to data from the New York Fed on Friday.

The mess is tied to the Federal Reserve’s shrinking bond portfolio, a tightening plan that’s been in play since mid‑2022. And yes, it’s breaking things.

The failed trades involved the most recently issued 10-year Treasury note. That specific batch came from a $42 billion auction held on November 12. The interest rates for lending that security collapsed so badly that some holders agreed to lend it at negative rates, meaning they gave it away cheaper than they got it back. In this type of repo transaction, settlement fails are almost guaranteed. That’s exactly what happened.

Fed added less supply to the market in recent auctions

Ahead of a Dec. 15 reopening of that same note, traders expected more supply to ease the pressure. That didn’t happen. Instead of the usual market relief, the reopening saw a sharp shortage. This wasn’t the regular “special” rate situation you sometimes see in repurchase agreements. This time, it was worse. And the blame goes to the Federal Reserve again.

At that November auction, the Fed only took $6.5 billion worth of the notes for its own books. That’s a lot less than usual. In February, the Fed had added $11.5 billion to a similar-sized sale. In May, it took $14.8 billion, and in August, $14.3 billion. So, what changed?

Here’s what changed: the Fed’s maturing Treasury holdings dropped sharply. Their System Open Market Account (SOMA) had just $22 billion maturing on Nov. 15, compared to $45 to $49 billion maturing in previous cycles. And since the Fed only reinvests maturing Treasuries above a certain cap, the amount they rolled over fell too.

That cap has changed over time. Back in June 2022, the monthly cap was $30 billion. By September, it doubled to $60 billion. That tightening move directly impacted how much of each auction the Fed could touch. As a result, they didn’t step in to support the November 10-year note the way they had earlier this year. Same thing happened with three-year notes, by the way — smaller add-ons there too.

This left traders scrambling to borrow a note that wasn’t widely available. Which meant more failed settlements, more headaches, and yeah, $30.5 billion worth of broken trades in just one week.

Yields across Treasury curve change after holiday and strong economic data

Markets came back online after the Christmas holiday, and the 10-year Treasury yield barely moved. It fell by less than one basis point, landing at 4.13%. The 2-year yield dropped over 2 basis points, ending at 3.483%. One basis point equals 0.01%, and in the bond world, yields move opposite to prices.

The Treasury curve saw these changes on Friday:

  • 1-month: 3.619% (+0.006)
  • 3-month: 3.633% (-0.011)
  • 6-month: 3.585% (-0.014)
  • 1-year: 3.49% (-0.016)
  • 2-year: 3.481% (-0.029)
  • 10-year: 4.13% (-0.004)
  • 30-year: 4.816% (+0.021)

The moves came as traders processed fresh economic numbers. The Labor Department said jobless claims fell to 214,000 for the week ending December 20, down 10,000 from the week before. It came in below forecasts.

And on top of that, the Commerce Department reported the U.S. economy grew 4.3% in Q1, marking the fastest pace in two years.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days – normally $100/mo.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/10y-treasury-trades-30-5b-in-delivery-fails/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Secret Service’s ‘odd’ new suit policy raises eyebrows

Secret Service’s ‘odd’ new suit policy raises eyebrows

New Secret Service agents assigned to protective details are set to receive a taxpayer-funded wardrobe upgrade, according to a new CNN exclusive report.The Secret
Share
Rawstory2026/02/21 08:04
The Shift to Fractional Leadership: Agility in the 2026 Executive Suite

The Shift to Fractional Leadership: Agility in the 2026 Executive Suite

The traditional model of a permanent, full-time executive suite is undergoing a radical transformation. As we move through 2026, the concept of “Fractional Leadership
Share
Techbullion2026/02/21 08:20
OFAC Designates Two Iranian Finance Facilitators For Crypto Shadow Banking

OFAC Designates Two Iranian Finance Facilitators For Crypto Shadow Banking

The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned two Iranian financial facilitators for coordinating over $100 million worth of cryptocurrency in oil sales for the Iranian government, a September 16 press release shows. OFAC Sanctions Iranian Nationals According to the Tuesday press release, Iranian nationals Alireza Derakhshan and Arash Estaki Alivand “used a network of front companies in multiple foreign jurisdictions” to transfer the digital assets. OFAC alleges that Alivand and Derakhshan’s transfers also involved the sale of Iranian oil that benefited Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF) and the Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL). IRGC-QF and MODAFL then used the proceeds to support regional proxy terrorist organizations and strengthen their advanced weapons systems, including ballistic missiles. U.S. officials say the move targets shadow banking in the region, where illicit financial actors use overseas money laundering and digital assets to evade sanctions. “Iranian entities rely on shadow banking networks to evade sanctions and move millions through the international financial system,” said Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence John K. Hurley. “Under President Trump’s leadership, we will continue to disrupt these key financial streams that fund Iran’s weapons programs and malign activities in the Middle East and beyond,” he continued. Dozens Designated In Shadow Banking Scandal Both Alivand and Derakhshan have been designated “for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of the IRGC-QF.” In addition to Alivand and Derakhshan, OFAC has sanctioned more than a dozen Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates-based entities and individuals tied to the network. According to the press release, the sanctioned entities may face civil or criminal penalties imposed as a result
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 11:18