TLDR $94M USDC withdrawn from TRUMP liquidity pools in December. $33M moved on Dec. 30 via Fireblocks to Coinbase wallets. TRUMP token plunged 90% from $75 highTLDR $94M USDC withdrawn from TRUMP liquidity pools in December. $33M moved on Dec. 30 via Fireblocks to Coinbase wallets. TRUMP token plunged 90% from $75 high

Trump Memecoin Wallets Withdraw $94M USDC to Coinbase Wallets

2025/12/31 22:20
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

TLDR

  • $94M USDC withdrawn from TRUMP liquidity pools in December.
  • $33M moved on Dec. 30 via Fireblocks to Coinbase wallets.
  • TRUMP token plunged 90% from $75 high to under $5.
  • Insiders gained over $320M in trading and liquidity fees.

Wallets associated with the Official Trump (TRUMP) memecoin project on Solana transferred approximately $94 million in USD Coin (USDC) to Coinbase in December. The transactions, identified by on-chain analytics firm Arkham, involved multiple wallets labeled under the “Official Trump Meme” cluster.

The most recent transfer occurred on December 30, when $33 million USDC was withdrawn from TRUMP liquidity pools and routed through Fireblocks to Coinbase-linked wallets. Blockchain data from Solscan confirmed the large outflows, showing consistent withdrawals across several days.

TRUMP’s Decline from Peak Performance

The transfers conclude a volatile year for the TRUMP token, which launched on January 18, 2025, just before the U.S. presidential inauguration. The token reached an all-time high of $75.35 on January 19 but has since dropped to below $5, reflecting a decline of nearly 90%.

Despite the sharp price drop, insiders reportedly earned over $320 million in fees tied to liquidity and transaction structures. According to CoinMarketCap data, trading volume fell sharply after the token’s midyear peak, leaving many late entrants with losses while a handful of wallets accumulated large stablecoin reserves.

Movement Raises Transparency Questions

The purpose of the $94 million USDC movement remains uncertain. Analysts suggest that such transfers could relate to treasury management, tax planning, or off-chain settlement obligations. Fireblocks, a digital asset custody and transfer platform, was used to move funds before their deposit into Coinbase-identified addresses.

Arkham’s labeling does not confirm wallet ownership, but repeated liquidity withdrawals by addresses connected to the Trump memecoin team have drawn public scrutiny. The politically themed branding of the project has made its financial activities a focus of ongoing interest among both traders and lawmakers.

Earlier this year, Democratic lawmakers requested that the U.S. Treasury Department release detailed information about Donald Trump’s crypto holdings and related ventures. The timing of these transfers has therefore attracted additional attention. The TRUMP team did not respond to Cointelegraph’s request for comment.

Memecoin Market Faces Widespread Losses

The TRUMP token’s decline mirrors broader weakness across the memecoin sector in 2025. Leading tokens such as Dogecoin, Shiba Inu, and Pepe retained large market caps but ended the year well below their previous highs.

A long list of Solana- and Ethereum-based memecoins, including those themed around elections and public figures, suffered deep drawdowns of up to 90%. Many of these tokens saw steep post-launch collapses and thin exit liquidity by year-end, reflecting waning speculative demand after an overheated first half of 2025.

The post Trump Memecoin Wallets Withdraw $94M USDC to Coinbase Wallets appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$2.991
$2.991$2.991
-1.35%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Why More Startups Are Automating Their HR Processes in 2025

Why More Startups Are Automating Their HR Processes in 2025

  Startups in 2025 are moving faster than ever. With lean teams, remote workforces, and aggressive growth goals, manual HR management no longer fits the modern
Share
Techbullion2026/03/08 15:29
Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand

Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand

The post Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SHIB exchange flow is hinting
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/08 15:30