Instead of one clear breach, wallets are being drained in small amounts across multiple networks, often without victims realizing what […] The post Hack WarningInstead of one clear breach, wallets are being drained in small amounts across multiple networks, often without victims realizing what […] The post Hack Warning

Hack Warning: Mysterious Wallet-Draining Attack Spreads Across EVM Chains

2026/01/03 00:34

Instead of one clear breach, wallets are being drained in small amounts across multiple networks, often without victims realizing what went wrong until funds are already gone.

Key Takeaways
  • An unusual wallet-draining attack is spreading across multiple EVM chains, with no clear phishing link or smart contract exploit identified so far.
  • Stolen funds are being deliberately scattered across Ethereum, BNB Chain, and several layer-2 networks, complicating tracing efforts.
  • The incident adds to a surge in crypto hacks in December, reinforcing concerns about wallet infrastructure and browser-based security risks.

The activity was first highlighted by on-chain investigator ZachXBT, who identified clusters of unexplained wallet losses. While most individual cases involve relatively small sums, typically under $2,000, the combined losses have already climbed above $107,000 and may grow as more affected wallets are uncovered.

No clear exploit leaves users and analysts guessing

What makes this incident particularly troubling is the absence of a confirmed entry point. Analysts have not linked the drainings to malicious contract approvals, compromised smart contracts, or widespread phishing links. This has shifted suspicion toward deeper infrastructure issues, possibly involving wallet software or browser-based components rather than direct user mistakes.

The lack of clarity has made defensive measures harder, as users do not yet know which specific actions may expose them to risk.

Stolen funds scattered across multiple blockchains

On-chain tracking shows that the attacker is deliberately fragmenting the stolen assets. The largest share remains on Ethereum, with a significant portion bridged to BNB Chain. Smaller balances have appeared across Base, Arbitrum, Polygon, Optimism, as well as Avalanche, Linea, and Zora.

This dispersion suggests an effort to slow down forensic analysis rather than immediately cash out the funds.

READ MORE:

Crypto Enters a New Era of Global Tax Transparency

Possible overlap with earlier Trust Wallet incident

Researchers have also pointed to a potential connection with a previous browser extension issue involving Trust Wallet. During the holiday period, a compromised update briefly exposed users after injected code entered a specific extension version, an incident later linked to losses estimated around $7 million.

Trust Wallet CEO Eowyn Chen confirmed that the affected extension was removed from the Chrome Web Store and replaced with a version offering improved ownership verification and refund tools. While a direct link to the current wallet drainings has not been confirmed, at least one overlapping address has raised fresh questions.

December adds to an already grim security picture

The timing of this incident adds to a bleak month for crypto security. According to PeckShield, December alone saw roughly 26 major exploits, with total losses nearing $76 million.

Beyond this latest case, address poisoning scams drained about $50 million, while a leaked private key tied to a multi-signature wallet resulted in more than $27 million disappearing almost instantly. Over the full year, crypto-related theft is estimated at around $2.7 billion, with the massive Bybit breach standing out as the single largest incident.

A significant portion of these attacks has been linked to state-backed groups, with actors connected to North Korea frequently cited as the most active and damaging.

As investigators continue to piece together the mechanics of this EVM-wide wallet draining, the lack of a confirmed exploit remains the biggest concern. Until more is known, security experts are urging heightened caution, especially around wallet extensions, transaction approvals, and cross-chain interactions.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post Hack Warning: Mysterious Wallet-Draining Attack Spreads Across EVM Chains appeared first on Coindoo.

Market Opportunity
Ambire Wallet Logo
Ambire Wallet Price(WALLET)
$0.01628
$0.01628$0.01628
+1.18%
USD
Ambire Wallet (WALLET) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
PEPE leads memecoin gains amid post-holiday crypto market altcoin rally

PEPE leads memecoin gains amid post-holiday crypto market altcoin rally

Memecoins like FLOKI, Dogwifhat, and fartcoin are up double digits amid an early-year crypto market rally on Friday.
Share
Coinstats2026/01/03 03:19
Vitalik Buterin: Ethereum Progressed in 2025, Must Decentralize in 2026

Vitalik Buterin: Ethereum Progressed in 2025, Must Decentralize in 2026

Vitalik Buterin stressed that Ethereum’s next phase depends as much on decentralization as on technical upgrades.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/01/03 04:04