Holiday trading drained $782M from Bitcoin ETFs as institutions stepped back Bitcoin ETFs faced six straight outflow days amid thin Christmas liquidity InstitutionalHoliday trading drained $782M from Bitcoin ETFs as institutions stepped back Bitcoin ETFs faced six straight outflow days amid thin Christmas liquidity Institutional

Bitcoin ETFs See $782M Drain as Holiday Trading Triggers Investor Retreat

  • Holiday trading drained $782M from Bitcoin ETFs as institutions stepped back
  • Bitcoin ETFs faced six straight outflow days amid thin Christmas liquidity
  • Institutional retreat hit Bitcoin ETFs despite stable prices near $87,000

Spot Bitcoin exchange traded funds recorded heavy selling pressure during the Christmas period, according to SoSoValue. Investors withdrew a combined $782 million, signaling a clear retreat as holiday trading reduced market participation. During the week, outflows accelerated as liquidity thinned across US markets. The largest single day of selling occurred on Friday, when spot Bitcoin ETFs posted $276 million in net withdrawals.


BlackRock’s IBIT absorbed the biggest hit, with nearly $193 million exiting the fund. Fidelity’s FBTC followed with about $74 million in redemptions, reflecting broad based selling across major issuers. Meanwhile, Grayscale’s GBTC continued to record modest but persistent outflows. As a result, total net assets across US listed spot Bitcoin ETFs fell to around $113.5 billion by Friday.


Earlier in December, ETF assets had climbed above $120 billion, underscoring the scale of the pullback. However, Bitcoin prices remained relatively steady near $87,000, suggesting price resilience despite fund withdrawals.


Importantly, Friday marked the sixth consecutive session of net outflows for spot Bitcoin ETFs. Over this six day stretch, cumulative withdrawals exceeded $1.1 billion, marking the longest outflow streak since early autumn.


Also Read: Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) Price Prediction 2025–2029: Can PENGU Reclaim $0.02 Soon?


Holiday trading pressures weigh on institutional positioning

According to Vincent Liu, chief investment officer at Kronos Research, holiday driven positioning often distorts ETF flows. He said reduced staffing and thinner liquidity typically lead institutions to trim exposure temporarily.


Moreover, Liu explained that many desks rebalance portfolios ahead of year end, which can pressure ETF flows. Consequently, these outflows may not reflect a fundamental shift in long term demand. He added that institutional activity usually resumes once normal trading conditions return in early January. Besides that, expectations around future monetary policy could help stabilize sentiment.


Rate markets currently price in roughly 75 to 100 basis points of potential cuts, pointing to easing momentum. Additionally, expanding bank led crypto infrastructure continues to reduce friction for large capital allocators.


Sustained ETF outflows raise caution signals

However, broader data suggests caution remains across the ETF landscape. According to Glassnode, Bitcoin and Ether ETFs have entered a sustained outflow phase since early November.


The firm reported that the 30 day moving average of net ETF flows has stayed negative. Consequently, this trend points to cooling institutional participation as global liquidity conditions tighten. As ETFs are widely viewed as a gauge of institutional sentiment, prolonged withdrawals indicate reduced risk appetite. Significantly, institutions had been a major driver of crypto market strength earlier in the year.


Overall, the $782 million ETF drain highlights how holiday trading can trigger short term investor retreats.


Also Read: Peter Schiff Warns Bitcoin HODLers as $28B Options Expiry Looms



The post Bitcoin ETFs See $782M Drain as Holiday Trading Triggers Investor Retreat appeared first on 36Crypto.

Market Opportunity
SIX Logo
SIX Price(SIX)
$0.01134
$0.01134$0.01134
0.00%
USD
SIX (SIX) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
XRP Price Prediction: XRP to Soar as This Top Crypto Under $0.05 Eyes 5000% Rally

XRP Price Prediction: XRP to Soar as This Top Crypto Under $0.05 Eyes 5000% Rally

While the sentiment grows with regard to a possible positive breakout in the XRP pricing, expert investors continue to turn their attention to the best cryptocurrency
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/12/29 01:30